dark light

seahawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,791 through 2,805 (of 3,269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cope India – 2004 #2680491
    seahawk
    Participant

    Originally posted by PLA
    IAF pilots score over Yanks
    Chandan Nandy
    Gwalior, February 25

    United States Air Force (USAF) pilot Captain David Skalicky and his colleagues from the Alaska-based Pacific Command met their match among their Indian counterparts during the six-day Cope 2004 Indo-US Air Force exercise.

    The exercise, which began on February 19, was the first between the two air forces involving fighter combat.

    The score in the “match-up” is yet to be quantified, but the Indian pilots were upbeat. Several had a common refrain: “We gave them a few surprises in air combat. They have begun to respect us, though we also learnt a great deal from them,” said one, pride writ large over his face.

    Six USAF F-15Cs were pitted against a range of Jaguars, MiG-21s, MiG-27s and the “fearsome” Sukhoi-30s.

    The exercise was meant to evaluate tactics, training and operational procedures. No senior officer from either country was willing to go on record on who scored most points. But some Indian pilots claimed the “kill ratio” was 4:1 in their favour.

    Air Marshal Ajit Bhavnani, who is senior Air Staff Officer at the Central Air Command, was more tempered. He said the exercise concluded with “mutual respect for each others’ skills” and that it should not be viewed as a “boxing match”.

    Did I predcit this. An India victory will be leaked, but no offical results will be made available to the public.

    What a surprise. 😀

    Both sides are happy. IAF gets good porpaganda, USAF gets a reason for the F/A-22. 😀

    in reply to: Cope India – 2004 #2680671
    seahawk
    Participant

    Perhaps they can achieve higher g-loads ??

    The Su-27 series is rather limited in the G-Load if it is using a very high internal fuel load.

    Perhaps the external tank and a lower internal fuel load allow higher G-Loads and therefore allow longer time spent doing ACM.

    -> just an idea.

    in reply to: worlds best ASW helicopter? #2680717
    seahawk
    Participant

    Why must i carry exocet ?

    You don´t like Penguin, Harpoon or their russian counterparts ??

    My suggestion would be the NFH90.

    in reply to: General Discussion #389382
    seahawk
    Participant

    But that is no DSLR. And you can´t put a 400mm lense on that camera.

    And you really want to have at least 200-300mm for aircraft photography.

    I would suggest the upcoming Nikon D70 at the moment. Best value for money at the moment.

    in reply to: Camera Question ? #1971942
    seahawk
    Participant

    But that is no DSLR. And you can´t put a 400mm lense on that camera.

    And you really want to have at least 200-300mm for aircraft photography.

    I would suggest the upcoming Nikon D70 at the moment. Best value for money at the moment.

    in reply to: news blog #2680909
    seahawk
    Participant

    Re: news blog

    Originally posted by pirate
    I just started a blog where i post the news i come across every morning here http://www.pirate.per.sg , just want to share with everybody, suggestions to improve are welcome.

    I think iSaw some of the pics over at dpreview.com – right ??

    in reply to: Rah-66 Comanche Cancelled #2681432
    seahawk
    Participant

    No no, you would want the avionics, the digital gadgets and the compatibility with the Armies vision of the digital battlefield.

    And especially the operating costs would be the same.

    My idea would be based on the A129 International. Add US avionics and improoved electro-optic systems. Add more armor.

    Keep the gun and 2 hardpoints on the stubwings.

    Ok here is my list oh what the army might buy :

    Fixed wing transport : C-27J and give the Air Force a fit
    LUH : S-76, Bell 427, MD Explorer
    Recce : A129, AH-1Z, MD600N

    in reply to: Rah-66 Comanche Cancelled #2681491
    seahawk
    Participant

    Originally posted by Beckles
    Maybe I’m missing something, but it seems to me the obvious answer is that the USA will just buy more AH-64D’s …

    The whole concept of an armed scout seems to make a lot less sense when they start to get expensive like the Comanche did and when the AH-64D’s have capabilities like the Longbow radar and MMW Hellfire missiles which enable them to find and kill their targets more effectively without having to expose themselves.

