dark light

GrahamSimons

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 680 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wright Bros 110th Anniversary #943784
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    Richard Pearce beat em anyways!

    in reply to: B-29 Superfortress help required #951268
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    Am I allowed to say try a certain book on the type by a certain author that has LOTS of build pictures in it?:rolleyes:

    in reply to: TFCs P-40B is heading back to the US #951471
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    As long as they bubble wrap it, use plenty of tape and remember to affix the correct postage it should be fine. 🙂

    For gawd’s sake dont ANYONE put ‘P-40B DO NOT BEND’ on it…. or someone will try and fold it, and then scrawl on the package ‘OH YES THEY DO!‘ (it’s happened to me with more than one package!)

    in reply to: Vintage Aircraft Magazine #951743
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    GORDY…. I can easily run off ‘replicas’ at cost (I can bind a3 as A4 folded) if anyone wants them, but I’m not going to do so without your permission!

    in reply to: Vintage Aircraft Magazine #971467
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    Have you tried Brian Cox?

    in reply to: Goma Airport, DRC, abandoned aircraft #978625
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    Besides, what would a B-29 or a TU-4, be doing in Africa? You’d have more luck finding a Stirling in China.

    Or Spitfires in Burma?

    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    What’s wrong with it? Simples
    1 – remove the use of nicknames, and only allow proper names. This will stop people hiding behind pseudonyms.
    2 – remove the post count

    Bad spelling, grammar and punctuation: on a personal level, I loathe them, but there is no way to change them – and for many English is not their first language. Solution – show some tolerance, ignore it.
    Trolls, assholes and idiots: – solution – it’s illegal to shoot them, so live with them, deal with it and try to politely change their ways.
    Burma Spitfires: that thread in my view is totally a complete waste of space, allowing certain people to live and act out their fantasies and ego, but that said, it has a total right to exist. Solution, if you don’t like, don’t read and do not comment just for the hell of it!!

    in reply to: Civil aircraft aircrews in the Berlin Airlift #996862
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    The Berlin Airlift by Robert Jackson, Patrick Stephens Ltd 1988 ISBN 0-85059-881-8

    in reply to: Why do they bother – spot the mistake #1002860
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    You think that’s bad… try this for size!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]221968[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Mew Gull Heading Back To Old Warden #1009486
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    All credit to those who are financing these projects…. deH 86 Express anyone….????

    Planemike

    Myself, Sir Adrian Swire and Viv Bellamy were working on building a DH86 in the early 1990s – with metal and timber being cut – but the project slowly ground to a halt. Mike Russell and others were also considering a DH86 around ‘project X’ – a DH86 centre-section that survives(d) but nothing came of it. I still am holding out hopes, because I do know there is a complete set of manufacturing drawings out there – perhaps a job for New Zealand!?

    In a similar vein, I was hearing rumours at OW on sunday that ‘maybe’ the Avro Tutor and Hawker Tomtit could be ‘exchanged’ for other things that include the LVG?

    in reply to: Mew Gull Heading Back To Old Warden #1010661
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    Any of the D.H 71 Tiger Moth or technical school TK.2 or 4 would fit my bill!

    Was’nt Ron Souch working on a DH71 at one time?

    in reply to: XB-70 No2 Info Sought #932273
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    Since ‘skyshooter’ clearly refuses to believe what he is being advised here, I went back to some of my primary source documentation I used in my Pen & Sword book on the XB-70, viz: ‘B-70 Aircraft Study Final Report Volumes 1-4’ produced by L J Taube, Study Manager, North American Rockwell, dated April 1972. This is a massive work, totally well over 2000 pages.

    Within Volume 3 SD72–SH-0003, pages III-161, III-162, there is a description of the airframe and wing structure, which I have scanned and attached. Although details are on both pages, the key part is on page 162, and I quote: ‘The dihedral of the wing on air vehicle No.2 was 5 degrees while air vehicle No.1 had a dihedral of zero degrees. (This was a development change which occurred too late to incorporate on air vehicle No.1’
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]221534[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]221535[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Hermann Goering's uniform #932908
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    Colour film in the late forties was pretty much in its infancy.

    Colours in images from the 1940s will have degraded over time

    The white balance on the pics you saw will not have been corrected

    The pictures above may not be colour balanced either

    Your monitor is almost certainly not corrected for accurate colour reproduction.

    Moggy

    Whatever – of course you know what I saw, and how my monitor is set up – I knew spyware was good, but I never realised it was THAT good!

    in reply to: Hermann Goering's uniform #932946
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    I’ve seen colour pictures of him being interviewed just after the war, and his uniform looks a much more light blue than this – just a comment!

    in reply to: XB-70 No2 Info Sought #933007
    GrahamSimons
    Participant

    I’ve dug through the image file, and come up with this one. It shows AV2 under contraction – the wing panels are outboard of the lines of men working wing.fuse join.[ATTACH=CONFIG]221482[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 680 total)