It was a fantastic moment hearing that ‘thunk!’ as the battery relays operated! We’ll get power where we need it next time, as since Sunday I’ve had my head in the AP, and I’m pretty sure the fuses mentioned in my last post are the culprit. Its all a matter of getting more familiar with the Meteor; we’re all learning its ways and its starting to pay off.
Sun 29 May
An interesting day working on the jet!
First up was the usual opening up and removing covers, allowing myself, Andy and Graham (Blue_2) to get stuck in. Graham had removed the main instrument panel for cleaning, and its come back looking a treat. Not over restored either, which makes it look like its never been removed from WS788; a difficult thing to do. Its one of those things you hope to be able to achieve in order for it to fit in with the rest of the aircraft – you want her to wear the years proudly but not look derelict.
We did notice there’s some cut wires behind the panel, but there’s enough spare in the looms to be able to re attach them a task for another day – something Graham insists is my task as I seem to be able to make the ‘electric string’ do what I want for the most part.. Thankfully a couple of plugs and connecting cables are intact and can just be switched out, but there’s going to be a few little soldrring jobs to keep me busy.
One of those jobs is reconnecting the wires properly to the taxi lamps behind the nose gear door. The cable, like many others had been cut and was damaged, so working with a multimeter the damaged section was cut out and the remaining portion checked and found serviceable, losing about 2″ off the original cable length. It could be a problem during retraction of the undercarriage, but thats not happening any time soon so we can live with it until the bigger list of jobs gets sorted.
Next up was fitting a freshly charged battery into the bay on the aircraft – the idea being that we may be able to restore some limited electrical services on the old Meteor, such as the taxi lamps we’d just refitted. An analogy as to how the wiring has been cut on the aircraft is to consider WS788 as paralysed from the neck down. We have a front loom intact, a back loom intact and some really bad damage in the middle. We hoped to be able to find where the spark (hopefully not literally…) of life is hiding in the front section.
The battery went in, but a measly 13.5 volts wasn’t enough to get any signs of anything waking up. So, off we toddled into the hangar to borrow a Trolley Acc, we also found another willing victim volunteer in Sam Ward from the Victor team to help. In went the Trolley Acc plug, and armed with a suitable fire extinguisher and with a watchful eye for smoke, the switch flicked to on.
Two loud thumps from the port side as the battery relays engaged, for the first time in nearly 50 years. But, try as we might we couldn’t persuade anything to give more life than that. Power was reaching the bus bar, but not beyond it, so the next step is to trace the wires and find out if the high amp fuses are intact that feed junction boxes. JB2, 3 5 and the generator control panel. Then we’ll have another crack at waking WS788 from sleeping so long.
Stay tuned for more, we will revive this old night fighter one way or another.
Regards,
Rich
If we can get new sections made, it may be worth our while getting a batch done then.
57 is a Halifax part number isn’t it? 57 xxx C1 would make it a fuselage part…
Where’s Cees when you need him?!
The CAA have never outright said no to a flying Shackleton (though BAE tried hard to make it so.) When they entered preservation neither WR963 or WL790 had any fatigue data or servicing records to confirm or deny the claims made that the entire fleet was life expired… so a spar change was the only way forward.
Since then – with a lot of help and luck – the historical logs for 963 have been found and acquired. They show that the 594 hours we believed she had left is accurate.
This seems to have been accepted, and I got a rather pleasant response from the CAA and the Shackleton got added to the list of types eligible for a permit to fly.
The upcoming NDT may show up issues caused by how long 963 has been sat outside, and render the remaining spar life unusable – so its by no means a done deal.
Regards
Rich
Hi Air Ministry,
Any chance of a photo? I can ask the Coventry Shack team if its something they need. I know a few years back we were desperate for certain bearings.
Kind regards
Rich
Some great photos there , don’t you guys have any soft jaws? When you said you were taking it just shy of airworthy surely you should be doing all you can to ensure your not mashing up what’s left of 788 I had to cringe when I saw unprotected vice teeth gripping the pin. If you do that on bracketry it will ultimately end in crack propagation. Just trying to help. Out of interest, how are you going to do the continuity and high voltage checks to prove the radio installation? Would be interested to know what kit you guys use. Great project. Might have to pop up for a brew sometime
Yes, we have soft jaws, but they wouldn’t have straightened out a badly pitted, corroded and mutilated pin satisfactorily. A pin, I might add, thats only getting used until a suitable replacement is found, as its needed to keep certain parts in place! We’re not intent on mashing up whats left of 788 (a bit of an unfair comment..) but fixings and various bolts and fasteners are going to get slung if they’re not up to scratch as will happen on any restoration.
The radios – we have some TR1985 units on the way to fill a couple of the shelves, but we’ll be calling on the expertise of a few radio/electrical specialists we know to make sure the smoke stays in the wires. We can do some checks with a multimeter, but not all of them as you correctly guess!
Regards,
Rich
Judging by how well its held together this long, I’d say better than most things dragged out of the Channel.
Frame 11 is important of course, but it is not the only section being looked at while we ponder how to deal with the lack of tail wheel and strut. (did someone say they had access to a Mk1 Devon/Heron Nose wheel??- the tyre is different but the actual wheel hub casting should be the same).
Here’s the link to a Barracuda tailwheel and tyre listed on eBay currently.
Hook it up to a single LED, and really annoy the environmentalists.
Shackleton WR963 has various scribblings from Bitteswell in the port undercarriage bay, and some hastily pencilled wiring digrams inside the front bomb bay where the radar went. On the tailplane front spar where it passes through there’s also “Fly Taildraggers – we do!”.
This has got to be the first time members have been unable to identify a set of wheels with a AHO number.
Must be rare !!!
(lol)
I think that AHO number is on the bearing locking ring, not the wheel, which might cause a problem. If you gently clean the face off the wheel you may find more numbers.
When I was at college and looking for my first car I had a bit of money laid away. I got offered a S1 E-type Coupe that had been in a slight accident (crumpled nose and tail – but repairable) but passed it up for an XJ6 that was on the road. I wish I had bought the E-type!
When I was at college and looking for my first car I had a bit of money laid away. I got offered a S1 E-type Coupe that had been in a slight accident (crumpled nose and tail – but repairable) but passed it up for an XJ6 that was on the road. I wish I had bought the E-type!
They’re not Shackleton – they don’t have the pedals on a bar. Are there any numbers visible?