dark light

seahawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 3,269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2375780
    seahawk
    Participant

    Libya tells nothing about the aircraft involved. Given the state of the armed forces under control by the loyalists, even a F-105 with a Litening pod and some LGBs could have attacked targets there without too many problems.

    What I would agree on however is that Rafale did some remarkable things out there. Or should I say the weapons used by Rafale were remarkable?

    in reply to: US Army UH-60 – serials/identify #2376149
    seahawk
    Participant

    UH-60A 88-26071
    UH-60A 87-24642

    in reply to: Light Air Support #2379426
    seahawk
    Participant

    Not after Afghanistan gets wound up. They’ll then be abslutely worthless and pointless and the question will be asked why manned light strike was pursued when unmanned light strike was so readily available.

    Well, if they are taken into service, it could be interesting. They could become a love relation between the unit and the special forces guys. I can imagine lots of stuff those light aircraft could be used for in the war on drugs and other minor conflicts. Kind of a modern time Air Commando Squadron.

    seahawk
    Participant

    They can go to 8000 but many airframes are over 7000 already.

    in reply to: Light Air Support #2381174
    seahawk
    Participant

    Probably quite an interesting assignment. Not good for reaching a high rank probably.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2381182
    seahawk
    Participant

    If they would use the same percentage the difference would be equal to the difference in thrust though.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2381877
    seahawk
    Participant

    I wonder which missile Rafale uses for SEAD….

    in reply to: Maritime C130 patrol aircraft for UK? #2387332
    seahawk
    Participant

    Or used ATR42, there are a few being retired by the airlines.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2310556
    seahawk
    Participant

    Which is solely the fault of the British defence ministry and not buying enough spares.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2313341
    seahawk
    Participant

    But there were already reports if illegal meddling by the British in the MMRCA competition. I think India should buy the best plane, which is Rafale and not be bribed into buying second rate equipment.

    in reply to: Boeing KC-46 #2314714
    seahawk
    Participant

    Civil interest for a 767-250 can be considered non existent.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314717
    seahawk
    Participant

    Got any proof of that it was a quick fix?[/url]

    The guys from JBG31 say so. that this position was used because of an urgent operational requirement by the UK. Now, they are considering the pros and cons of that position.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314865
    seahawk
    Participant

    I don’t think it’s a waste of money, but i think it requires a lot of money that few can afford… That and the fact that at the end, while started with more momentum for upgrades, it fell into the trap of “two cooks spoil the broth” (where the cooks here are actually more, the EADS members), while the Rafale, although without exports, follows a more reasonable upgrade path.

    P.S.: I can’t stand the targeting pod in the center hardpoint of the Typhoon instead of a fuel tank. It shouts “I wasn’t thought to bomb, someone forced me to along the way”.

    I was just joking, as some people to their most to make EF look bad. The targeting pod on the centre pylon is a quick fix and not the intended position. Although it seems that the position has some advantages when it comes to the field of view for the targeting pod.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314894
    seahawk
    Participant

    Ever heard about requirements? So if the Typhoon has crappy aerodynamics while being a souped up M2k, we must conclude that the Mirage had crappy aerodynamics as well and that it took Dassault some 3 decades from Mirage 3 to Rafale to get it finally right.:rolleyes::diablo:

    The M2k is a whole generation older and probably still more than a match for Typhoon. I think what he says is spot on.

    Up high the Typhoon can be beat be many aircraft and down low it can be beat by even more aircraft. It is probably the worst fighter currently in production. Waste of money. 😡

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2318419
    seahawk
    Participant

    One should not forget that the aerodynamically superior Rafale will get 90kn engines in the future. While Typhoon – well maybe somebody will buy Tranche 3B.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 3,269 total)