dark light

vikraal

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 130 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Future of Russia's transport fleet #2594867
    vikraal
    Participant

    IL-214 or MTA has an assured order of atleast 50 aircrafts from India. I though russia was also interested in obtaining 80-100 of these.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2595681
    vikraal
    Participant

    There are already MLUes F-16’s on the market, get them its a lot simpler.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2595701
    vikraal
    Participant

    Why the hell are they buying F-16 A/B???

    in reply to: N-deal linked to acquisition of F-18s: Russian daily #2597497
    vikraal
    Participant

    Russia is already supplying uranium to india. Who the hell cares about the N-deal. Its just not worth the c grade F-18’s.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2597780
    vikraal
    Participant

    Hmmm joke of a air-force stays up on jinn powered aerodynamics. Don’t you infidels know this!!!

    in reply to: F16 vs Mirage2000 #2598686
    vikraal
    Participant

    The greek mirages routinely lock onto turkish F-16’s , The peace time bull**** is too old and just an attempt to hide the obvious. The Mirages have also embarrased the F-15’s in red flag excercises.

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2598687
    vikraal
    Participant

    The article has some substance but is mostly bull. But I do think the govt needs to Increase the pay of defence personnel rather than the stupid IAS officers and beaurocrats

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2598927
    vikraal
    Participant

    Hmmm so from griffo to chinese to french to BAE…..lets see what it actually comes with.

    in reply to: Phalcon and Erieye – A comparison #2601258
    vikraal
    Participant

    Indian phalcon would be on IL-76.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2601274
    vikraal
    Participant

    I am not denying that PAF may go for J-10 , but Iam only saying that the chinese avionics are not upto par and PAF knows this. The PLA excercises can be made to say anything, didn’t bisons do exceedingly well against F-16 blk52 of RSAF? It does not mean a bison is a much superior plane to F-16 blk 52. The J-10 option is a definite money saver and needed to replace the old obsolete planes like mirage-3/5 or A-5.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2601574
    vikraal
    Participant

    The follow up avionics for JF-17 has not been determined yet. It’s just speculation that they would go with Western avionics. 50/150, that’s a lot for an initial batch. Of course, Musharraf seemed to be extremely impressed by JF-17’s avionics and J-10 in his most recent trip to China.

    Really!! Or did he just realize he has very little options??

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2601620
    vikraal
    Participant

    May be not as good (based on lack of available info about J-10) and certainly not as mature. But i most definitely would not use words such as ‘No Match’ without knowing much about it. Primary reasons why PAF would prefer F-16 over J-10 would be ‘ease of integration’ and ‘mature technology’.

    The PAF must have been exposed to the J-10, so I don’t buy that they don’t know anything about it. I am sure if it was that good and could match the F-16’s PAF would have simply gone for J-10 alone which are politically and economically a much simpler option.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2601625
    vikraal
    Participant

    Point being? Are you agreeing with me that J-10 in all probability is no match for a modern flanker or F-16 blk 50+?

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2601627
    vikraal
    Participant

    Vikraal, didnt Mig-21 (i think it was Bison version) perform rather well against F-15s? Which is a better plane on paper?

    Did you check the restrictions under which the F-15’s operated? Do you think in an actual one on one combat a bison would survive, much less the chinese crap?

    MKI most definitely has those gizmos? Why does India want to introduce other types such as LCA/MMRCA?

    Sure it does, but then J-10 and Jf-17 are almost similar and fall in same category? Why does Jf-17 need different avionics from J-10,, simply because the chinese avionics is below par.

    Unless, i mistaken, current chinese radar for JF-17 is a derivative of J-10’s radar?

    Yes, and unless I am mistaken PAF has gone on record saying that only the initial batches will have chinese avionics, while they would prefer western ones. So is PAf lying?

    This was probably the most sensible comment in ur post. 🙂

    I am not denying that PAF will buy J-10, just that it seems to be checking out the aircraft first and I seriously doubt they would prefer it over F-16 blk 50+ if available without string and hefty price. 😀 .

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2601643
    vikraal
    Participant

    Ya sure J-10 beats flankers, got any more jokes to share? If the J-10 had all the gizmo and tech pakistan wouldn’t be running after russia, and US for other planes. Also why not use the avionics of J-10 for Jf-17? why look for grifo and other sources for avionics. Yes the J-10 would make an excellent replacement for Mirage3/5, it wouldn’t stand upto a F-16blk 50+ or modern flanker.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 130 total)