dark light

Wombat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 463 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Driving in Iraq #1992046
    Wombat
    Participant

    Lighten up, Geforce

    Geforce old son,

    Is there ANYTHING on this forum which doesn’t press your button?

    I love the photo of the French forces in training, no doubt to music of

    “Oh, we do like to be beside the seaside….”

    Sort of fits in with another post of mine tonight.

    Ribbit, ribbit!!!!

    Regards

    Wombat:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #426316
    Wombat
    Participant

    Moggy,

    You ARE a cheeky bugger….

    Wombat;)

    in reply to: Question #1992051
    Wombat
    Participant

    Moggy,

    You ARE a cheeky bugger….

    Wombat;)

    in reply to: Future replacement for Merlin? #2085299
    Wombat
    Participant

    Probably only weighs about one tenth what a Merlin does, too. Certainly has the looks.

    Wombat

    in reply to: Spooky! #2085581
    Wombat
    Participant

    Webmaster, your silence is deafening

    Come on old son – you have always endeavoured to be most helpful in the past and have been very prompt when your help was sought.

    Now I think the members of this forum at least deserve some sort of explanation for the original thread being pulled. I don’t accept that the editorial staff of Flypast are so paranoid that minor criticisim cannot be accepted and I find it very hard to believe that Moggy’s comment could have been so offensive or insensitive that it merited killing off the thread.

    As you can see from this thread, people want to know why. I want to know why.

    I think we deserve better. Why have you ignored us on this matter?

    Regards

    Wombat

    in reply to: Spooky! #2086498
    Wombat
    Participant

    Webmaster, you have the floor…

    Well, guys, I’d certainly like to know why the thread was pulled too, especially as I had already put in my two bob’s worth and found it to be interesting.

    It was also a good deal more innocuous than some of the other threads which have gone around recently.

    Come on Webmaster, you had a number of senior and well respected members contributing to this thread – I too think at least some sort of explanation is warranted.

    The floor, sir, is yours…

    Regards

    Wombat

    in reply to: General Discussion #371373
    Wombat
    Participant

    Too fast for my damned keyboard

    About thirty years ago, my employer actually paid me for four months to learn to type. I now run around 45-50 words per minute on a good day, and sometimes beat my keyboard.

    Bet you never saw a four-footed typist with three toes on each foot before!;)

    Regards

    Wombat

    in reply to: How fast do you type? #1956788
    Wombat
    Participant

    Too fast for my damned keyboard

    About thirty years ago, my employer actually paid me for four months to learn to type. I now run around 45-50 words per minute on a good day, and sometimes beat my keyboard.

    Bet you never saw a four-footed typist with three toes on each foot before!;)

    Regards

    Wombat

    in reply to: Which Luftwaffe WWII Fighter? #2087772
    Wombat
    Participant

    I have three favourites.

    Top of the pops is definitely the 262. A far more aggessive looking, sleeker design that its Allied counterparts, held back only by the unreliability of its engines and shortage of fuel. Higher speed than the Meteor, P-59 or P-80 and design features well ahead of all of them.

    For the piston engined aircraft, definitely divided between the Ta-152 and the Do-335. The Dornier in particular is an intriguing machine and had excellent performance. Both it and the Ta-152 were more than a match for any Allied piston engined aircraft of the time, but they suffered from the same fuel shortage problems as the 262.

    Astonishing aircraft, all of them.

    Regards

    Wombat

    in reply to: General Discussion #378509
    Wombat
    Participant

    RE: Really silly question

    For that answer, we need somebody from either Africa or South America – there isn’t much else in the Southern Hemisphere except NZ and a lot of islands, and NZ drives on the left, too.

    Wombat

    in reply to: Really silly question #1961965
    Wombat
    Participant

    RE: Really silly question

    For that answer, we need somebody from either Africa or South America – there isn’t much else in the Southern Hemisphere except NZ and a lot of islands, and NZ drives on the left, too.

    Wombat

    in reply to: General Discussion #378514
    Wombat
    Participant

    RE: Hello

    Nahh, I doubt he would be able to understand most of it…too many words over four letters in length.

    Wombat

    in reply to: Hello #1961969
    Wombat
    Participant

    RE: Hello

    Nahh, I doubt he would be able to understand most of it…too many words over four letters in length.

    Wombat

    in reply to: Most and least changed #2091384
    Wombat
    Participant

    RE: Most and least changed

    Fellows,

    Neither the Lanc nor the Lancastrian fit the criteria. The Lancastrian was a transport, and as I said, they seldom changed much over their working lives, so they were out.

    The Lanc didn’t fly until well after the war commenced, though the Manchester did. However, as the Lanc was DIRECTLY related to and evolved from the Manchester, it’s fair to say that its appearance changed dramatically over its entire service life, so I’m not sure if it should be excluded from “least changed” and considered for “most changed”.

    Let’s not bog down with this individual aircraft – any other nominees for most/least?

    I agree with Ant that the Spitfire changed totally during its life, yet somehow retained its overall characteristic shape. A nominee for “most changed” for sure.

    P-51? Nup – cutting down the rear fuselage and upgrading to a Merlin spelled out the majority of the changes – later production versions had taller fins or lightweight construction, but the P-51 prototype didn’t fly until 1940 or thereabouts, anyway. Doesn’t rate in this competition.

    P-40? Later versions were definitely different around the nose, and they even tried a bubble canopy, though I can’t remember if the bubble canopy entered service or remained experimental. In the running for “most changed”.

    Stuka? Same as the P-40. By 1939, the Ju-87B was in service, and it finished the war as a Ju-87D or G, which was extensively changed around the nose. An also ran, perhaps.

    FW-189? When did it first fly? A good nomination, but does it meet the criteria.

    Anyway, keep them coming.
    Regards

    Wombat

    in reply to: General Discussion #378536
    Wombat
    Participant

    RE: Hello

    Hi Snapper,

    You weren’t alone in your thoughts – I thought Pigeon man was Hellaid V3.0 or whatever he/she is up to now, but it appears that Hellaid is known personally(one way or t’other) by somebody else in the form.

    They are obviously the best of “friends”, so I propose to sit back and watch them slug it out on the forum over coming weeks.

    Regards

    Wombat

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 463 total)