Thank you. Makes sense and would be A24B 42-54643.
Of course Mr Weeks luck doesn’t take away from the very real human impact and deaths from Irma.
I can safely speak for everyone when I say ‘Phew!’
Good to se the damage was limited to broken signs and soggy carpets.
P.S. What is that fuselage in the works Kermit passes in 14:42?
I still think the RAFM biggest problems is being spit into two different sites. You can never tell the history of the RAF that way iunless you have a duplicate collection.
Of course this aimchair expert hasn’t a clue on where the best location for the RAFM would be. Hendon would be too small. Cosford perhaps too remote, but also the lenght of the runways has been a problem in flying in some larger types.
On the subject of space at Duxford some wise soul on these forums did suggest moving the Science Museum’s reserve collection there from wroughton.
I do wonder with that attitide how many rescuers in Houstion had a gun pointed at them recently?
And typos a-plenty can still be found.
Anyway, just moving on, regretting posting this threa and all. A little searching found this on the Daily Mail. Not ‘fail’ Snapper, no matter how apt.
Long story short, over fives years ago the self same Daniel Spragg considers a note jotted by a 17-year-old near Reading of a Norsemen flying ESE was key against the jettisoned bombs theory.That’s just weak.
Actually physically protect this Stirling? No-one of course. It would be pure chance if someone were prosecuted for deliberately disturbing it. It has no doubt been accidentally ravaged by numerous fishing nets over the decades.
Unlike the Jutland wrecks though this Stirling’s going to have low scrap value and that is what will probably save it from illegal salvage.
Rosevidnesy: That’s fine. I should have added the usual caveat that I have in no way anything to do with this book. The article just happened to have something about an aviation mystery to it.
At $35 I am not going to be the one to judge how well researched it is. I am not that keen on Miller.
Point me toward any national news organisation that is of ‘irrefutable aviation history knowledge’. 🙂
I ran across this story and I though it had some legs, notwithstanding the impending book publication. There is a thread somewhere about the jettisoned bomb theory and perhaps in hindsight I should have tacked my comment onto the end of that.
Would this the Fiat G.46 under restoration?: Link.
“One puzzle, IMDb states “Christopher Nolan and Warner Bros reputedly bought a vintage WWII Lufttwaffe bomber for use in this movie, at a cost of $5 million.” Can anyone explain this please? Or was it erroneous?”
You can safely say that story came from the same pile of steaming manure as the one about Nolan buying a genuine Spitfire just to crash it for the movie.
Forgot to add. The designs are horrid.
If you want to preserve something for future generations why ruin it in the process?
If you copy a link from a secondary website like this forum it is likely to be copied in its abreviated form including that nasty little string of punctuation marks which is breaking the link.
You’re best copying the URL from the source website itself.
BEA coach is from Brooklands.
http://www.londonbusmuseum.com/museum-exhibits/single-decker-buses/1953-aec-regal-iv-bea-coach-4rf4-mll740/
Now I’m confused. I thought 2 were discovered much more recently -late 90’s/early 2000’s- In India in an elephant house.
And I thought the above plane plus IWM’s static are these airframes.
Other choppers are there apart from XH-51 between the main collection of aircraft and the Cessnas (other GA types are available) to the left.
Closest is a Hughes TH-55 I think. The other two, not so sure at all. The middle one is very sleek, could almost be the other XH-51A? It doesn’t look at all like a Huey. The last (left of the C-141) is very small and flimsy. I keep thinking Hiller for some reason.
Would that be a Sikorsky S-61/H-53 in front of the 707?