Another joke right?
Guess what? still not funny
But i got your line of thinking, just because an licitation is under investigation, all the others have the same problem?
Hey when the nuclear sub contracts will be canceled? or even the EC-725? because the NEW people behind it need they share on the Bribe..
Sorry, it is and a still being a very limited view
Regards
Rodrigo Monteiro
Do not get my wrong it has nothing to do with the country, I just do not trust politicians in any country.
And that is a classic case imho. No pressing need, no obvious reason for a new tender.
I really hope this is some kind of joke from you?
BTW Not funny at all and show a very limited view of the facts
What facts?
Facts like how Master Top Airlines got a cargo contract with the fedral post office? :diablo:
This tells us nothing about the aircraft. It just says:
New government in place. Bribes welcome. All parties invited to join in the bribing.
Do you have a source for this?
Sure Flug Revue 01 2011 – Visit JG71
Germany still plans to use Taurus on the Typhoons, but integration has been put back, as it is not a priority currently. The most pressing need in Germany is to train crews and especially instructors for the Typhoon fleet. Then work up the units full OC in the air to air role and then limited OC in the air to ground role for JBG 31.
Currently there are plenty Tornado crews around, which are fully combat ready and trained for using Taurus as well. On the other hand there are not many full combat ready Typhoon pilots around. Much of this is caused by the fact that a pilot needs to have at least 7 years of service left, to put him into the Typhoon course. So the Tornado and F-4 fleets have many highly experienced pilots around, while the Typhoons struggle to get a decent pilot fleet trained. Integration of new weapons, can wait at the moment.
Just FYI, they have already designed, built and even flight tested their own turbofan, the Kaveri. Its the critical metallurgical technologies like SCB that they don’t have and are looking to acquire. With Snecma’s help, the Kaveri will hopefully overcome its weight and thrust issues and production critical issues should be resolved by the time the AMCA prototype rolls out. So, its not the designing and building that is the difficult part for India right now- its the perfecting of the last 10% of what constitutes a reliable, working turbofan that meets 100% of its thrust, uptime and reliability requirements.
And if you start to produce EJ and 414 you get an inside view on 2 modern engines and so maybe you learn more than from one.
So, you are saying India should buy both the F414 and EJ200???
If they want to built and design their own engines in the future, I think one could say that it might make sense.
This is not a ‘design’ (it would never fly), but a concept art performed by world famous industrial designer Syd Mead (who made machines design for Blade Runner, Aliens and bunch of other cool movies) on contract with Lockheed, intended to kinda represent ATF design for PR purposes and ads plus to disinform Soviet spies and aircraft designers – not sure if it really could do the last thing
I think there was more than one design during the early ATF phase, which showed RCS reduced canard fighters. So I guess consideration was given to such layouts in the US as well.
AWCS will remain important. What we will see however that they will only work as emitters, while friendly aircraft will use datafusion and the returning radar pulses from the AWCS on their own or even in a networked fashion.
If you want to discuss of what plane is a reminder of the J-20 design, I would think that early ATF designs by Lockheed would qualify.

Those exchange ratio are still a total mystery to me :
Rafale VS F-16 : 4-2
Rafale VS F-22 : 0-2 (contrary to F-16s, F-22s managed no to get shot at at all, possibly because of the tremendous thrust allowing them to escape awkward situations)
Rafale VS Typhoon : 8-1 :confused:
F-22 > Rafale > F-16 > Typhoon seems correct to me.
Some funny posts.
The RAF could not deploy the Hawks to the Falklands, as the Hawks have no air-to-air refuelling capability and nobody would suggest having a subfleet of 6 airframes just for very limited use in the Falklands, where a fighter without a radar is useless during large parts of the year. With the F.3 being withdrawn the only aircraft suited for the mission is the Typhoon.
Exercises must be taken seriously, especially if the result is the same during different exercises. Rafale has dominated Typhoon whenever the two met. So even the biggest fanboy must see that Rafale is omnirole and better at every mission. Typhoon is a failed project.
For MMRCA Rafale must be the obvious choice, as it the best plane offered, but also expensive, so the awful Supper Horro might have a chance. Typhoon can only win through technology transfer and industrial co-operation. If it comes to the aircraft itself, it might be the worst of all contenders.
Well, apart from the deployment to Afghanistan, i think you are correct. Typhoon is a failure. Yet, I can imagine that partner status is something of interest to India, but more from an industrial point of view. But we know that politics play a big part in such purchases, if it would be different Rafale would be unbeatable.
You know that the goverment accelarted the retirement of the F.3 Tornado in the meantime?
And you also know that Germany, Italy and Spain are in the process of replacing their air defence fighters with the Typhoon first, while all have a fleet of capable strike aircraft ready in form of the Tornado, AMX, F-18 or Mirage F1.
If you look at the overall design it makes indeed sense that the lighter colored nozzles are TVC. TVC would reduce the need to move the canrds out of the neutral position to trim the aircraft in flight, which helps to reduce the RCS.