dark light

richw_82

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,736 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 30 years since Penlee #1864639
    richw_82
    Participant

    Just read the link in your first post. I’m speechless… those guys were heroes, without a shadow of a doubt.

    richw_82
    Participant

    These were applied just under the windscreen quarter panel in white lettering
    WL747 & ‘757 that went to Paphos also had titling applied, but in the pictures I have they’re unreadable.

    I’m spending far too much time on this!:)

    Regarding Paphos –

    WL747 carries a name on the starboard side, but none of the photo’s I have are close enough to be able to read it.

    WL757 carries “Wg Cdr C J Booth” on the port side.

    No idea if WR967 is carrying anything, from the last photo I saw earlier this year it was barely visible in the weeds.

    If I manage to get any co-operation out the airport personnel over in Paphos I might be able to get a bit more info. Its about time I sent them an e-mail/letter again anyway.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Watched 633 Squadron last night.. #1052944
    richw_82
    Participant

    Thanks! I always assumed it was RR299, as it wore “633 Squadron” codes for quite a while.

    in reply to: Watched 633 Squadron last night.. #1053240
    richw_82
    Participant

    Mosquito T3 RR299 was not in fact used in “633 Squadron” as it was undergoing an overhaul at the time. However it was used in “Mosquito Squadron.”

    So which one is the genuine solid nose aircraft in the film then? :confused:

    in reply to: Spitfire PS853 #1054204
    richw_82
    Participant

    I’m glad she’s getting rebuilt, and I hope Rolls Royce keep her.

    I was fortunate enough to be allowed to have a look around her a few times when she was in Derbyshire and is a lovely old machine.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1055197
    richw_82
    Participant

    Some pictures of the last couple of days work.

    The bomb bay carrier points have access panels inside the aircraft. Its a distinctive alloy cover, and they are in rows of three. Some are easier to spot and get to than others.

    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/IMAG0200.jpg
    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/IMAG0199.jpg

    We took them up one by one and refurbished them. Each cover plate has seven moving parts, which seems a bit overkill, but probably why they still work after 20 years of inactivity. I’ll get a shot of the mechanism inside in the new year (I needed more light.) but it consists of a sprung latch, a lock, and an attachment to fit a jacking mechanism into for lifting carriers, stores, or payload into place.

    The carriers themselves – now fitted to 963 – look something like this:

    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/IMAG0192.jpg
    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/IMAG0185.jpg

    They lock off onto the carrier point mechanically, and have their own electrically operated latch. This is how things are dropped out, the carrier itself stays with the aircraft. As we may have something fitted to them next year we’ve got one of the old “Aircraft Armed” signs and put it over the selectors inside. We don’t want any accidents – these things are heavy, as I found out earlier today when I didn’t lock one off and put the buffers down onto it properly.

    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/IMAG0198.jpg

    The middle points have been used to hang the pannier. Its a genuine Shackleton item, we have another one just like it in storage. We’ve removed the canvas outer cover for the time being, as we’re using it for a different purpose and don’t want it to rot. The panniers are an ingenious piece of kit, you can configure them to be shallow or deep to fit any point in the bomb bay without fouling the doors.

    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/IMAG0186.jpg

    The covers in there are spare ones, and the little mechanical ‘bit’ nestled in there is my homework for the new year – one of the aircraft’s pneumatic compressors.

    So that is it for 2011… what a year.

    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/IMAG0196.jpg

    The covers are on, the door is locked and Avro Shackleton WR963 is now having a well deserved nap until the new year. She’ll growl plenty more in 2012, helping keep the legend that is the Shackleton alive, and if everything goes to plan we may even see her go for a wander around under her own power.

    Thanks to all that have donated parts or funding to help her, cheered us on in the face of the problems she’s thrown at us, and of course the many of you that have been to visit our old bomber. Its been appreciated by all our little team.

    See you all in January.

    Kind Regards,

    Rich and the SPT

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1056287
    richw_82
    Participant

    17 Dec

    Short work day today, mainly because I’m back at Coventry tomorrow. However we did get the pannier collected and fitted into stations 4 – 6 in the bomb bay. It speaks volumes for the build of the Shackleton that with a little persuasion with WD40, the carrier points behaved as if they had last been used yesterday. The pannier engaged with a rather satisfactory ‘clunk’ then with the latches locked in the bomb bay floor it was solid as a rock…. so suitable for our purpose – which is to put the weather covers in.

    Success always makes you that bit more eager – and with December being about deliveries – we decided to add the bomb carriers I mentioned a while back. These are the first of some presents that were arranged for WR963 at the night run. Again, they fitted perfectly with no extreme effort required. We’ll see if they still operate when our electrician is back after Christmas.

    It’s nice to be getting to the point where we can concentrate on giving long redundant parts of the aircraft some life, rather than major parts. There are a couple of other systems that require attention that will be getting worked on before long. There’s no reason why we can’t wake up some of the navigation systems and the galley.

