I’m not suggesting grovelling thanks after every post but something along the lines of thanks for the suggestions chaps, dudes, guys, people, whatever, after a few replies would cost nothing.
If you asked directions to somewhere, would you just drive off without saying thanks?
Well put. Back on topic: did anyone mention the Stirling Project (and if so apologies for poor memory and inability to scroll back while thinking about what I was going to write).
One doesn’t need to travel to do proper research: many repositories offer their resources (be it online or via sales of microfilm, hard copy, CD, microfiche etc), so the ‘excuse’ of cost is no excuse; neither is plagiarism.
$1500 for one article? I need to get back into writing!
Me too: you can see the temptation to do it on the cheap…
I find the prospect of a DH9 mouth watering. There is unlikely to be another.
With you all the way there. I’d like to see an RE.8 in regular use north of the equator and a DH.6 would be something to see if you could get someone brave enough to fly it.
Having set this one running, I wonder if Mr Wilkinson will return to share his thoughts.
I noted another posting on a forum by this serial thread-starter, which was basically a request for information on a subject he was ‘researching’. When I suggested a number of archives for primary source research, he replied that he couldn’t afford to do any of that sort of Research and would instead copy it from extant secondary sources such as published works and the internet. Well that will be an educational read then. It’s been an interesting discussion but don’t expect any response other than those we’ve seen from subsequent posters.
Nice acquisition: I recall seeing this with two others when they were freighted through Lyneham back in the late ’80s/early 90s. I hope the restoration will involve the correct QP colour scheme?
Looks like a crunchy Argosy being toasted: Manston or Catterick?
“Aircraft was J-4101 of the Swiss Air Force.
probably the most iconic civilian operated hunter out there..”
That would be the ‘Papyrus’ Hunter HB-RVS surely? Still safe and sound.
Wow – some effort must have gone into those. Sea Venom-based maybe?
Here we go again. For those not conversant in cryptism, it’s the anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack.
It’s November 2018 and you’re telling us the January 2019 issue is out? Daft.
Not beefy enough! The problem with a lot of the candidates suggested: the photo shows a hefty machine and the Vought is sadly just too weedy.
The dog’s name is only mentioned because it’s a ‘rude word’ and people like to snigger like schoolkids about it or get angry and pretend it’s about supposed Political Correctness without any real reason to get angry. The same sort of people who get annoyed because The Daily Mail tells them to, I’m guessing.
bug**er! He he he. Kind of like that but without the thinly-veiled racism.
It didn’t take long for a supposedly mature conversation about 617 Squadron’s heroic exploits to descend into a tawdry and pointless sniggering about an effing dog. Disappointed.
However, I am wondering whether the ‘perpetrator’ of this model might not also be the source of a clever piece of forgery?
I’m beginning to think the same thing: I’m sure such a beefy, obviously well-engineered type would be well-known among us geeks of the trivia…