Snapper, i think my points do have some relevance, Ken from the very beginning expected us to believe the story and was quick to patronise anybody who reaosnably disagreed, fair point though that some were unreasonable. Ken did use his war service AND his age as if this meant everyone had to listen and sit back and believe, anyone who he expected to be younger was treated like didnt have a clue.
“”And you of course would not have been “at times patronising, threatening and offensive.” “””””
No i dont believe i would, i would NEVER threaten someone or deliberately patronise them. To use and old cliche, two wrongs dont make a right, to sum up what i mean i shall jsut say that fault lies on both sides here and Ken’s behaviour is hardly faultless.
Anyway, i DEFINATELY agree that this matter has come to an end, it was a very sad week when the conspiracy theory had some of the highest number of replies ever seen and other more relevant threads were ignored,
many thanks for the reply Snapper and your work to resolve the situation and also i wish Ken every success in finding proof for his story.
Best Regards, Steve 🙂
Sign In
