Fascinating Photo Mark12, taken at the same time as Steve William’s one on Airliners.net I ppresume?
The Hurricane wasn’t a dead end per se – as already mentioned, there is a fair bit of similarity under the stressed skin on the front of the Typhoon, and there is a developmental line from that to the Hunter (some of which was on paper only, such as Jet Fury that eventually became P1040).
It’s also interesting to speculate how Mitchell might have developed his designs if he had lived
Allegedly one, surmised as SW500 of a 2TAF unit and 56 OTU. Like you, never seen a photo of it.
http://img.wp.scn.ru/camms/ar/463/pics/9_48.jpg
The tuft test Typhoon has been discussed before:
https://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?121483-Typhoon-aerodynamic-tests
Again, not aware of a photo of it – is Chris Thomas around per chance?
Beleived to be. Last time seen in public would have been Fairford in 2003 I think. Presumably still pretty much the same state as shown below
http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/swift/survivors/xf114fairford.jpg
Or Montrose, but i doubt they’d have the space either
Re SAAF ones, I meant disposed of straight to scrap rather than through the usual Everret/Witham etc disposal route (and with a degree of secrecy too). And I was using it as an illustration of how rare Pumas have been on the disposal market
Didn’t the MOD send the unused ex-SAAF airframes straight to scrap? Wonder what ahppened to the others not updated to HC2 standard?
Speaking of Bruntingthorpe and Meteors, I always fouind this story that Whittle had flown one of the remaining f1s in 1954 a little unlikely – anyone know?
Whittle would naturally have been a fairly frequent visitor, and on 19 October 1954 flew one of the two remaining Meteors, despite not being cleared to do so.
From p.11 http://www.rafanddfsa.co.uk/Nov16.pdf
Regarding buried parts etc, the finds of the Freeman Field Recovery team shows that this isn’t neccessarily all ‘myth’. That said, even they have only found bits and pieces so far, but they are significant (Not least parts of the Napier Sabre from what is now the RAFM Typhhon)
There is not a lot of published information about this. Info in the National Archives seems to be mainly to do with purchase and in Foreign Office files (It was early in the War in Dec 1939 rather than pre-War). This link has some information, especially about the political nature of the proposed buy (in terms of keeping Italy out the War)
http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=28572
I always envisaged the Re2000s would have been shipped to Mid East or Far East if they had been delivered. If you wnat to play what-if regarding engines, an American engine might be a possibility.
RAFRochford – will try, my Hyperscale login is a bit flakey these days – I did draw the attention of a couple of known P-40 researchers to this vid
1:30 – the original factory Earth/Green and Sky under the wing root fairing. Something researchers have been argueing about for years.
And later on, clear view of Sky wing undersides overpainted with Azure blue
This was such a time capsule and important research artefact.
The International Gillespie Holiday And Recreation fund
My understanding is that the UK Govt gave up title to all wrecks/crashed aircraft, and the PMR Act was brought in to prevent wholesale digging up of what might be war graves. Thatr’s why the wreckage in the UK is protected. The USN, on the other had, retains title to all it’s crashed aircraft.
Quoting Propstrike:
Seems odd that the RAFM team, who presumably took a full photographic record of their activities, never placed any such images in the public domain despite huge public interest in the undertaking.
Perhaps there was concern that interest would be aroused in Egypt, risking growing sentiment it should remain in the country.
The RAFM has said vey little if anything, in public about their involvement. Thir involvement in the recovery was only confirmed by Kennet, indeed it took lectures that Kennet gave in the US before there was any confirmation as to what had actually happened. Beyond a planning apploication regarding the intended display of the P-40, RAFM said nothing about it’s involvement or plans until the Annual Report came out