dark light

SolarWarden

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 242 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2146732
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    “about 100 miles northwest” is definitely Groom Lake. RIP Lt. Col. Shultz.

    Hopefully the TR-3B survived the impact.

    in reply to: General Discussion #227614
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    It looks like there is no more road to kick the can down. According to reports N Korea has just tested a hydrogen bomb that can be delivered by its ICBM. Too late to stop N Korea developing that capability through military action against the country. I would say that “diplomacy”(how to hurt N Korea as much as possible by non-military means) is the only road to walk down now. Is king Kim mad enough (I mean crazy, not angry) to attack US territory or assets? I don’t think so.
    ———————————

    The US is more than capable in taking out NK’s nuclear missile capability and program by conventional means. Of course Seoul would be hit by thousands of NK artillery rounds and rockets.

    in reply to: General Discussion #227749
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    The most important question to be asked in the Korean theatre is basically to the Japanese and the South Koreans, and that is —–> Are they ready to die to keep America safe.

    A second Korean war would be as bloody as the first, if not more. But unlike the first, the second Korean war is likely to bring to the table a real possibility of the bully getting punched in face (read continental US). This is what has unsettled the muricans and the hawks inside murica would love to fight to the last Korean and Japanese to keep continental America safe, but is that what the Japanese and Koreans want? I guess not.

    The First Korean war is known as the Forgotten War in the US, the second Korean war, if it happens, wont be.
    —————————–

    US has been very tolerant of North Korea’s antics as long as they weren’t a threat to the US mainland. US tolerated North Korea sinking a SK warship, tolerated the shelling of SK island, tolerated IRBM launches, tolerated NK building nuke weapons, and tolerated NK testing nuke weapons, all because they wren’t a threat to the US AND because Seoul was 30 miles from thousands of NK artillery pieces.

    That all changed (after knowing they weaponized a nuke warhead and didn’t tell us) when they tested a ballistic missile a few weeks ago that could very likely reach the US mainland. As long as NK could not reach us with a nuke tipped missile, US was restraint, but now the game has changed and NK crossed a line that President Trump said the US would not tolerate. This is not about South Korea anymore but the security of the US, and if Seoul has to be sacrificed to take out NK’s capability to hit the US with a nuke tipped missile, then so be it and too bad for Seoul for not moving its capital after the Korean war. I predict Trump will take action in early 2018 only because of the whispers I’m hearing at work (I’m a civilian tech for US Navy). I will not blame Trump for the mess that we’re about to get in, i blame the previous administrations for kicking the can.

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1785052
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    So we all know by know the Aim-9x was spoofed by Russian flares because Russian flares do not all have the same heat sig, i was wondering how is that problem fixed on the Aim-9x, software, or new seeker?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2152771
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    This should shut up the two folks in here who are having issues with “range calculations.”

    Something tells me after they watch the video, DUH, will still come out of their mouths.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2154812
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Here’s a youtube of the podcast (many thanks to Dragon029 for his time and great editing) for those who don’t have the strength to click on the site, then the podcast, an easier way to watch.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2155467
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    1st i check in here on this thread regulary to see if there is something intersting, as in NEWS on F-35.

    2nd. I’m on hollyday, wont waste a minute going trough such podcast. Especially when Sprey is on. What he is or was is not the point here, what he say or write is.
    3rd Is there any actuall news on that podcast; NO i guess.

    4th what you guys deem very interesting doesn’t mean its interesting.. get it!

    5th Solarwarden, who gives a flying @ss what you think is essentially on this thread or Forum.
    —————————–

    Yet you go out of your way to comment on a podcast you didn’t listen to/couldn’t care less of. That tells me the F-35 is messing with your head, bruh.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2155531
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Lol. You should have just kept quiet, haarvala, kinda look foolish. Now if you’d listen to the podcast (which i reckon are about 15-20 minutes each and not boring)
    then your ridiculous opinion would likely not be this harshly critiqued.

    Man the F-35 really has a negative affect on some people. nuts.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2155815
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Podcast: F-35 in the Crossfire – Retired Marine Lt. Col. David Berke, former F-35B and F-22 pilot vs Pierre Sprey, the troll who thinks the F-15 is a turkey.

    part-1
    http://aviationweek.com/defense/podcast-f-35-crossfire-part-1

    part-2
    http://aviationweek.com/combat-aircraft/podcast-f-35-crossfire-part-2

    Sprey got his a** handed to him by the Colonel, only thing i didn’t like is that he was too nice to Sprey – If it was me i’d discredit him off the bat by bringing up his F-15 and F-16 claim.

    part 2 is where he gets slapped. 😀

    Thanks to spaz (in another forum) for posting the podcast.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2193029
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Europe’s manned fighter program is all but dead. Soon Europe’s air force will be American made, which will also include the French in the near future when they finally realize their navy rafales are outdated for high-end IADS. No doubt i see a French F-35C in France’s naval future. They said Germany would never go for the F-35 and now they have ask for a classified briefing, wouldn’t be surprised if the French ask for one in the near future.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2208640
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    It is almost done. Now to get France to buy the F-35/turn do the dark-side, and the F-35 dominance of Europe will be complete.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2143862
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Is the B-21 going to have AMRAAM capability?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2149269
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    These are not dedicated “test planes” , and yes they do have 3I.

    Thanks for clarifying. Well then i guess if true, Israel used their F-35I’s.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2149303
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Why would they not use their own F-35?

    Aren’t the two test planes? Do they actually have 3i capability already?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2149374
    SolarWarden
    Participant

    Unconfirmed reports that F-35I were used in strikes against targets in Syria (including S-300).

    http://www.airforcesmonthly.com/2017/03/07/have-israels-new-f-35s-seen-combat/

    Alleged footage:
    https://mobile.twitter.com/AlbinSzakola/status/819711460997812224/video/1

    Edit- more from Syrian news with same video, this is either a game of telephone- news reporting the same unconfirmed report, mistaken intel, or Israel really used its two F-35. Considering the two arrived in December, I’d say it’s one of the two former.
    https://mobile.almasdarnews.com/article/video-footage-israeli-jets-attacking-damascus/

    I wouldn’t be surprised if these weren’t Israeli version F-35’s but USAF F-35A’s with a Star of David sticker. USAF F-35A’s have been combat ready for a year now with block 3i version. Are the two Dutch and Italian F-35’s combat able?

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 242 total)