Since when is 150km short-range for a SAM?
Of course Cobras will be vulnerable to Tungstas, they have tactics to counter them, but inevitably we may suffer losses, it all depends if these losses are worth the net gain in armour destroyed and stopping any Indian thrust….. [/B]
Well, it’s quite hard to devise tactics to defeat an AA system that can destroy you with both it’s misisles and its guns before you can fire your TOW at it; those AH-1Fs need Hellfires (or preferably, something even better) to be competetive.
Definitely an Mi-24PN. I found larger versions of the same one (as well as others of the same aircraft) on Rostvertols website, which was down last time I checked.
I’d assume the camo pattern- IIRC, it’s used on all Su-24MK aircraft- including a regiment in Russia that uses them.
Originally posted by PAF Fan
Victor
I will do some digging around but I think the C NITE upgrade includes all weather capability as well as night fighting……
The C-NITE upgrade includes a FLIR of some kind- whether Pakistan is getting the AH-1Fs with C-NITE is another matter.
edit:
http://www.janes.com/defence/air_forces/news/jalw/jalw001013_2_n.shtml
It is reported that Pakistan has ordered C-NITE systems to upgrade its existing Cobra fleet.
That settles that.
Unfortunately, the AH-1F is still catastrophically obsolete anyway and so much 2S6M Tunguska fodder without much better missiles.
Originally posted by PAF Fan
Why would Pakistan want to buy Russian attack choppers whena) We have a pool of trained and experianced AH-1F pilots
b) We are about to receive 40 surplus AH-1Fs to add to the 20 we already have60 AH-1Fs will do Pakistan VERY nicely thank you very much…..
That’s like saying “we have 60 Mi-24Ds, we dont’ need AH-64s thanks very much”.
Originally posted by milavia
They were deployed to protect the Tu-22M bombers from possible air threats like Pakistani F-16s.
The Tu-16s were probably what were being protected- an F-16A would have trouble catching a Tu-22M2/3.
I just read an article that confirmed the MiG-29K will have the Zhuk-MEh radar (probably just an export version of Zhuk-M).
What is the Hip’s direct competitor from the USA? Blackhawk? [/B]
They’re both the ‘workhorse’, but the Mi-8 is a heavier aircraft capable of carrying much more. Perhaps something like the CH-53 or something. Haven’t really put much thought into it.
Originally posted by Indian1973
maybe on Mig29K too ?
I’d say that’s a practical certainty, good point. I can’t think of what other radar it’d be equipped with …
Originally posted by AirToAirCombat
Unless I’m mistaken, US bombers are no longer actively perform the nuclear mission, with the possible exception of 20 B-2s, which aren’t nuclear mission exclusive either.
That depends on what you mean by ‘actively perform’- the B-52 and B-2 are both fully nuclear strike capable and have ther weapons to do the job (the mysterious ACM and AGM-86B ALCM, as well as free-fall nukes). Sure, they don’t do it, doesn’t mean they aren’t meant to do it.
Originally posted by Vaiar
Don’t you think that the numbers speak for themselves? Or are these numbers totally wrong?
Note who these men are. Baltic Fleet aviation? It’s not the air force, it’s the navy. He should complain to CinC Kuroyedov of the Navy. It has nothing to do with Mikhaylov. It’s like the head of the USN complaining about the USAF.
In addition, nothing Kolyada said was in contradiction to what Mikhaylov said.
To suggest that Russia elminates an arm of the deterrent triad is sheer folly, sorry. And scrapping the Su-24s and Su-25s is sheer madness- you lose all your ground attack capability. Upgrading Su-27s and MiG-29s to drop bombs costs money, and they can’t perform CAS. Keeping and upgrading Su-24s and Su-25s costs less.
This is sour grapes. The evidence of increased activity is there for all to see, in practically all areas. Russian generals have been complaining about their lack of cash for over a decade now, I’m not saying they’re not legitimate grievances, but they have consistently and repeatedly overstated the problem to “the sky is falling! the sky is falling!” in order to garner media attention and lobby publically for increased funds- which is happening. They have called the alarm repeatedly over the last few years- where’s the huge decline they keep on prophesiszing? Things have remained largely constant, and are slowly, painfully, getting better.
Yeah, that screams “monochrome CRT” MFD to me, I doubt that cockpit will be the one we’ll see on the series builds.
How do we know the previous Yak-130 cockpit isn’t simply obsolete?