I, for one, don’t have a problem with, and indeed applaud, “new build” warbirds. What does not rest easy with me however is such builds assuming the identity of an aircraft that was excavated from a deep hole in the ground and then also claiming that aircrafts history.
Ukraine is a large country (one of the largest in Europe if you discount Russia) and the fighting is taking place in a limited area in the far east. Of course there are rocket strikes outside of that area.
Not all the population is actively engaged in the fighting and the people that aren’t, need to try to have as normal a life as is possible including continuing with their economic activity and their “hobby” interests.
I’ve just seen an item on BBC Breakfast about this. Video shot on site showing the excavation and removal of a large part of wing structure. Then video of parts being washed off outside a museum where they hope to recreate one Hurricane for display.
The Stearman has just departed Lee for Sandown IOW.
Bright red Stearman N4889V visited Lee On Solent yesterday and did a few noisy circuits.
The wheel does not match the picture of a Swift wheel on this site.
https://www.herefordvoice.co.uk/forums/topic/2404-restoration-photos-of…
Spitfire TIX G-TCHI currently doing circuits/pleasure flights from Lee-On-Solent.
Airfield, you say that you have a “wheel” rather than just the tyre. A picture of the wheel would help us identify it.
If mustard or any other chemical warfare agent had been used operationally by either side in WW2 it would have been a very big deal and would be widely known about now.
If any British serviceman was exposed to mustard agent in WW2 it must have been as the result of an accident.
There was some limited testing of mustard in very controlled circumstances on “volunteer” servicemen in the USA during WW2. Maybe also in the UK?
The Allies certainly had stocks of liquid mustard agent. See the tragic Bari incident. The stated policy was that the agent (or any other chemical weapon) would not be used unless the Axis powers used it first. I have never heard of mustard actually being used by either side.
It is of course quite possible that members of the armed forces were exposed to mustard agent accidently.
My father was serving on the destroyer H.M.S. Brecon and they were deployed to Bari the day after the air raid and subsequent explosion of the ship carrying the mustard bombs in order to enforce the marshal law that had been imposed. He said very little about it, but it was obviously terrible. The fact that the ship was carrying mustard was secret and only known to the master and the senior navy officer, both of whom were killed in the explosion. Therefore, the medical staff had no idea of how to treat those who had been exposed to the mustard.
Jungmeister G-ARPX in Spanish military markings has just departed Lee-On-Solent.
Spitfire TIX G-ILDA has been flying from Lee-On-Solent all day.
The same Beech Expeditor has just rumbled over Fareham after departing Bembridge IOW.
See today in an “Antiques” arcade near me.
The folded sheet metal item on the left is described as ME109 cable clip. The instrument in the middle is described as being JU52. The instrument partly obscured at the back is left and right tank fuel gauge.
“I would guess looking at the colour this is more to do with the Navy rather then aviation ? I think the word ‘Periscope’ is a giveaway”
Having a periscope in an aircraft is not uncommon. For example, Charles Lindberg’s “Spirit of St Louis” had one, VC10s had one which could be fitted in four locations, and at least some of the V bombers had them.
The periscope in question seems much longer than others I have seen.