dark light

DaveF68

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,578 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: North East Aircraft Museum…..updates #1243090
    DaveF68
    Participant

    What happened to the Brigand fuselage that was at NEAM?

    Mark

    Went to the Bristol Collection at Kemble IIRC

    in reply to: Comet XM823 #1252194
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Never heard of XM823 being painted black, or seen any photos of her in that colour. Believe Cosford are going to repaint her back in the scheme shown in your link and may possibly add “RAF Transport Command” titles under ‘poetic licence’!

    They don’t need the poetic licence bit – fits right in to their R&D Collection.

    If only they’d preserved Viscounts XT661 or XT575

    in reply to: Comet XM823 #1252199
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Oh WOW!

    Many, many thanks Arthur, exactly what I was looking for!

    Anyone else think the dayglo carries on across the engine bays?

    in reply to: Failed aircraft recoveries #1264973
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Hi Elliott,

    I did follow it up and unfortunatly it was melted down. Why the “Boston Havoc Trust”,as a preservation group and BAAC member scrapped the wing without offering to anyone is a question I would like an answer to myself.

    Garry.

    Pure speculation, but finance?

    in reply to: Vulcan RATOG use ? #1271791
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Strange this one should re-surrect now – look what popped up on PPrune last week

    http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=279464

    in reply to: Comet XM823 #1274240
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Bump just in case!

    in reply to: Western aircraft in Soviet hands #1281251
    DaveF68
    Participant

    There were ex-Vietnamese F-5s in both Poland and Czechoslovakia, supplied to enable the aircraft industry in those countries to examine Western aircraft construction and technology. there is no doubt that other US aircraft were examined, but little evidence (so far) that many, if any were test flown in Russia.

    There are some ‘dodgy’ photos on the web showing, amongst other things, a Vampire in Soviet markings (alleged ex-Iraqi) and of course the fabled Russian Tomcats (allegedly supplied by Iran).

    The shapes seen at a Russian air base were convincing mock-ups

    in reply to: US/USSR coup de grace #1281256
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I don’t think any of them. The Mig-15 was important in gaining an advantage in Korea, similarly the Mig-21 that the Israelis captured and lent to the Americans was useful in the late 60s/early 70s.

    But in the main they just helped refine and develop tactics.

    in reply to: What was there before the engineless 707? #1281267
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Very nice, but as the web page belongs to a fictional country it isn’t a definitive answer.

    It certainly gives an example of what it might have looked like.

    Moggy

    It is the style that warning signs were before the modern pictogram ones came in – althouth I’m not sure they would have had the aircraft sillouette either.

    Just the warning triangle with the text in a rectangle underneath.

    in reply to: Spitfire PR XIX at 51,000 ft? #1316401
    DaveF68
    Participant

    The story was repeated in the issue ofWings of Fame as well.
    Flt Lt Powes was also the pilot who flew the Spit XIX on penetration flights over the Chinese mainland.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Proctors #1317180
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Very interesting Dustyone! I assumed from the b/w photos they were in RAF camouflage of dk earth/dk green with yellow undersides, but the colours you describe make more sense. Can you confirm the undersides as ‘duck egg blue’, rather than duck egg green (alias ‘Sky type S’) and do you, or anyone have any photos?

    The colour shot above is in that scheme (Temperate Sea Scheme)

    Admiralty Orders in 1942(ish) stated that FAA Comms types had to be painted thus (or with yellow undersides) – superceding AMOs which said Green/Earth

    in reply to: Long Marston collection Don't do this!!! #1319182
    DaveF68
    Participant

    There’s also a Health & Safety consideration – especially crawling around in old aircraft which may not be in the best of conditions. Now the UE may accept the risk, but would his family feel the same way if he was killed whilst ‘exploring inside’ an aircraft he shouldn’t have been in?

    Would they sue the owners for not ensuring no-one could get in?

    in reply to: RAF Beech C-45 Expeditor's #1323510
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Pictures of RAF Expeditors are pretty rare – there is a well used photo of an HB serialed aircraft in camouflage in SEAC markings, but the underside colour is a slight mystery – by the current APs of the time it should have been yellow undersides, but SEAC had their own rules for somethings.

    I doubt sky blue, and wonder is it was actually Sky or Medium Sea Grey.

    Later RAF ones flew in natural metal with SEAC roundels.

    RN wartime Expeditors were in Temperate Sea Scheme of Extra dark Sea Grey and Dark Slate grey over Yellow undersides. Some had yellow outlined serials. Post war they were natural metal or dark blue

    in reply to: Andover C1 and CC2 #1323524
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Not sure who XS637 was with in the mid 80s (32 Squadron?) but she carried a fairly unique interpretation of the ‘classic’ scheme

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0749082/L/

    At least one (32 Squadron) aircraft also carried the low-viz light grey with pale blue cheatline scheme,

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0856900/L/

    and one with 51 Squadron carried the European tactical scheme.

    But to answer the original question, the C1s enetered service with the desert camo scheme

    in reply to: Hunter XL565 colour sceme info. #1327808
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Which reminds me – I forgot to say that BS381C-241 was later re-numbered to 641. So don’t get confused, 241 and 641 are the same thing.

    Other way about – was 641, later 241.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,578 total)