What happened to the Brigand fuselage that was at NEAM?
Mark
Went to the Bristol Collection at Kemble IIRC
Never heard of XM823 being painted black, or seen any photos of her in that colour. Believe Cosford are going to repaint her back in the scheme shown in your link and may possibly add “RAF Transport Command” titles under ‘poetic licence’!
They don’t need the poetic licence bit – fits right in to their R&D Collection.
If only they’d preserved Viscounts XT661 or XT575
Oh WOW!
Many, many thanks Arthur, exactly what I was looking for!
Anyone else think the dayglo carries on across the engine bays?
Hi Elliott,
I did follow it up and unfortunatly it was melted down. Why the “Boston Havoc Trust”,as a preservation group and BAAC member scrapped the wing without offering to anyone is a question I would like an answer to myself.
Garry.
Pure speculation, but finance?
Strange this one should re-surrect now – look what popped up on PPrune last week
Bump just in case!
There were ex-Vietnamese F-5s in both Poland and Czechoslovakia, supplied to enable the aircraft industry in those countries to examine Western aircraft construction and technology. there is no doubt that other US aircraft were examined, but little evidence (so far) that many, if any were test flown in Russia.
There are some ‘dodgy’ photos on the web showing, amongst other things, a Vampire in Soviet markings (alleged ex-Iraqi) and of course the fabled Russian Tomcats (allegedly supplied by Iran).
The shapes seen at a Russian air base were convincing mock-ups
I don’t think any of them. The Mig-15 was important in gaining an advantage in Korea, similarly the Mig-21 that the Israelis captured and lent to the Americans was useful in the late 60s/early 70s.
But in the main they just helped refine and develop tactics.
Very nice, but as the web page belongs to a fictional country it isn’t a definitive answer.
It certainly gives an example of what it might have looked like.
Moggy
It is the style that warning signs were before the modern pictogram ones came in – althouth I’m not sure they would have had the aircraft sillouette either.
Just the warning triangle with the text in a rectangle underneath.
The story was repeated in the issue ofWings of Fame as well.
Flt Lt Powes was also the pilot who flew the Spit XIX on penetration flights over the Chinese mainland.
Very interesting Dustyone! I assumed from the b/w photos they were in RAF camouflage of dk earth/dk green with yellow undersides, but the colours you describe make more sense. Can you confirm the undersides as ‘duck egg blue’, rather than duck egg green (alias ‘Sky type S’) and do you, or anyone have any photos?
The colour shot above is in that scheme (Temperate Sea Scheme)
Admiralty Orders in 1942(ish) stated that FAA Comms types had to be painted thus (or with yellow undersides) – superceding AMOs which said Green/Earth
There’s also a Health & Safety consideration – especially crawling around in old aircraft which may not be in the best of conditions. Now the UE may accept the risk, but would his family feel the same way if he was killed whilst ‘exploring inside’ an aircraft he shouldn’t have been in?
Would they sue the owners for not ensuring no-one could get in?
Pictures of RAF Expeditors are pretty rare – there is a well used photo of an HB serialed aircraft in camouflage in SEAC markings, but the underside colour is a slight mystery – by the current APs of the time it should have been yellow undersides, but SEAC had their own rules for somethings.
I doubt sky blue, and wonder is it was actually Sky or Medium Sea Grey.
Later RAF ones flew in natural metal with SEAC roundels.
RN wartime Expeditors were in Temperate Sea Scheme of Extra dark Sea Grey and Dark Slate grey over Yellow undersides. Some had yellow outlined serials. Post war they were natural metal or dark blue
Not sure who XS637 was with in the mid 80s (32 Squadron?) but she carried a fairly unique interpretation of the ‘classic’ scheme
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0749082/L/
At least one (32 Squadron) aircraft also carried the low-viz light grey with pale blue cheatline scheme,
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0856900/L/
and one with 51 Squadron carried the European tactical scheme.
But to answer the original question, the C1s enetered service with the desert camo scheme
Which reminds me – I forgot to say that BS381C-241 was later re-numbered to 641. So don’t get confused, 241 and 641 are the same thing.
Other way about – was 641, later 241.