dark light

Smith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 1,284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Winter Maintenance…Round 2 #1406029
    Smith
    Participant

    Jeez that thing’s in good nick …

    in reply to: General Discussion #403869
    Smith
    Participant

    Don’t fall for this old convivial trick – it’s never safe out in the Wild Net 😎

    in reply to: Yet another Australian Coup!!! Thunderbolt New arrival #1406060
    Smith
    Participant

    This is indeed excellent news – thank you for posting Setter – nice artwork too!

    in reply to: Seeing each other in RAF Night Bomber formations #1407235
    Smith
    Participant

    That was not required … or helpful …

    edit .. let me repeat myself more clearly. That pathetic comment is clearly nothing other than inflammatory – and simply was not necessary. For some curious reason tempers or nerves were badly frayed on 1 December. It was a temporary aberration and as far as I know has not seen here before to such a widespread degree. This may or may not have been to do with the server downtime interruption – who can tell. But apologies were made and people have slept on it. Fin!

    in reply to: P40 F soon to fly in Australia and another is about to fly #1407473
    Smith
    Participant

    Still kind-of slightly missing my point but that’s alright. My question is really a rhetoric one for a pub or some such place. Personally I’m really enjoying seeing more and more things that don’t have Merlins in them (nothing against Merlins, just that they’re everywhere) come back to life – some/many of them new build but that’s OK. And I wouldn’t change a Buchon – it should be what it is – but I do think they look much better with the Hispano engine in them!

    Setter, sorry for drifting your thread a wee bit off topic – I didn’t appreciate initially that there was/is such a thing as a Merlin engined P40 – my ignorance, now rectified.

    in reply to: B-17 B-24 Bomber Webshot album #1407477
    Smith
    Participant

    Ah – I don’t see too much chance getting bored by stuff like this – nice one Jim

    in reply to: P40 F soon to fly in Australia and another is about to fly #1407500
    Smith
    Participant

    Thanks for that – I didn’t of course mean literally that everything is Merlin powered. It’s just that I notice lots of Merlin powered aircraft on the Warbird scene. I daresay winning the war helped in that regard (as in the lack of destruction of manufacturing capability, and lots of intact aircraft and engines and spares etc.) so maybe that accounts for it in part.

    This thought/question actually came to me initially in JDKs model Buchon thread, where I have left a similar open question – why the Merlin (instead of Hispano engine in that particular circumstance)?

    in reply to: Possible forum meet in Australia #1407535
    Smith
    Participant

    … and if you’re driving (or private flying) up from Melbourne don’t miss all the stuff going on at Wangaratta.
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=531806&posted=1#post531806

    in reply to: Wangarratta Airworld Restorations – Great Photos!!! #1407538
    Smith
    Participant

    Wow – and thanks Setter for pointing me this way – I missed it the thread for some reason. Seems to me there’s an obvious visit here on the way to or from Temora for Melbournians (and persons flying from o/s).

    Possible forum meet in Australia thread
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=34988

    in reply to: P40 F soon to fly in Australia and another is about to fly #1407548
    Smith
    Participant

    Cheers Setter …. a ki61 – where? Any web-links?

    in reply to: P40 F soon to fly in Australia and another is about to fly #1407673
    Smith
    Participant

    There’s a penny very slowly dropping for me over these few months I’ve inhabited this place. This P40 is Merlin powered. Everything seems to be Merlin powered. Why?
    Is it because …
    – there’s a thriving rebuild, parts market?
    – there’s a lot of crankcases or other fundamental parts about the place?
    – they’re better (if so, in what way)?
    – they’re cheaper?
    – there’s not really anything else?

    in reply to: General Discussion #404515
    Smith
    Participant

    … and I didn’t say that a moderator should not be able/allowed to comment .. nor do I fail to appreciate moderators, au contraire, it’s a hell of a job and we all (or I anyway) thank you immensely for being prepared to take it on.

    May I respectfully suggest as a thought starter for consideration by the moderators and the webmaster …
    – that there be some sort of distinct moderator IDs used for moderating duties
    – by that I mean another id – not an existing personal ID – so then people know they are debating with a personal identity – that does not speak for the forum or whatever
    – that if a moderator contributes a personal opinion on any given thread, the moderating duties re. that thread are assumed by the other moderator of that sub-forum (to avoid conflicts of interest – and much as FrankVW has done here in the last day or two)

    in reply to: General Discussion #404580
    Smith
    Participant

    Come on you guys … 0.32 seconds, Google
    “Unaware of local names, Surveyor General Andrew Waugh proposed to name the mountain after his predecessor, George Everest. This name prevailed until today, although the mountain has two local names – Chomolungma in Tibetan, Sagarmatha in Nepali.”

    in reply to: General Discussion #404638
    Smith
    Participant

    Having both read and briefly contributed to SRP’s pulled thread, I concur this is exactly the point being made. We then went on (as elsewhere here today, including above) to suggest, inter alia, that the moderator role should ideally be distinct (ie. neutral). I hope after all this that there will be a moderator huddle in which these issues are considered.

    in reply to: General Discussion #404667
    Smith
    Participant

    LUXURY RESORT HALTED

    A victory in the fight to stop an American billionaire building a luxury lodge on iconic Cape Kidnappers has been hailed as a “win for all New Zealanders”.

    The court, headed by Judge Craig Thompson, said though the proposal had much to recommend it, but was in the wrong place.

    “Its economic effects, through employment, the provision of services and supplies and the attraction of people with high discretionary spending power would be positive … the problem is not the concept in the abstract, the problem is its location.”

    The council’s district plan identified the site as an outstanding natural feature so the court could not permit a development unless it could ensure adverse effects were minor.

    Judge Thompson said building chalets, a swimming pool, roads and paths and a car park would have adverse effects.

    “The cape … is a unique iconic landscape with intense amenity values. It takes little that is man-made to jar there.”

    comment … the sheer volume of interest in NZ coastal property, particularly from the USA, and even more so since the recent election there, is amazing. Problem is that big money drives up prices beyond levels the local economy (small coastal towns, farms, etc.) can support or compete. Result is a transfer of amenity value for financial value which many struggle with. Respondent argument is that coastal land is a fixed-volume commodity and will reach world price levels anywhere in due course. ’tis the stuff of revolutions since time immemorial.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 1,284 total)