You seem very quick to dismiss a body that won the Nobel Prize. I wonder why?
Are you serious??? They also Gave Al Gore a share of that gong for christs sake.
The WMO is in that gang, part of the UN. Funded and told what to do by the USA (Or do you believe the UN is independent!)
Jesus H Tapdancin Christ, do you think I would defend a position without a trusted source?
Science Daily (Mar. 30, 2005) “Ice Core ‘Dipstick’ Indicates West Antarctic Ice Has Thinned Less Than Believed”
ScienceDaily (Aug. 10, 2006) “Overall Antarctic Snowfall Hasn’t Changed In 50 Years”
How about a free book? “Unstoppable global Warming” by Fred Singer. Do a google, it’s a PDF.
A good article is “CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time” by Zbigniew Jaworowski. This has about 200 further references.
You could even refer to Ch4 “The global warming scandal”, which was ridiculed by the government……well, they would wouldn’t they.
On top of that, refer back to year 1 physics, the mass of the planet, the joules of energy hitting it every day, the energy within the core.
Compare that to the “Damage” that these nasty poluting nations have allegedly done. Compare that to the empty land mass and water mass of earth. We are nothing in this scheme. If you listen to the greens, we’d all be choking to death as we walk our very streets. I read somewhere that my tank of petrol deposits 300 kg of Co2 as it’s used. Petrol is 820kg per cubic metre. My figures are about 184g of Co2 per litre used, and that is on a very bad car like mine at 36mpg. That’s about 7kg, not 300. But I’m used to being bombarded by bullsh** from the greens and the government, so as soon as one opens their mouth it pays to go and check and do your own sums.
The debate in the scientific community is far hotter than you versus me, join a few of their forums for a spell.
In the past 30 years it’s gone from the Ice Age is coming to, oh erm sorry we meant global warming. Yeah, right we did all that damage in that short space of time.
You seem very quick to dismiss a body that won the Nobel Prize. I wonder why?
Are you serious??? They also Gave Al Gore a share of that gong for christs sake.
The WMO is in that gang, part of the UN. Funded and told what to do by the USA (Or do you believe the UN is independent!)
Jesus H Tapdancin Christ, do you think I would defend a position without a trusted source?
Science Daily (Mar. 30, 2005) “Ice Core ‘Dipstick’ Indicates West Antarctic Ice Has Thinned Less Than Believed”
ScienceDaily (Aug. 10, 2006) “Overall Antarctic Snowfall Hasn’t Changed In 50 Years”
How about a free book? “Unstoppable global Warming” by Fred Singer. Do a google, it’s a PDF.
A good article is “CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time” by Zbigniew Jaworowski. This has about 200 further references.
You could even refer to Ch4 “The global warming scandal”, which was ridiculed by the government……well, they would wouldn’t they.
On top of that, refer back to year 1 physics, the mass of the planet, the joules of energy hitting it every day, the energy within the core.
Compare that to the “Damage” that these nasty poluting nations have allegedly done. Compare that to the empty land mass and water mass of earth. We are nothing in this scheme. If you listen to the greens, we’d all be choking to death as we walk our very streets. I read somewhere that my tank of petrol deposits 300 kg of Co2 as it’s used. Petrol is 820kg per cubic metre. My figures are about 184g of Co2 per litre used, and that is on a very bad car like mine at 36mpg. That’s about 7kg, not 300. But I’m used to being bombarded by bullsh** from the greens and the government, so as soon as one opens their mouth it pays to go and check and do your own sums.
The debate in the scientific community is far hotter than you versus me, join a few of their forums for a spell.
In the past 30 years it’s gone from the Ice Age is coming to, oh erm sorry we meant global warming. Yeah, right we did all that damage in that short space of time.
So if the governments tomorrow told you that climate change wasn’t exacerbated by man, you’d change your views and believe it was?
No, I will not believe a government. I seek the truth, this cannot be found from a government.
It doesn’t cross your mind that you are in a minority of two and a bit because you might actually be wrong?
How very dare we speak out against the believers!
2 on this thread. Independent science on the other hand is agin you lot.But then anybody who doesn’t see it your way is an ‘idiot’ aren’t they?
No, only those who believe governments and religions and other brainwashing bodies, all of which have an ulterior motive.
Moggy
You need to trust the experts, not wan*ers that are put there for a 5 year stint, in which their only motive is to milk a BIG salary and pension therefrom.
So if the governments tomorrow told you that climate change wasn’t exacerbated by man, you’d change your views and believe it was?
No, I will not believe a government. I seek the truth, this cannot be found from a government.
It doesn’t cross your mind that you are in a minority of two and a bit because you might actually be wrong?
How very dare we speak out against the believers!
2 on this thread. Independent science on the other hand is agin you lot.But then anybody who doesn’t see it your way is an ‘idiot’ aren’t they?
No, only those who believe governments and religions and other brainwashing bodies, all of which have an ulterior motive.
Moggy
You need to trust the experts, not wan*ers that are put there for a 5 year stint, in which their only motive is to milk a BIG salary and pension therefrom.
Ignore me, ignore Government if you can’t judge when they’re spinning – but read what the independent scientists say, that’s why I posted links to credible reports for the comments I’ve made. Read all the scientists and judge on the consensus view.
You posted links to Intergovernment study groups.
OK, you agree with Climate Change. But how do you explain that for 800,000 years (the ice core record) the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere didn’t go above about 300ppm. But in the last 50 years it has and now is 375ppm.
Please study clathrates, and the compression of air pockets forming different chemical reactions..especially that of Co2. Once again, outfits like the IPCC have cherry picked the readings they require.
The IPCC states: “most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations”
IPCC. The case rests.
