dark light

Supermarine305

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 337 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B-36 Peacemakers in the UK #814559
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Not forgetting the B-36 crash in Wiltshire.

    Fortunately with no fatalities.

    in reply to: An Interesting Letter from 1945 #817414
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I suspect War Prizes would be a good place to look for axis aircraft that were set aside for perservation (or were planned to at least).

    I remember the BP Defiant N1671 was set aside for preservation early on. I had a check on its individual history on the RAFM site. Found this relevent passage:

    On 28 Aug 44 No.52 MU packed `for Museum purposes’ Spitfire Mk.1s K9942 and X4590, now at Cosford and Hendon respectively. Also during the month the same unit handled Spitfire Mk.1As P9444 (now with the Science Museum) and R6915 (now at the Imperial War Museum). Also at Cardiff that August were Hurricane Mk.1s P2617 (now at Hendon) and L1592 (Now at the Science Museum) – these and the Defiant were part of a concerted effort initiated by the Air Historical Branch in March 1944 to assemble representative examples of Battle of Britain aircraft for museum preservation, namely several Spitfires, the two Hurricanes and the Defiant. That month the unit also packed Fiat CR42 MM5701, now at Hendon, and in September the unit handled Bf109E 4101 again now at Hendon, on behalf of the AHB.

    in reply to: Central Air force Museum, Moscow 20/10 #817416
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    You would have thought that with the resurgent nationalism in Russia and its softening attitude towards its Soviet years greater care would be taken of its aviation history.

    in reply to: An Interesting Letter from 1945 #817592
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Why assume it was never acted upon?
    Aircraft both of the RAF and captured Axis examples were set aside, both partial and complete. As are models, weapons, uniforms, engines and personal artifacts. Maps, plans, photos, aircrew records and the paperwork of war are set aside in archives.

    Just that not as much as we’d have liked in hindsight was preserved. Nor has everything set aside for preservation survived.

    in reply to: RAF Phantom Survivors & Their Future… #818187
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Well raised points.

    Just the paint miss-match of the two Phantoms irritates the inner pedant in me.

    in reply to: Pilot seat!!!!!!! #818202
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Could it be off a Junkers Ju188?

    in reply to: RAF Phantom Survivors & Their Future… #818495
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Yet the IWM has ex RAF F-4J ZE359 painted in US Navy colours.

    A swap with East Fortune would not be out impossible. Just pricey.

    in reply to: Rootes Blenheim (Bisley) MkV hatch ? #821442
    Supermarine305
    Participant
    in reply to: Australian news #823680
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I wish them all the best. Not a pretty aircraft but deserving of more attention.

    However ‘Mirage Hobby PZL P11z’ probably indicating the first hit journalist got whilst a-Googling the plane.

    in reply to: Glen Miller Wasn't Killed By RAF Lancasters? #826152
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    My conduct in tis htread has not been the best.

    I opened it up as an intersting alternative theory behind one of aviation’s more enduring mysteries. And more importantly is sounded plausable.
    Then some forum heavyweights got involed, voice suspician and I changed my tune. But why should I have?
    For instance I went on the attack quoting a source from the Daily Mail. Not the most reliable publication. But also the story was that a young boy of 17 had seen a Norseman fly over at a time and location that might well have been Miller’s. In of itself far from conclusive. But why should I have assumned that 17-year-old’s aircraft recognition -and time keeping- skills be any less than that of the aircrew of an RAF Lancaster especially he would have been in far more optimal situation to spot, track and identify an aicraft.
    What has been added does seem to my inexpert eye entirely likely. I will backtrack on my hostility and give this the benenfit of the doubt. Even though conclusive proof is probably never going to arise.

    in reply to: Another Amelia Theory of Disappearance #827771
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Let the scrying continue. Surely staring at Google Earth and seeing patterns in the random patterns of colour in the empty ocean is the 21st C. equivalent.

    Putting aside all the stuff about refraction; suppose Amelia Earhart had ditched her aircraft intact on the ocean -and Earhart was the lady to do that- there is then the 80 years of deterioration since to think about. If the Electra is in water shallow enough to be seen from high up then that is pretty shallow water, full of heat and currents and life. There are 8o years of storms churning the water and currents burying things under sand. There is 80 years of saltwater doing wicked things to the airframe. And there is 80 years of life clinging to and growing on the aircraft and turning it into an artificial reef. At this late stage, assuming Earhart’s aircraft is sat underwater in one piece would you even be able to tell its an aircraft unless you get up close?

    in reply to: Glen Miller Wasn't Killed By RAF Lancasters? #829471
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Thank you for taking the time to reply.

    One thing puzzling me is the different reports on what the weather was like that day. Surely they can’t be that different even given the alleged short period in time

    in reply to: Aircraft tyres #830321
    Supermarine305
    Participant
    in reply to: Rescue of a Heinkel HE-115. Video #832906
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    The preservation and restoration of 8L+FH can be followed -via Google Translate- here.

    in reply to: DH Sea Hornet -A Survivor? #833390
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Thank heavens something is happening to the mortal remains of TT193.

    But how much realistically can be used in a flyable airframe? Its been in a landing accident then dumped outside in the Albertian climate for years.

    But before I come across as too downbeat I wish Pioneer Aero Restorations every success.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 337 total)