The camouflaged one.
Originally posted by Interflug62M
The aircraft was originally designed to carry the giant Soviet SS20 missile in one piece so had a very specific task to perform. All were built for the Soviet Air Force and operated by their crews, some were painted in Aeroflot colours to ease operations around the globe. As far as I know Aeroflot never owned any of them in the true sense, prior to the end of the Soviet Union.
Allow one of the drunkards from the ever peaceful and highly docile Modern Military board to nitpick…
The main reason for the An-22s development was indeed to haul strategic nuclear missiles from their factories to remote launch pads deep inside Russia. These were not SS-20s as this were relatively small missiles on a mobile launcher, but those huge silo-launched ones. The An-22 would have flown the missiles to the closest airbase, after which massive Mi-12 helicopters would fly the missile to their launch sites. Unfortunately the Mi-12 never made it beyond two prototypes (both survive, one at the Monino museum and one at the Mil plant at Moscow-Panki) so this never got anywhere.
Luckily, the An-22 did enter service as a heavy, long-range transport with the V-TA, the transport branch of the Soviet air force. They operated from three bases: Seshcha (now home to the An-124, very impressive to see some fifteen of them in dispersals), Ivanovo (the training base, now also the home of the A-50 Mainstays or the Il-76-with-radar-saucer) and Tver-Migalovo, formerly known as Kalinin-Migalovo. At the latter base, you can still find the one and only camouflaged An-22 which is looking awfully great. Some other An-22s did fly around with tactical codes (or bort numbers as us military folks like to call ’em), but mostly they wore their SSSR- and later RA- registrations.
Here is one of the coded An-22s, one of the early production machines without the radar-lip above the navigator’s station.
I’ve edited my signature too – now i’ll blend in just fine!
I’ve edited my signature too – now i’ll blend in just fine!
Yeah, count me in for the Bus Board Barbecue! It should be fun, and if it doesn’t work i can always try to convert some of the Old Guard airliner-ballast-people over to the Dark Side.
I can bring a few pints of beer for myself, can’t I? At least that’s the size real men’s airlines like Kenya Airways hand out.
Yeah, count me in for the Bus Board Barbecue! It should be fun, and if it doesn’t work i can always try to convert some of the Old Guard airliner-ballast-people over to the Dark Side.
I can bring a few pints of beer for myself, can’t I? At least that’s the size real men’s airlines like Kenya Airways hand out.
You can even go back earlier. Most of the stuff written by Yefim Gordon now published in English was also previously published in Russian magazines (Aviatsia i Vremya, the two articles on the Tu-95/Tu-142 being almost word by word translated into the Aerofax book for example), and also in a few Polish booklets (a five year older version of the Aerofax Tu-22/Tu-22M book only cost me one tenth of the price of the Aerofax book, which helped reading a lot but didn’t have anything new).
A question for the people with a large library: for some reason i have never seen Gordon’s writings on the Tu-16 – neither in the Directory, nor in IAPR nor even in any Russian publication. If someone has, and also is in posession of Butowski’s (yes, PiBu 😉 ) excellent “Lotnictwo Wojskowe Rosji tom 2”, could you make a comparison? While being only a few pages, this Polish book is still my most used reference on the Badger.
Piotr, if you’re reading this: a great thank you for especially those two books. Very informative, and they did help as evidence i was an enthusiast rather than a spy at a certain incident too 😀
F-16s are effective, but a very short-time solution. I’m not an F-16 enemy, i’m only demonstrating how the F-16 has a serious self-esteem problem which sometimes gets the airframe to get all suicidal. Of course, i won’t be the shrink trying to talk those little plastic suckbellies out of their psychological misery 🙂
Originally posted by PRC4eva
I tink there it is Chinese..the obvius fact is that the flight crew uniform is JUST like the one China uses, and they do look Chinese, not European..do you see any yellow or brown hair there?
This aircraft appear to be using at Blue Flag, which is an aggressor unit..
and finaly the trees there is much like what you can find in China.. Bulgaria does not look like that
they have alot of trees and steep mountains.
I hope you will claim this following picture is a photoshop. I always like it when people insist in stupidity.
Geilenkirchen, Geforce. Not Gelsenkirchen. Geilenkirchen is a former RAF base on the German-Dutch border roughly 20km north of Aachen, Gelsenkirchen is a city in the Ruhrgebiet.
Re: Comets and Nimrods
Originally posted by Dave Homewood
…At the end it shows one of Dan Air’s Comets being broken up.
Saw one of those at the Hermeskeil museum last wednesday, in a reasonable state considering it’s parked outside and obligatory lack of funds for such a large private collection. It’s a Comet 4C, G-BDIW, c/n 6470. I made a few pics at the place, i will post them as soon as they are processed (don’t expect too much though).
None of those even come close to the style of this one…
I think you should pay a little more attention at school, Erez…
But it’s a good thing i threw my old school notebooks out 🙂
🙂
Can’t help but admire the modelers which go at any length to make their models as accurate as possible.
Because it’s so….. easy? It even seems f-16.net censores it’s pictures of intact Vipers 😉