Ignore me, ignore Government if you can’t judge when they’re spinning – but read what the independent scientists say, that’s why I posted links to credible reports for the comments I’ve made. Read all the scientists and judge on the consensus view.
You posted links to Intergovernment study groups.
OK, you agree with Climate Change. But how do you explain that for 800,000 years (the ice core record) the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere didn’t go above about 300ppm. But in the last 50 years it has and now is 375ppm.
Please study clathrates, and the compression of air pockets forming different chemical reactions..especially that of Co2. Once again, outfits like the IPCC have cherry picked the readings they require.
The IPCC states: “most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations”
IPCC. The case rests.
Joglo, the brainwashing of the proletariat seems to have worked. On this forum, it’s you and me plus maybe one other that have resisted UTTER TRASH written by idiots wasting their education.
I say again, NOBODY is denying that global warming is real.
But to blame it on man is nothing more than foolhardy.
And to think man can change it or solve this problem is equally foolhardy.
I keep my carbon footprint as low as feasible.
I shall continue to recycle stuff, in the hope that it will bring prices down.
I shall continue to use one energy efficient bulb in my bedside reading light as it may keep the lecky bill down a bit…. (Until they invent an energy efficient one that actually gives off light and can be used in the house, whereupon I will change them all to save money).
I shall continue to save energy in general, to lower my bills, bills that have been forced up due to a weak scared public believing that there isn’t much left “So you have to pay more for it”.
I shall continue to water the garden with water from the water butt. Because it’s better for the plants AND it doesn’t cost me an outrageous amount (Over £4.00 a cubic metre for supply and waste).
I shall continue to drive old cars, one day…18 years time or so…. I may be forced to drive a hybrid or an electric one because I’ll have no choice.
Joglo, the brainwashing of the proletariat seems to have worked. On this forum, it’s you and me plus maybe one other that have resisted UTTER TRASH written by idiots wasting their education.
I say again, NOBODY is denying that global warming is real.
But to blame it on man is nothing more than foolhardy.
And to think man can change it or solve this problem is equally foolhardy.
I keep my carbon footprint as low as feasible.
I shall continue to recycle stuff, in the hope that it will bring prices down.
I shall continue to use one energy efficient bulb in my bedside reading light as it may keep the lecky bill down a bit…. (Until they invent an energy efficient one that actually gives off light and can be used in the house, whereupon I will change them all to save money).
I shall continue to save energy in general, to lower my bills, bills that have been forced up due to a weak scared public believing that there isn’t much left “So you have to pay more for it”.
I shall continue to water the garden with water from the water butt. Because it’s better for the plants AND it doesn’t cost me an outrageous amount (Over £4.00 a cubic metre for supply and waste).
I shall continue to drive old cars, one day…18 years time or so…. I may be forced to drive a hybrid or an electric one because I’ll have no choice.
Beautiful aeroplanes, from a very innovative company.
So innovative that the the Americans had to steal the design for Chuck Yaegers X plane from Miles, including the detachable cockpit. Sorry, they didn’t steal it, we were forced to hand it over as part of the trade of secrets during the war. It was one way traffic though.
Wasn’t there a Messenger based at Barton during the early 70’s?
What did the Star Wars movies and the USAAF have in common?
Bri 😀
A Galaxy to play with?
What did the Star Wars movies and the USAAF have in common?
Bri 😀
A Galaxy to play with?
That’s wonderfully muddled thinking.
You are saying that because the governments of the world are, all too slowly, coming round to believing the weight of scientific opinion on man’s effect on the climate, that we shouldn’t because governments are not trustworthy.
I think you need to sit and consider what you wrote in the cold light of day.
Moggy
No, Governments are not to be trusted on any subject you ever care to mention. Climate change is no exception.
Misinform the people into paying more tax. Can you see a pattern emerging here?
The governments are cherry picking what they want to say, as always and just like the 45 minute threat from Iraq (Although I 100% support the overthrowing of such nations and I didn’t need a false excuse).
In the 4bn years of this planet, there has been thousands of cycles of ice or scorch. The present warming is part of that. Mans affect is a bit like a fart in outer space.
99% of mans polution falls back on the soil.
The ozone damaging stuff…..er, sorry, it actually wasn’t….the hole seems to be mending.
That’s wonderfully muddled thinking.
You are saying that because the governments of the world are, all too slowly, coming round to believing the weight of scientific opinion on man’s effect on the climate, that we shouldn’t because governments are not trustworthy.
I think you need to sit and consider what you wrote in the cold light of day.
Moggy
No, Governments are not to be trusted on any subject you ever care to mention. Climate change is no exception.
Misinform the people into paying more tax. Can you see a pattern emerging here?
The governments are cherry picking what they want to say, as always and just like the 45 minute threat from Iraq (Although I 100% support the overthrowing of such nations and I didn’t need a false excuse).
In the 4bn years of this planet, there has been thousands of cycles of ice or scorch. The present warming is part of that. Mans affect is a bit like a fart in outer space.
99% of mans polution falls back on the soil.
The ozone damaging stuff…..er, sorry, it actually wasn’t….the hole seems to be mending.
Woody Allan, in a taxi with a girl “You’re so pretty I can hardly keep my eyes on the meter” (I’ve actually used this in real life………and it paid off!)
And from Sink the Turpitz, in a mini submarine under her.
“The hatch won’t open”
“That’s because there’s a ruddy great battleship on top of it”
Woody Allan, in a taxi with a girl “You’re so pretty I can hardly keep my eyes on the meter” (I’ve actually used this in real life………and it paid off!)
And from Sink the Turpitz, in a mini submarine under her.
“The hatch won’t open”
“That’s because there’s a ruddy great battleship on top of it”