    I doubt that they would put out a new tender, if they would just want more AH-64Ds. And I furthermore doubt that the AH-64Ds would be much cheaper then the RAH-66 anyway.

    I think at best they are looking at a light attck helo in the A-129, Tigre or even AH-1 class. The worst thing would be another OH-58D Kiowa type. Meaning a militarized civilian helo that lacks power and protection to be really usefull.

    in reply to: Rah-66 Comanche Cancelled #2681566
    seahawk
    Participant

    I´m really thinking about possible candidates for the recce role :

    – it must be readily available
    – it must be armed
    – must clearly be superior to the OH-58

    furthermore I guess they will want 2 seats only

    I only can think of the follwoing canidates :

    – A129 Mangusta
    – Eurocopter Tiger
    – AH-1 Cobra (yes I´m not joking)

    My bet is on the A-129 International with the LHTEC T800 engines. It seems like the logical choice.

    http://www.agusta.com

    in reply to: Rah-66 Comanche Cancelled #2681841
    seahawk
    Participant

    Honestly I think that move makes a lot of sense.

    I really want to see the tender for the recce helo.

    in reply to: Rah-66 Comanche Cancelled #2682550
    seahawk
    Participant

    Now they only need to get rid of the V-22 and buy some UH-60s + EH101 instead and they will be fine.

    I wonder what helicopter they will consider as a replacement. Perhaps the A-129 Mangusta as a scout ??

    in reply to: What cockpits have you already been sitting in? #2683472
    seahawk
    Participant

    Well let me say a lot. 😀

    Yet the best thing was a try on a real simulator.

    in reply to: Eurofighter status? #2683921
    seahawk
    Participant

    Well only think I heard is that british Mr. Hoon is pressing Germany to reduce the number of the EF order, so that the british can keep the same workshare but only buy a reduced number.

    Britain also wants changes to the equipment standard of Tranche 2 and a longer delivery schedule.

    German government has agreed to think about the proposal, but is offically (that is important – so don´t give a cent on it) commited to the 180 planes ordered,

    seahawk
    Participant

    Originally posted by Erez
    Are you suggesting that the IRIAF’s attack was our idea?
    By the way, my book, which is Israeli, mentions the IRANI attack, so why should anyone alse bother to hide it?
    Besides, that was self defence. The best experts through the world has admited this reactor has the ability to create the Plutonium which is used for nuclear bombs, and Saddam Hussien never missed a chance to say he will build nuclear weapons.
    I can recheck, but I think that Osirak was a 70 mega watt reactor, or more.
    A lot more then what they need for research.

    Yes, it could be said that the IRIAF attack was kind of an Israeli idea. It is well known that both countries cooperated in the destruction of the Iraqi nuclear programm, as it was seen as a thread to both countries.

    Furthermore there is nothing remarkable about the IDF/AF bombing. Compared to the bombing run of the IRIAF or the H3 blitz done by the IRIAF it was a quite boring mission.

    I always wondered why the IRIAF did not finish the reactor. Could it be that it was in Israels interest do fly the mission themselves, so that they could proove to other arab countries how superior there air force was ??
    On the other hand is it far fetched that the needed intelligence for the H3 bliz was given to Iran by Israel as a kind of compensation ? How on earth should the iRIAF have know about the air defences on Iraqs Western border area, without Israeli help ??

    in reply to: Tu-95MS bombers destroy targets in exercise #2684609
    seahawk
    Participant

    You can fire the KH-55s without the warhead – you know. And if they hit close enough, you can also claim that they did destroy their target.

    I do agree that it is more likely that a conventional armed cruise missile was used. But there is no proof in the article.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,791 through 2,805 (of 3,269 total)