dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dove/Heron Identification #1261648
    dhfan
    Participant

    How about de Havilland, as that’s who built them. Nothing to do with Hawker Siddeley at the time.

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1261652
    dhfan
    Participant

    I hate to disagree with somebody who really knows what he’s talking about, when I’m only reading about it but…

    According to Vulcan 607, which I agree is an excellent read, they didn’t use Red Shrimp at all, relying on the pylon-mounted Dash 10 ECM equipment liberated from Honington’s Buccaneers.

    in reply to: Gloster Meteor Prototypes #1262539
    dhfan
    Participant

    No idea. Glosters at Hucclecote?

    The Vampire was flying by January 1944 too. First flight was September 1943 IIRC.

    If it didn’t say Meteor I’d say Vampire is quite likely. Hertford’s probably only a couple of minutes in a jet, about 10 miles, from Hatfield.

    in reply to: Vulcan 607 – An awesome book! #1262601
    dhfan
    Participant

    The paperback version is now available, got mine this morning from a very well known UK supermarket for the sum of £3.73 its No2 in their chart.
    See this link http://www.tesco.com/books/chart/paperback.asp

    Off work ill at the moment so should be able to read this and some of the other hundred odd books I’ve bought over the years and never got round to reading.

    Paul

    Thanks for the tip. I allowed myself to be dragged to Tescos. 🙂

    in reply to: Gloster Meteor Prototypes #1262921
    dhfan
    Participant

    No information at all – but an educated guess.

    DG206 was the first Meteor prototype to fly, powered by Halford (DH) H.1 engines due to delays with the RR engines.

    The first production Meteor flew in January 1944 so I wonder if the DH-engined prototype was based at or visited Hatfield, presumably no longer being needed for the Meteor programme.

    in reply to: General Discussion #321355
    dhfan
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Hurrifan;1095160]

    Yes? too young to remember them…just !:D

    reckon the Vauxhall might have been sold largely outside the UK?

    http://www.observergroup.net/ob92back/stories.htm

    http://www.abc.net.au/wa/stories/s938315.htm

    http://www.carsurvey.org/review_24997.html

    http://www.christmas-island.org/page44.html

    http://www.funtrivia.com/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=0&Number=235637&page=&vc=1

    and then there are these beauts….

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/DINKY-TOYS-MECCANO-VAUXHALL-VANGUARD-BLUE_W0QQitemZ110099423885QQihZ001QQcategoryZ56330QQcmdZViewItem

    thanks for the link..damned usefull !

    Plenty old enough to remember Standard Vanguards.

    I can type Rover Cortina and say I had one. It doesn’t prove it existed.

    The Ebay link is also a Standard Vanguard, whatever the seller wants to call it.

    Car model names are fiercely protected by manufacturers. Daimler had to change the name of the Dart because Dodge (?) complained, Ford tried to stop Tim Dutton selling his Sierra kits, (and failed because the Dutton came first), Jaguar asked Armstrong-Siddeley for permission before using the SS-Jaguar name.

    Since there definitely was a Standard Vanguard, 3 different models over a period of around 14 years, I’m pretty certain there was never a Vauxhall with the same name.

    Type “Vauxhall Vanguard” into Google you get 49 results. “Standard Vanguard” gives 18,600, which for a car that went out of production comfortably over 40 years ago is impressive.

    I’m now confident in stating there was no such thing as a Vauxhall Vanguard.

    in reply to: Auto/Plane names #1933969
    dhfan
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Hurrifan;1095160]

    Yes? too young to remember them…just !:D

    reckon the Vauxhall might have been sold largely outside the UK?

    http://www.observergroup.net/ob92back/stories.htm

    http://www.abc.net.au/wa/stories/s938315.htm

    http://www.carsurvey.org/review_24997.html

    http://www.christmas-island.org/page44.html

    http://www.funtrivia.com/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=0&Number=235637&page=&vc=1

    and then there are these beauts….

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/DINKY-TOYS-MECCANO-VAUXHALL-VANGUARD-BLUE_W0QQitemZ110099423885QQihZ001QQcategoryZ56330QQcmdZViewItem

    thanks for the link..damned usefull !

    Plenty old enough to remember Standard Vanguards.

