Thanks for the update, that’s good to hear.
“I believe the area is still owned by the MoD and managed by a local countryside trust”
MOd is the landowner
I think a bit of misinterpreatation of what Mark12 said has taken place earlier in the thread
The wingtips on real photos of MB411s appear to be ‘square cut’ rather than rounded tip, with quite a thick section (giving an optical illusion of curved in some shots). The ‘RN’ shot appears to have curved wingtips which appear to have ‘grab handles’.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]254115[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]254116[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]254117[/ATTACH]
The apparent fairing on the upper fuselage (Like a DH4A one friend noted!) also seems strange.
Found this:
“Throughout the rest of the war, 765 Squadron were stationed at Sandbank………..
Thanks Martin, that’s interesting. Certainly a lead to pursue. The modifications to the rear fuselage and the wing tips still make me wonder if this is a fake photo, but at least we have confirmation that it operated in the UK
Huh?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]254108[/ATTACH]
More than that the chimneys are actually being demolished and rebuilt
https://www.batterseapowerstation.co.uk/#!/go/view/app/chimney?view=updates
The roof will being going back on eventually
The Sea Vixen has some structural airframe compnents (e.g. engine mounts) that will have been directly affected. The bottom of the rear ones in particular.
I think the ‘avoid speculation’ genie is well and truely out the bottle, especially with things like Facebook etc. And it get’s people’s backs up. You only need to look at the antagonism that the attempts to censor the Victor hop at Bruntingthorpe caused.
The only practical military application for Concorde would probably have been as a VVIP transport* (or Quick reaction SF transport if you suddenly had to get a squad somewhere quickly)
The illustration above came from an article John WR Taylor wrote for the 1967 Yearbook called ‘A Bold Assessment of The Next 50 years’ – I’d love to see the full thing to see how accurate (if at all) his predictions were.
* Plus the high speed target it occasionally found itself used as.
Five years later – the family behind these amazing photographs has started a KickStarter Project to get a book published with the photographs. Its only right that those who enjoyed these photographs should now pay forward to have a hard copy in our libraries.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/640372561/clipped-wings-0/
(Usual disclaimer – No personal connection/gain here other than to have the book in my shelf)
Will do!
I cannot see your picture. Would you mind posting it again please.
Strange, I can see it
Most military WW2 explosives were relatively stable at normal temperatures, and would require the effect of a detonator to trigger the explosive reaction. I’ve not heard of any ‘just going off’ but obviously any percussive or handling event could trigger the detonator.
In addition to what’s under our towns and cities, there is also what’s at sea – mines and torpedoes are regularly washed/dragged up on beaches and in fishing nets. Then there is land forces munitions (Grenades, shells, bullets).
Tornado F3.
Could be an F2…. 🙂
Presumably, excepting the Shuttleworth Trust example, these F.2b’s would have been the ex-Boddington Wheelwright airframes from Weston-on-the-Green. If those two originated there, can someone tell me what has become of the other four airframes that were recovered from Mr Boddington’s barn in the 1960s?
On became the static example now on show at the RAF Museum
http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/collections/72-A-99-Bristol-Fighter.pdf
Also details the other 4’s fate – Canada, Brussels, Peter Jackson (x2) and South Yorks