dark light

dhfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 3,092 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft in RAF service #1424110
    dhfan
    Participant

    Yes, the D.H.125 is what I meant. 🙂

    Originally referred to within DH as the “Jet Dragon”. I rather like that.

    in reply to: Aircraft in RAF service #1424124
    dhfan
    Participant

    Gunbus? No idea of actual years, was it obsolete before 1918?

    in reply to: Airspace #1424127
    dhfan
    Participant

    I know I keep going on about it, and my views on architectural lunacy are well known, but the best thing yet designed to keep aeroplanes in is a hangar.

    I agree with Kev and David, Duxford is an exhibit in it’s own right, but given it’s position as a division of the IWM, unfortunately it can’t remain in a time-warp. However, sympathetic developmnent doesn’t seem to have crossed anybody’s mind.

    The attached pics are liberated from the Cosford website. Despite the new building being well underway, the old page hasn’t been deleted, although I suspect there’s no link to it now.

    In my opinion, their plans were far better than the ludicrous building under construction. Following text is also directly copied from the same page:

    “We aim to build an additional 14,300 square metres of environmentally controlled display space to protect and preserve up to 20 historic aircraft of international significance and provide a welcoming and accessible display for the public.

    In keeping with Cosford’s hi-tech ethos and its prime location on the Wolverhampton – Telford High Technology Corridor, the main building is being planned to incorporate what will be Europe’s largest solar roof. This will enable the building to produce more non-fossil fuel power than the Museum currently consumes.”

    dhfan
    Participant

    You, or more to the point I, learn something everyday.

    I think there was a Great Western Castle class steam loco named Spitfire too.

    dhfan
    Participant

    I’d never heard of the air rifle until yesterday, or most of the things on that list!

    dhfan
    Participant

    And they still managed to leave out the BSA Spitfire motorcycle and air rifle.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1426601
    dhfan
    Participant

    Doesn’t “pass” mean pass, not stop? 🙂

    in reply to: Let's have another picture quiz #1426606
    dhfan
    Participant

    I’d thought Lysander but discounted it. I’ve obviously never looked at the rear canopy closely enough.

    Wonky, yes you would but in this case it’s the aircraft that’s wonky. 🙂

    in reply to: Let's have another picture quiz #1426671
    dhfan
    Participant

    I’m beginning to suspect it’s the right way up but “wonky”.

    in reply to: Let's have another picture quiz #1426789
    dhfan
    Participant

    When I said “Gloster” I had revised it from “Gloster or Westland”.

    Was that a bad move?

    in reply to: Let's have another picture quiz #1427035
    dhfan
    Participant

    Yes you are warm. It does look like Hawker construction.

    No it is not Hawker construction.

    Mark

    Gloster?

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1427038
    dhfan
    Participant

    On water, with a landplane – possibly. 🙂

    in reply to: Blackburn Firebrand #1427045
    dhfan
    Participant

    It looks sort of squashed somehow.

    The Python must have been one of Armstrong-Siddeley’s very few dogs. Their engines were generally well up to the standards of the day.
    I haven’t yet read the link, (I’m supposed to be feeding my face) but the Eagle was a piston engine IIRC. Lord Hives (or plain Ernest as he may have still been then) put the kibosh on that too I believe.

    dhfan
    Participant

    Yes, but could you afford the fuel bill – the manual V12’s were pre HE engines….

    Bruce

    I’ve had a plan, but extremely shallow wallet, for many years to take a very early XJ12, install a manual box and an HE (or even late 6.0 litre) lump… and grin a lot. 😀

    in reply to: De Havilland Museum #1427055
    dhfan
    Participant

    dhfan

    You are quite right – the current scheme is not at all appropriate!

    The short nacelles are indeed still there. We took the flap ram covers off, and were amazed to find they had just been faired over with the nacelle extensions!

    Bruce

    Wonderful!
    Shame they can’t see the light of day again. Not an option as it would obviously damage the airframe to remove the fairings but it would be nice to see what it originally looked like.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 3,092 total)