Another picture on the plane (this time on the beach as a memorial) is at
http://www.chez.com/eternalflight/413663.html
Note the name of the page!
“which means that the propeller at one time was turned.”
Probably to make it lay flat on its belly easier!
What we can’t see cleary is the other 2 blades on the recovered airframe. Also the ‘soon after’ picture of D’Quake is unclear. We can see the top two blades bent back. But the bottom 2 are either ‘cut off’ or ‘buried’ or bent back and buried. They do not look like they are going forward at all..
The ‘buried picture of 663’ shows on the top of one prop and it is forced back. We know it is 663 becuase the fuselage is silver (and the markings still present). What we need is a soon after picture of 663 to compare. However the first recovery picture does SEEM to show 2 forward (the top 2) and the other 2 props back (look carefully bottom left). I would image that it would not be impossible for the props to have rotated 180 degrees either during recovery or by brute force…
I have to say based on the photo evidence ALONE I would be more inclinded to believe the recovered aircraft is 663…
“the prop blades are bent backwards after landing”.. From the pictures it is obvious BOTH airframes have there prop blades bent back. (As is normal after a forced landing).
So while being dragged is an option, also being ‘attacked’ while sticking out of sand by the various French kids could also be an explanation!
There is a floatplane in there.. Shall we put it in a garden pond and then try to ‘discover it?’
I will put a note on Barnstormers…..
Sorry no info on this man but he was flying Spitfire F.Vb EP749. Which flew into hill near Mary Tavy, Devon 02.12.1942. Plt Wladyslaw Ciechanowski (Polish) of 19 Sqn killed
also ask on here:
http://www.rafcommands.com
and/or
So that is ‘1 all’ then in that particular B-17 verses Hurricanes match so far..
“Villiard’s search first took him to Malaysia, where a Royal Australian Air Force Buffalo had been bulldozed into the ground when a palm oil plantation was established at its crash site, but he was denied permission to dig it up.”
Does this mean it is still there??
See here as well:
http://www.airpirates.com/gallery/Malaysia
At least I have a bit more info about the air pirates expedition results now as the info is a bit sparce!
PB4Y-2 Privateer
http://home.sprynet.com/~anneled/ColdWar.html
Also see:
http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_346.shtml
http://www.heroinflight.com/planes.html
and
The latter 3 all say B-24 but I reckon Privateer (definately Consolidateed not Vickers!)
According to the Air Britain ‘Big Book’ – (Mark 12 knows about this now!) the 4th Proctor was indeed G-AIED
FL200
It must be G-AIED as that would tie in with the date of the BoB film
I think 1947 would be way to early
“I just love the UK National health – anythings possible”
Yes you could come from Portugal get the op done on the NHS and then win £60,000 on a TV Reality show
No that is just to unbelivable
OK Back to the Proctor
As it so happens I am reading a magazine article about BoB Proctukas at this very moment!. It says 4 Proctors were bought for BoB Film
G-AIEY, G-ALOK, G-AIAE and ??? (from Shoreham)
Only the first 2 were converted to ‘Stukas’ and only the first one flown by Vic Bellamy
Says all ended up being bought by Jeff Hawke and ended up at Pinewood.
Says one given false reg of G-ATIO (poss for a film) and a second (probably G-ALOK) ended up being in background of 1972 Spike Milligan film ‘Adolf Hitler – My part in his downfall’ and ‘appears to have been destroyed in the making of the film’
The article ends up with saying ‘last known Proctuka G-AIEY was said to be in Pinewood Studios Buckinghamshire. Last recorded sighting in the early 1970’s stated aircraft in ppor condition and not for sale. Rumours suggest it was recloacted to Derbyshire in 1977’
Right back to the photo…
First problem. The Proctors were at Pinewood in Bucks, not Borehamwood in Herts (though the distance is not to far between these 2 studios and they could have been moved)
Secondly, One film studio could easily be mistaken as another – I am not doubting your memory or pictures Mark!! But were they at Pinewood?
Thirdly – The Proctor had obviously NOT been converted to a Stuka – The rear cockpit decking is still ‘evident’ – the converted ones were ‘glass’
So I reckon it is either G-AIAE (the uncoverted one) or the unknown one From Shoreham
Was that one of the BoB Proctor ‘Stukas’??
“another shilling in the meter or something?”
Or kicked the server