dark light

bob909

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 186 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Israel offered to sell South Africa nukes #1887299
    bob909
    Participant

    This is not new information to anyone who has studied military issues in South Africa or Israel. But, now we have clear substantiation.

    So many Israel supporters have tried to deny Israel’s role in helping S Africa acquire nukes, and in assembling French-Israeli aircraft and equipment.

    And it’s also great to have clear proof that Israel has nukes.

    What proof? There was no proof, now several newspaper articles assembled to the book and its become a proof?

    “Apartheid” is a new trend in arabs accusation of Israel. This word sounds ecpecially funny from arab Parlament Members or from one of the tens of southands arab students from Israel universities, while Israelis not allowed not only live in Palestinian authority, but even to enter it. Now arabs want to find as many connections between words “apartheid” and “Israel”, thats all the blurb about this “book”.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401844
    bob909
    Participant

    What a morning!
    – if I said that Russians would be better off designing an 80% Raptor at 50% cost, well, looks like they got the first part right, this is definitely something that could seriously endanger F-35s one day.

    Actually just frame is ready and Zvezda TV claimed the price of $90m. So now it 80% cost for 20% Raptor.

    in reply to: Soviet missiles on western aircraft (and vice versa!) #1806774
    bob909
    Participant

    This is the well known egyptian Mig-21MF with AIM-9Ps and an ECM pod almost certainly italian made ( Elettronica ELT-555?)

    Does anyone know more about this upgrade ? When did it really took place ? What avionics upgrades did it involved ? New HUD, radar , RWR ? I’ve seen enough egyptian Mig-21 pics taken relatevly recently , and there is not a single recognizable upgrade element…not on the outside at least …

    Any infos would be greatly apreciated, thanks.

    http://www.vectorsite.net/avmig21_3.html

    After 1973 … Egyptians initiated a relatively modest “Westernization” update of their MiG-21 fleet, performed by British Aerospace and Rolls-Royce. The update was mostly an avionics fix, involving fit of a GEC-Marconi HUD, Teledyne navigation and IFF units, and Tracor AN/ALE-40 chaff-flare dispensers. Egyptian MiG-21s also learned to carry Western weapons, such as Sidewinder AAMs.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1812421
    bob909
    Participant

    Russia’s air-defence network has collapsed on a 10% level seens 91, they still have 8500-10,000 S-300PMU-2/V/VM/S-400 Missiles aimed at the sky.

    Wow, really impressive! What source do you use for 8500 S-300’s?

    in reply to: THOR missile films/docs #1814403
    bob909
    Participant
    bob909
    Participant

    F-35 production and testing
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KW9rDTZKVg
    Sorry if repost

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2436198
    bob909
    Participant

    7th and 8th Mi-28N for RuAF
    http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/1627/41198742.jpg
    http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/4549/31377208.jpg
    http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/476/90833661.jpg
    http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/1678/99257336.th.jpghttp://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5333/31976377.th.jpg

    in reply to: Cheap air forces: surplus military aircraft #2439048
    bob909
    Participant

    Well, column 5 is a condition category. None of them is ready to flight. Not mention that fuselage is so aged, that even with new engines no country will allow this thing to fly over.

    in reply to: Su-35-4 crashes on takeoff-Pilot OK #2462447
    bob909
    Participant

    I think the damage to bort 03 is quite reparable

    http://photofile.name/users/sergxon/96063153/107599303/
    http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/9838/107599306.jpg
    http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/7283/107599309.jpg

    in reply to: Mi-28N vs Ka-52 #2498606
    bob909
    Participant

    3rd Ka-52 from HeliExpo’09
    http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9408/attachmentlcq.jpg
    more pics

    bob909
    Participant

    It is called a documentary, what is hardly justified by such an uninformed TV style level.
    Nearly all footages are “look-a-likes” and taken from other events to give that story some pictures. What a pity, that I does not speak Russian. The meat may be the personal reports, when it is interesting to learn, what questions were answered in what style in 2005 or around 30 years later.

    Thanks God you dont speak Russian. What a poor show – bathos built on the rumors.

    bob909
    Participant

    So they were Egyptian or “went home”? 😉
    There are a lot of sources about soviet pilots of Mig-25’s in Egypt (63rd separate aviagroup):
    http://www.testpilot.ru/russia/mikoyan/mig/25/r/63.htm
    http://www.hubara-rus.ru/avia.html
    In Russian at least, sorry

    in reply to: This is surprising. 70% of RuAF MiG-29s unable to fly #2454684
    bob909
    Participant

    Have to say that I agree with Flex wholeheartedly here. If any of you think that the relationship between any government and its domestic military industry (or military industrial complex if you will) is pure and uncorrupted you are nothing short of naive.

    Its not about the relationship between the government and its domestic military industry. Its more how they manage the money intended for army developing. Buying new Porsche Cayenne every 2-3 years and new home electronics while often there is not enough food for conscripts.

    in reply to: Su-34 with regiment emblem #2454691
    bob909
    Participant

    Is it really on of the new Su-34(03) from the second production batch?

    It is. She arrived to Lipetsk on 20.01.09
    http://gorod48.ru/association/news-12175.html (Russian)

    http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/8851/dsc01272mj9.jpg
    via strizhi.info

    in reply to: This is surprising. 70% of RuAF MiG-29s unable to fly #2457047
    bob909
    Participant

    Neither the Tu-334 nor the 1.42 were economically viable or competitive. From an enthusiast’s point of view it is a pity that they had to go, but ultimately it will be for the greater good of the Russian aviation industry as a whole. Even now there just isn’t enough money to support large numbers of projects, as flex has stated already.

    And underachievement compared to earlier (schedule) promises is becoming something of an industry standard 😉 Look at the 787, the A400M, the ARJ21, the LCA, the C-X and yes, also the SSJ. It’s by no means unique to Pogosyan or Russia 😀

    Russia here is in very different situation. There is only one buyer for 90% of it’s aviation industry – the government. If 90% of the budget money goes to one company and two others gets the rest neither their project will be “economically viable or competitive”.
    Its also answer for “one healthy corporation” of Flex (and Russian government). There is nothing healthy in fully corrupted Russian government, industry and military.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 186 total)