    I was also pleasantly surprised to see a couple of boxes of familiar propeller parts, and six blades in the hangar today. I’m told the rest will follow shortly.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1060925
    richw_82
    Participant

    I don’t know if it will show up, but if I don’t look I won’t know! It gives me an excuse to root through all the old documents anyway (like I needed one 😀 )

    WR963’s name can just be made out in this pic, below and slightly in front of the cockpit side window.

    http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo34/richw_82/DSCF1097-1.jpg

    When we were doing the paint I checked for evidence of a name on the other side, nothing to be found. No sign of a cartoon either.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1061089
    richw_82
    Participant

    I’ll have to have a poke around in our library/archive and see if I can find anything. There’s stuff in there from the last 12 or so aircraft, including a couple of bits of paperwork for WL795.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1061114
    richw_82
    Participant

    I’ve wondered whether some of the names were noted down wrong, when the list was compiled.

    WR963 carried the name “Ermintrude” on the nose, and still does on the engineers panel – where it is written in marker “Ermintrude 63”. The name on the nose was visible until September last year, and probably survives under the white.

    in reply to: Hearing CFS at Coventry have bounced back #1062161
    richw_82
    Participant

    Sorry to hear that my friend.

    Thank you – and your colleagues – for the help we’ve had from you in the past with the Shackleton. I hope everything works out for you all, though the situation as I hear it seems pretty bleak.

    Kind regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1062346
    richw_82
    Participant

    We can’t all have scantily clad lady painted on the nose y’know.

    That kind of behaviour is fine for those weird hemp coloured Dyson things that dispense jet fuel, but a Shackleton such as WR963 has a little more class…
    :rolleyes:

    …as anybody that can find the 1993 Pilots Pals calendar will see, the proper positioning for the young lady is posing in front of the aircraft.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1062987
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi Rich I just wanted to thank everyone for last nights engine running your lady did you proud. I thought you may like a few pics of the evening.

    Ian,

    Thanks for the compliments, and the photo’s. They’re smashinG!

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1063014
    richw_82
    Participant

    The Boulton Paul Association pointed us toward some possible sources of turret parts, which was of immense help, and cut down on the work required there.

    When I was told we have a dustbin on the way I was stunned! I never thought we’d get one. I’ve now been eyeing up where I can do a little bit of jacking of the aircraft, as I don’t think AIRBASE would be too happy if I dug a scanner servicing pit… :diablo:

    The prop… much as its a pain, I refuse to complain about it due to the recent hardships faced by CFS employees.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1063030
    richw_82
    Participant

    10 Dec

    A very cold Coventry greeted us… patches of ice everywhere which caused some concern, but all had a determination to see the day go well. In between de-icing WR963, we helped the GST erect barriers and get the other Night Run participants more or less where they needed to be. A big well done to all involved in organising the event, and carrying it out.

    We had arranged to do a short run on WR963 around midday, as that would let us get the pre-oiling out of the way and rectify any small snags that might show. The outside air temperature was showing barely 4 degrees, so we had to pre oil for four minutes on each engine… several of our crew are now happy that they no longer require a diet before Christmas. :diablo:

    Happily the midday run only showed a couple of lights that were out, and a problem with the external intercom. The radiator temperatures took forever to come up, as the pneumatics for their shutters are supplied from the compressor on No 2 engine.. :rolleyes:

    We got the intercom sorted, and the bomb bay lights, then got ready for the run at the end of the night. Watching the other aircraft do their bit under moonlight was magical, the Meteor T7 in particular impressing me.

    At 6.30pm, the lights were on us, and we started No 3 engine at precisely 6.40pm, right on schedule.Most of the run went without a hitch, apart from the last couple of minutes when No 1 engine cut out at low revs. We expected a bit too much from it at low temperatures, and it showed its discontent when we attempted to restart it, producing a good sized exhaust fire from the excess fuel. We kept it turning to blow the fire out, but decided it was best to shut down rather than provoke it further.

    The photo’s and video I’ve seen of the whole event look to show it was a good one, and we enjoyed it. Even better was letting members of the public see a Shackleton lit up inside, and taking on board two veterans from 120 Sqn Coastal Command for the run ups.

    Back to normal next week..

    We’re going to try and get the pannier on, and get all the covers fitted to keep 963 dry and well over the Christmas/New Year break.

    Regarding the armaments… we’re collecting bits from here, there, and everywhere. We’ve been talking to several organisations, and have found some bits, others are being more elusive. The intent is to fit the aircraft with nose cannon, and a mid-upper turret.

    I’ve also been told that we have a scanner dustbin on the way, to help put 963 one step closer to her old MR2 state. We’re going to have to have a little think in the new year about how far we go – we set out to represent an MR2 with WR963, but with more and more parts coming to light we might be able to get her a lot closer than we originally thought.

    Kind regards,

    Rich

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,736 total)