dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: German Aircraft Camera Panel? Help needed #923384
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    That was my instant reaction, RF-84 Thunderflash. Nice item by the way Simon.

    Rob

    Edit.. The profile fits apart from the camera window position on this particular example[ATTACH=CONFIG]239676[/ATTACH]

    It’s from a G-91!!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]239679[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: German Aircraft Camera Panel? Help needed #923429
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    FIAT G-91?

    in reply to: Can you ID this plane? #846985
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    A cropped version of the top photo in the link makes it easier to see that it’s a Mustang or Apache.

    See Post #2.

    in reply to: Can you ID this plane? #847237
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    It is as it says, a P-51 – probably a P-51A (or possibly an A-36 Apache).

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Apologies for the repetition ! I have not been able to spend much time on here for a while, so am a bit out of touch.

    As a friendly prompt, none of you gents have started any threads since early June, so I reckon some new input would go down well if you have got anything πŸ˜‰

    Well I did hear about some Spitfires in Burma….

    In general I don’t start threads just for the fun of it, so unless I think of something worthwhile, that will be the status quo.

    πŸ˜€

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Nooooooo! Please not again!!!

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #849413
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Wh 904 has a good point,easy to dream up these schemes like the Academy and far harder to make them viable. Is there any evidence that there is a shortage of UK aviation engineering college places? Access to live side civil passenger airports is now very limited for good reason,safety and security so Finningley will be out for viewable taxi runs. It wont matter much once that last landings made, people will be calling at Newark rather than Finningley.

    Fully agree: the Academy idea verges on the naive, and though it’s laudable to think of ways with which to use XH558, it’s also the responsibility of those in charge to treat this aircraft in a manner which respects the thousands who have donated.

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #849631
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I take it that all the book publishers no longer payout an advance for a project? More likely just the royalties?

    My experience with published works to date is an initial payment on contract signing, another at manuscript delivery and a third at book publication. All are advances of royalties.

    Just recently another publisher contacted me to ask if I had another project going, and ready to go, we were in the early stages of negotiation. Then the ‘can you reduce the word count’ and ‘would you be prepared to contribute to costs’ questions crept in.

    I know it’s a different financial world we live in, but I also need the publisher to (a) have faith in the product and (b) understand that I’m NOT bringing yet another plagiarised ‘work’ to the table. The final offer was frankly an insult and so I withdrew at that point.

    So I suspect that advance payments may be a bit more infrequent nowadays, but I’d still stick to my guns on the point of the publisher having faith and taking the risk. If they won’t then they don’t understand the market and don’t understand the project which they have been discussing.

    Rant mode ‘off’.

    πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #849845
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    That sounds like Air Britain territory, very much the subject, length, style and price for their books.
    If you are serious about having a go at the HP42 I can point you in the direction of a number of original documents

    Well for now I’m looking into a few primary sources and already note a few discrepancies between these and the dreaded W*kipedia. That’s a good enough reason to get scribbling. I may be in touch!

    in reply to: Derelict Fairey Gannet #850135
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Not surprising if you look at the photos, Google Earth is your friend! πŸ˜€

    Found it – I wouldn’t have known otherwise though!

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #850147
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Although it would result in a somewhat dry tome it would be interesting to see a history of wind tunnel research. Parts of this are available in fragments from the likes of NPL, NACA and RAE but the tunnels built and run by commercial companies have received little attention. As their use, of lack thereof, was of increasing importance through the late 20s and 30s the subject is worthy or research.

    Some of these suggestions are indeed a bit ‘dry’ – I do feel a distinction should be made between ‘interesting to see’ and ‘nice to have’. I love technical books, but I think I’d be unlikely to buy a book about wind tunnels. No doubt the research would be of merit, but would it make anything other than a very niche reference work?

    However, I do feel that there’s thread going through this, er, thread – that there’s not much in-depth written about aviation in general prior to 1939.

    So is anyone out there already doing a book on the HP.42/45? I am sorely tempted to give it a go, ill-equipped though I am! And more importantly, is there a publisher out there prepared to commit to a minimum of 100,000 words, 200 photos, line drawings, colour side views, full histories of each aircraft built and a retail price of Β£50?

    It’s a book I’d buy.

    in reply to: Hurricane LF363 incident #850218
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153489986883622&set=pcb.10153486765049935&type=1&theater

    Hope the link works!

    Edit: Oops, Moggy beat me to it!

    Many thanks both.

    in reply to: Derelict Fairey Gannet #850262
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Strange: been to WW a number of times but never seen it. WW was a Fairey airfield too I recall?

    in reply to: Hurricane LF363 incident #850266
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Odd that this hasn’t been mentioned here.

    25th July 2015

    Paul Harvey > β€ŽRAF Coningsby Spotters Group

    Moggy

    …”first photo..”?

    in reply to: DHC-2 cn 672 #850269
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Sorry – I’ve sacked the typist – USAF should have read USAC. Built as an L-20A but re-designated U-6A in 1962.

    Aha. I hope the info was of use.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 1,675 total)