Still in storage as of last week. Looks much like it does in your picture but without the tarpaulin.
Regards,
Rich
If you want Griffons there are easier ones to get to than the ones on WR963!
No, reading through some of their board they’ve been following our progress for a while. We’ve had a few Dutch visitors this year (amongst other nationalities), I’m wondering if it was any of them?
Rich
Just a quick hello to the guys on the Nederlandse Tractor Pulling Forum. Thanks for being interested in how we’re getting on, and its inspiring to know that we’re being watched from further afield than just the UK!
Kind regards,
Rich
The hubs look rather like Mosquito items.
Just watching the documentary on the link you posted, (thanks btw) and I was wondering if, not being a Shackleton expert or anything, but “Number 57” referred to as being involved with the rescue of the passengers on liner that caught fire, is that one of those left to rot in Cyprus?
“Number 57” refers to the tail number carried by WL757 while on 8 Sqn. WL757 was the aircraft involved in the rescue efforts for the burning cruise liner Lakonia.
WL757 and WL747 are still sat in Cyprus… I have hopes that one day at least one of the pair will be preserved.
Regards,
Rich
Hi all,
You’ll notice that there hasn’t been an update for a couple of weeks…. its not that we have been ignoring things, more that there’s no real visual progress at the minute. We’ve had a couple of weeks of irritating fault finding.
We’ve had a problem with the No 4 engine’s propeller refusing to respond to its controls which has been a real pain in the rear (why it couldn’t wait just a few weeks longer.. 😡 ) with the control linkages, CSU, and propeller itself all coming under suspiscion at various times. We are starting to see a little progress on this, and its hoped by the 22nd Sept when WR963 is scheduled to run for the Shackleton Association it will be behaving again.
We still of course have the fornt prop to mount on No 2. This is waiting on a couple of bits of engineering work being done off site. Predictably this engine had to be the one missing a few bits; and though they were kindly found and donated by forum member Anon, we’ve had to get a tool made to refit them.
The taxy run… well we were aiming to try to taxy before the end of September. We’ve persuaded WR963 quite a way on, what with the tailwheel replacement amongst other things, but the clock is ticking.
If we overshoot September a little, we’ll find a way to invite you all to see WR963 taxy as soon as she’s ready. We aren’t about to quit yet though – we’re going to keep at it to see if we can make it happen some time inside the next three weeks.
Regards,
Rich
Griffon and prop from a Shackleton. Good luck to them in the races!
As I have got all the Avro drawings to paint the Lanc with all the colour codes on them for the Dark Green ,Dark Earth and Night maybe you could shed some light on where I am going wrong.
Ignore the paint police. Who can say whats right apart from the drawings? Of the few colour pictures I’ve seen it seems the wartime dark green lightens off as it fades pretty quickly anyway. The dark earth doesn’t seem to go as badly.
It would be nice to see it painted up as Easy Elsie (NF920)!
🙁
Can I vote not? It would remind me of my failure caused by blinkered idiots every time I looked at it.
I wonder whether they could be persuaded to do a Coastal scheme in washable paint? That way we get the best of both. Of course, if it doesn’t come off some of us won’t be too unhappy…
In a Bomber Command scheme I’d love to see PA474 dressed as “Ropey” complete with sharks mouths! :diablo:
What a stupid place to relocate to , its a 600 mile round trip from here so i and many other people i know won,t be going to see this new location ,the cost of the fuel alone would be out of the question
At the moment its 200 mile round trip for me every weekend to Airbase. To get to Newquay is a 600 mile (ish) round trip from here. I’ve done it for the weekend in the past, and will probably do it again.
We live on an island, and most of its easy to get to. We’re not talking crossing the Sahara type distances here.
Quite possibly; but until we know where we’re going to be on the airport once everything calms down, there’s not much point in trying to set something up.
Midland Air Museum is a great place with great people, but its not where our Shackleton is going to be living, we’re quite happy out on the airport.
I know some people see it as a bit daft; but its not when you look at it from our point of view – as long as they’re happy to have us it allows us the freedom to keep running the aircraft (and taxy it before long.)
As David mentions, long term for the Shackleton we need to look at her being under cover, but until the redevelopment plans settle a bit we don’t really know even what current buildings are going to be left standing.
I might have missed something here, but if Coventry airport stays open for the operation and maintenance of aircraft, then why move the rest of the known and established collection away from there?
Most likely due to lack of space and the upcoming redevelopment. Even now there’s just not enough space.
At the moment several aircraft have to live outdoors, that should really be indoors. Canberra WK163 for instance. Any large maintenance done in the end of the Airbase hangar usually sees one or two more aircraft outside for a while.
Pretty much everything that is part of the Classic Airforce. As we understand it – other than our WR963, the Nimrod and the DC6 diner are staying. Maintenance is staying on site at Coventry so whatever normally flies and is a bit poorly, or they have under rebuild probably won’t go.
The problem for enthusiasts is not going to be what stays behind, but more one of access. What does stay at Coventry is unlikely to be open to the public in the same way as it is at the moment.
Regards,
Rich
Cracking video… I think its the Shackleton 40th anniversary at Woodford, I’ve seen video taken from the other side which shows the crosswind a bit better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av0E-RH31NQ
15:00 in is where the landings start, and it gives you a respect for the aircrew.
Seajet – Definitely of interest as that is our WR963! Can you give me a date that the photo was taken?
Regards,
Rich