dark light

Supermarine305

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 337 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pressurized cockpits in WWII fighters #838283
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Its a curse, I tell ye!

    in reply to: Amazing Airshow (for a giggle) #838286
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    The perspective and scaling is all over the place.

    Those spits on the airfield are huge.

    Hoever I am pleased that Columbo’s dog is center stage. Its where he would have wanted to be.

    in reply to: Pressurized cockpits in WWII fighters #838766
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I thought is was the Spitfire marks VI, VII, X and XIX which were pressurised.

    You’re right.

    Mk VI was the first to be pressurised to get into service. The canopy was locked into place -wasn’t on rails.

    Really should leave this to Mk12.

    in reply to: Pressurized cockpits in WWII fighters #838768
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I know. I got sidetracked…

    in reply to: Pressurized cockpits in WWII fighters #838846
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Operational:

    Focke Wulf Ta 152H
    Junkers Ju 86P
    DH Mosquito NF. Mk. XV and PR. Mk 32.
    Spit’ Mk.IV. Mk.VI. HF Mk. VII. HF Mk. VIII

    Those were generally just pressurised versions of existing designs.

    The list of pressurised aircraft in WWII is huge. Its just that most of it is test aircraft and prototypes: Focke Wulf FW 190C series, Blohm & Voss 155B, Henschel Hs 130, Kawasaki Ki 108, Tachikawa Ki 74, Vickers Type 432. And that’s the stuff that got flown.

    Here’s a question: Is the B29 the only type to be designed with pressurisation from the outset to see widespread service in WWII?

    in reply to: Ridley Scott To Helm New "Battle Of Britain" Film?? #840506
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Do17s, Ju88s, Bf110 and Ju87s would be pretty hard to do without CGI. Scale models could be used but it wouldn’t be enough.

    Eagerly awaiting Dunkirk. (Still hoping that they’ll Emil up those buchons). Looks to be good either way.

    in reply to: Ridley Scott To Helm New "Battle Of Britain" Film?? #774122
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Why? The original Dam Busters and Battle of Britain are both pretty hammy; full of plumb voices, sprawling narrative (looking at you BoB) and are both very dated. Who watches those movies now? What is the viewership age demographic outside of classic movie aficianados and war move buffs?

    There is noting wrong in retelling a good story, even better when it is based on historic fact. Its just the how its done that is the issue rather than whether it should be. And there will be CGI. Live with it.

    in reply to: Facebook Restoration Threads #776050
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    A lovely list.

    Would it be worth pinning to the top of the Historic Aviation page?

    in reply to: Friday fun – recognition test #776704
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I’m impressed by your memory. πŸ™‚

    I can’t accurately recall what I had for breakfast

    Moggy

    I got all the answers right. I’ve got bragging rights. A crowning achievement if you will.

    Its not likely I’ll forget that in a hurry πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Friday fun – recognition test #777071
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    This was covered a little while back: http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?141560-What-is-it-(x49)

    Didn’t do any worse than last time but it was still a process of elimination rather than knowing what every type was. The drawback of multiple choice questions.

    P.S. Avia B.534 pictured was an underscale flyable replica. I wasn’t aware that one existed.

    in reply to: A W Albemarle ? #780074
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I’m pretty sure there is the cockpit frame somewhere. I saw a picture online but its since disappeared.

    There is a quarry somwhere where Albermarle bits were dumped, but contamination means recovery is unlikely.

    I am sure there is more out there and it would be interesting to see how much Albermarle remains. I have always liked the look of this aircraft. Its a bit like a Beaufort on steroids.

    in reply to: Gloster Javelin Sightings #785006
    Supermarine305
    Participant
    in reply to: Aerospace Bristol merged with Bristol Freighter for UK #785470
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Great progress! I’m really looking forward to this coming back to the UK πŸ™‚
    Apologies if this has been asked already, but does the Freighter still have tail feathers and engines in store somewhere? Or will the restorers in Bristol have to source them from somewhere?

    Hopefully they have access to the mortal remains of C-FDFC at Enstone. Wing and engines on site still (?). Is the tail still there?
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?89732-Bristol-Freighter-remains-at-Enstone-(old-thread)

    in reply to: Twatt dowsing and wing recovery #785687
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Interesting article. Makes you wonder what a novel approach might bring up in other airfields. However the final sentence did stand out a little.

    The information we have now is it’s a wing off of a clipped wing Spitfire which was used for high altitude reconnaissance.

    I thought clipped winged spits were for low level flight? That it aided in rolling and general maneouverability. If you wanted to go high up the last thing you’d do is clip the wings. You might even want to add some wing extensions such as found on Mk VI and Mk. VII Spits and others. Is this a wrong assumption?

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Have to agree with J Boyle here. We should be preserving more than just home built aircraft.

    And I am finding the lack of appreciation for the less famous, less glasmorous and less successful aircraft on a forum visted by aviation enthusiasts about the preservation of hitoric aviation slightly concerning (of course my sarcasm detector might be on the blink).

    The Bristol Feighter was a British post-war success story.It does has as much right to be preserved at Filton as Concord and I do hope that soon one will be.

    The Short Belfast did see service in the RAF. And if it is not the largest British designed and built aeroplane then it must come very close and is certainly to largest to be preserved..

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 337 total)