    I can type Rover Cortina and say I had one. It doesn’t prove it existed.

    The Ebay link is also a Standard Vanguard, whatever the seller wants to call it.

    Car model names are fiercely protected by manufacturers. Daimler had to change the name of the Dart because Dodge (?) complained, Ford tried to stop Tim Dutton selling his Sierra kits, (and failed because the Dutton came first), Jaguar asked Armstrong-Siddeley for permission before using the SS-Jaguar name.

    Since there definitely was a Standard Vanguard, 3 different models over a period of around 14 years, I’m pretty certain there was never a Vauxhall with the same name.

    Type “Vauxhall Vanguard” into Google you get 49 results. “Standard Vanguard” gives 18,600, which for a car that went out of production comfortably over 40 years ago is impressive.

    I’m now confident in stating there was no such thing as a Vauxhall Vanguard.

    in reply to: General Discussion #321457
    dhfan
    Participant

    Possibly cheating…

    The original name for the Morris Minor was the Mosquito. 🙂

    in reply to: Auto/Plane names #1934020
    dhfan
    Participant

    Possibly cheating…

    The original name for the Morris Minor was the Mosquito. 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #321465
    dhfan
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Hurrifan;1094736]

    Vauxhall Vanguard? Never heard of it. Standard Vanguard yes./QUOTE]

    Try google or here; http://dave2869.picturebook.org.uk/p29979873.html

    Sad end to a fine old car!

    Nice try. However, that’s a Standard Vanguard Phase 1.

    http://www.motorbase.com/vehicle/by-id/1118/gallery.ehtml

    in reply to: Auto/Plane names #1934026
    dhfan
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Hurrifan;1094736]

    Vauxhall Vanguard? Never heard of it. Standard Vanguard yes./QUOTE]

    Try google or here; http://dave2869.picturebook.org.uk/p29979873.html

    Sad end to a fine old car!

    Nice try. However, that’s a Standard Vanguard Phase 1.

    http://www.motorbase.com/vehicle/by-id/1118/gallery.ehtml

    in reply to: General Discussion #321596
    dhfan
    Participant

    Vauxhall Vanguard? Never heard of it. Standard Vanguard yes.

    Consul – Airspeed/Ford
    Thunderbolt – Republic/BSA (m/c)

    Spitfire as well as Supermarine/Triumph was also a 60s/70s BSA motorcycle.

    Scout – Thomas-Morse/BSA

    in reply to: Auto/Plane names #1934100
    dhfan
    Participant

    Vauxhall Vanguard? Never heard of it. Standard Vanguard yes.

    Consul – Airspeed/Ford
    Thunderbolt – Republic/BSA (m/c)

    Spitfire as well as Supermarine/Triumph was also a 60s/70s BSA motorcycle.

    Scout – Thomas-Morse/BSA

    in reply to: Aviation museums with good access by public transport #1268226
    dhfan
    Participant

    The lighting at Cosford’s much better than Hendon in as much as there is some. The main display hangars are well laid out and well lit. The National Cold War Exhibition is a little gloomy in places but still better than Hendon.

    I guess Cosford Halt only serves the Museum and RAF station. As the name suggests it’s a halt rather than a full-scale station so how many trains stop there I’ve no idea. Unless a native of the area volunteers to find out, an email to the museum may help.

    in reply to: The oldest AIRWORTHY jet???? #1276296
    dhfan
    Participant

    I think, in common parlance, it is safe to assume that a Jet Engine is a Gas Turbine for all intents and purposes. And when someone refers to a jet engine, they are generally referring to a gas turbine. A turbo prop is simply another variation of a gas turbine engine. Ergo, a turbo prop is a jet engine.

    Rob, I totally agree with you – until your last line.

    A turbo-prop is not a jet engine. If we extend your statement to include turboshafts, as it’s also a gas turbine, a Westland Wessex is a jet.

    Gas turbines had been known of for years. It was Frank Whittle, and Pabst von Ohain (sp?) who reasoned the exhaust, or jet efflux, could be used to propell the aircraft directly, rather than using the power generated to drive a propellor.

    I agree any residual exhaust thrust may aid performance – but so does a Merlin with ejector exhausts. 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 3,092 total)