The ones to avoid are Row 10, 29 and 40, they don’t recline! 😮

Proper Exit rows are 11 (doors 2) and 30 (doors 3).

No mention of if they’re following FCA’s decision to add extra seat pitch on long haul though.

That publicity photograph on that website certainly doesn’t look like BY’s average seat pitch, it looks far too generous! 😮

Very bizarre schedule. Can’t see it being a massive success although we’ll just have to wait and see as usual.

I have to disagree – GSM want TPA, Flywho want PIE. GSM want MIA, Flywho want FLL

Yes, but do you know why???

TPA and PIE are what… all of less than 10km apart. Flywho only want PIE because they have no previous airline experience and think everyone will know where it is. WRONG!

PIE also offered them a deal they couldn’t refuse, no fees whatsoever as far as I heard.

As for MIA, well… who wouldn’t go into FLL instead. MIA is a dredful airport, overcrowded and a nightmare to get through. Again, with these two, Flywho were offered another similar deal. I don’t think there is currently any scheduled traffic from the UK to FLL (correct me if I’m wrong).

Believe me, there are more conversations between GSM and Flywho HQ’s than you would believe, I used to work there remember!

Globespan’s boss and Flywho’s boss were in talks last year with Flywho wanting Globespan to operate their flights or provide an AOC for them. I believe they are still buddies now.

Maybe there’s a connection here somewhere with the choice of routes especially?

The LAS-PHL is on a completly different a/c type though I believe.
Amadeus lists US196 LAS-PHL as a 757

This is quite common with US carriers. I think they do the same into LGW but the flight number originates in TPA from what I remember.

United are another one who do this often too. Strange really as if you think about it, you could end up with two flights in the air at the same time, both with the same flight number if one was delayed and other left on time.