dark light

seahawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 3,269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Brazilian F-X news. #2655771
    seahawk
    Participant

    How many used Flankers do we have available that have been well maintained (after going into storage) and have flawless maintenance records to look at? Furthermore they would need an upgrade.

    I think MLUs are perfect for now. And in 10 years time Brazil could probably get EF or Rafale (for the price of the M2k5) and one would know if th Russian AirForce will operate the SU-35 in numbers, as it is currently planed.

    in reply to: C-27J Spartan #2655777
    seahawk
    Participant

    But the displays of the Italian G.222 were always worth watching, at least you could hope or something going wrong. 😀

    in reply to: Ten from Go-Fly@EDI #718179
    seahawk
    Participant

    nice pics, but the “go fiesta” always seemd a bit silly to me

    in reply to: pics from a sunny day at DUS (56k unfriendly) #718183
    seahawk
    Participant

    And finally a rare visitor to DUS and surely one you would not want to miss

    in reply to: pics from a sunny day at DUS (56k unfriendly) #718185
    seahawk
    Participant

    And some more, as we had an easterly wind on sunday which is quite rare at DUS.

    The 757 is from Hola Airlines based at Palma de Mallorca, and was new to DUS

    in reply to: pics from a sunny day at DUS (56k unfriendly) #718187
    seahawk
    Participant

    If you don´t mind I would like to share some more pics from the last weekend

    I hope you enjoy

    in reply to: pics from a sunny day at DUS (56k unfriendly) #718191
    seahawk
    Participant
    in reply to: Which Camera? #1970076
    seahawk
    Participant

    Well my experience tells me, that third party lenses (like Sigma or Tamron) are close on some occasions, but also in the end the original lenses are a tad better.
    So I would always decide based on the lenses. There is no sense in getting a 10D or something and adding a medicore Sigma (those cheap lenses from them) to it.

    Apart from that I think the buffer size is important. I´m using the Nikon D100 and it has about 6 frames buffer. Which is adequate for my needs. More would be nice. On that I would strongly recommend the D70 which has a pratically endless buffer with a high-speed CF-card when shooting JPGs.

    in reply to: Today @EDI #719613
    seahawk
    Participant

    The globespan rocks

    in reply to: pics from a sunny day at DUS (56k unfriendly) #719854
    seahawk
    Participant

    I made more then 350 pics today. I need to process the rest later today and tomorrow. I´ll mail you the AB in 1024×768

    in reply to: BHX 28/07/04 #719856
    seahawk
    Participant

    Very good for a first try

    in reply to: A few from my own archive……. #719866
    seahawk
    Participant

    Great pics for an non digital camera

    in reply to: Which Camera? #1970107
    seahawk
    Participant

    I have the D100, which has the same power pack as the D70. One fully charged pack is good for about 500 spotting pics. My current one still shows full after 568 pics. I recommend to buy a second unit, but that should be enough.
    Apart from that, let me give you some more advice. If you have lenses that you can use on one of the cameras, then it is obvious to go with that camera. If you are starting with no equipment for both, then take a look at the lenses Canon and Nikon offer. Then decide which you would want and then buy the body that fits. Lenses are much more important then the body and they last much longer.

    in reply to: Brazilian F-X news. #2656354
    seahawk
    Participant

    I think the best solution is getting the used F-16MLUs. They are quite close to the M2k5 capability wise and costs much less. They would be sufficent for a decade at least. In a decade from today. And then the Brazilians will also have to search for an F-5 replacement. Which would mean a larger buy and not only 12 planes which would be a legacy force when the other planes need to be replaced.

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2656362
    seahawk
    Participant

    45% composites. Well what is that talk about the jet with the highest use of composites all about then. That is a pretty standard construction for todays technology then. So it should not have any huge advantage over other contemporary fighters.
    And thx for the pic of the Zhuk. I think Arthur wanted to point out that there is very few space left between the radar antenna and the first bulkhead (cockpit section), It could be really problematic to squezze in the full Zhuk-M radar system in that space.
    It was not a question of the antenna diameter.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 3,269 total)