dark light

Stan hyd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 563 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Royal Navy Outlook #2017207
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    they never should have stopped building Type 23’s should have been continual.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2017249
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    dam it – stupid using Yank tech

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2017254
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    they shouldnt be able to block the sale of astute should they?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2017281
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Im sure the UK would be happy to sell the Australians Astutes probably in the region of 2.5 billion dollars per sub. Good buddies after all and our ship yards could do with the business 😛

    Would we be allowed to sell you chaps nuclear reactors? would australia even want them?

    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #2017295
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    You can say that all you want. I reckon yes they will train pilots but after a year It’ll become an active warship, taking part in ops e.t.c

    That being said British Carrier are basically training ships at the moment – when was the last time one of them dropped a bomb in anger? The Indian carrier INS Viraat is the same at the moment.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Outlook #2017364
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    60 escorts – god who wouldnt love that.

    I have always said that for me the Ideal world would be the following.

    8 Type 45’s
    10 C1’s
    12 C2’s
    18 C3’s

    All i need to do is make the same amount of money as bill gates and Ill buy the dam things myself for the RN.

    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #2017561
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    I think hes getting confused with the Soviet aircraft carrier Minsk in that interview or they are just copying and pasting from a different time.

    No way varyag is going to be amusement park after the work they have done on it.

    in reply to: next gen USN frigate #2017630
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    http://www.geocities.com/pentagon/barracks/7248/ff21.jpg

    in reply to: Navy surrenders one new aircraft carrier in budget battle #2017774
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    when I saw the title of the thread my heart actually missed a beat.

    Agree though, I want the Air Force to keep their mits of the JSF and if this is the way to make sure that the carrier always has a decent number of wings on the deck then I’m a happy man.

    in reply to: Carriers for everyone #2018056
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Im personally one of those nutter conservative members who wants a United States of Europe.

    But I only want the following nations in it.

    UK / France / Germany / Spain / Italy / Poland/ Denmark / Holland / Belgium

    If I could just have all of those in one group I would be happy. I would create

    1 Army – Standing force of 300,000 troops
    1 Navy – 9 Aircraft Carriers based on the CVF
    1 Airforce – Mix of Eurofighters/F-35/ Rafeals

    Begin work on a new 5 Generation fighter

    Just imagine that. For me it would be perfect, but only if we were determined in our use of force. A little like the yanks.

    What can I saw im a nut. Its mainly about building a Navy that is capable of being considered a true tier 1 navy.

    in reply to: USN LHA/LHD question: why no ski-jump? #2018190
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    It may sound stupid but how about an inflatable one. If that was even possible.

    in reply to: Carriers for everyone #2018197
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    here we go – how about this one

    http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/3334/generic4.png

    in reply to: Carriers for everyone #2018343
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Except with a 24 aircraft purchase you’d only be able to deploy circa 12 at a time. Not worth the cost of a carrier. Better to spend the money spent on the carrier on tankers, further amphibs or additional MRH/NFH-90’s.

    shhh dont ruin it. Ill take 18 to sea 😛

    in reply to: Carriers for everyone #2018357
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    Country your carrier is for: Australia
    Type of carrier: CATOBAR
    Weight: 40,000 tonnes
    Length: 270m
    Width: 65m
    Power supply: Integrated Full Electric Propulsion (IFEP)
    Number of Aircraft: 24 F/A-18Fs 2 Hawkeye AWACS 2 Seakings
    Type of Aircraft : As above – using the 24 F/A-18Fs bought recently
    Defensive weapons : 2 RAM launchers
    CATBAR

    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #2018392
    Stan hyd
    Participant

    hell the chinese are gonna develop all this stuff anyways.

    If we had already got our first CVF in the water I would be up for selling them the 2nd – more industry work for our shipyards 😛

    To be honest though, if I was Brazil I would be willing to send my Carrier and engineers over to china and go through all the lessons they have learned and information about the catapults.

    All in exchange for a co op on carrier design / production.

    Im talking rubbish today though

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 563 total)