dark light

merkle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 960 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mig 15 #1238342
    merkle
    Participant

    try these people,
    I am sure i seen one of there videos a year ago with them clibing into, and looking at some Mig 15’s , I was after one myself a few years ago,
    Cheers

    Chris C

    http://www.russiantruck.co.uk/subsection.php?headers=air

    in reply to: Birlingham #1238973
    merkle
    Participant

    Birlingham

    Private collection I am afraid,
    I forget the owners name, But Hence to say it is his own private collection,

    I was gutted to see these airframes in such a state, But its not illegal, The owner owns them and can do as he wishes with them, thats just the way it is, My favourite there is the Meteor T-7 Wh166 ?, such a lovely old bird,
    the Vampire has pretty much had it though,
    theres a nice little collection there, If ever i had the Money/Space/and time,
    I would be interested in one of them if they were ever sold, But i dont think that will ever happen,Niether would I have the Money or space to do such a thing for quite a while ,
    Sadly I believe Birlingham is a NO GO, I hope you realise all the costs and Logistics and Cost of dismantling/Moving /Storing/ and thats before you start hunting for WHole aircraft, My canberra has skinted me out, but its
    worth it in the long run,:)

    merkle
    Participant

    piper cub

    I am sure mr Ken Wakefields piper cub, served in the normandy campaign,
    (author of “the blitz then a now”)
    I havent seen it in recent years, but i imagine its still flying ?? in USAAF colours

    in reply to: Vulcan Crash on Anglesey? #1239806
    merkle
    Participant

    Magnatometer

    Just a thought , But theres a few expert people about with Magnatometers,
    Forster Bomb Locators, it might be worth Approaching the base , and with Written Conformation, they may allow a survey,
    I was allowed to survey a Base , about 10 years ago, But never really had the equiptment until now,

    I imagine alot of it will be useless, But some parts “May” be of use to a restorer, or Museum ,
    as I said,
    Just a thought !;)

    I used to be on very good terms with a old Commanding officer of Valley, he was probably there in the 80s , Air Vice Marshal “Boz” Brian Robinson,

    But he moved away to another country years ago, and i havent seen him in ages, Shame really , as i bet he would have known a thing or to about Valley,
    being a Ex C/O

    in reply to: Meteor WK800 #1240611
    merkle
    Participant

    wk800

    for all the ready cash i got, i will have to set my dreams on the sennybridge hulk, if one day the dsa decide to sell,at least i am on there books for it,

    if i had a spare £5000, and land to put it and money to disasemble it, and transport, i would love WK800 , but as i havent , I wish anyone who gets her the best of luck, My meteor is gonna cost £300, Cheep, well not really considering its in 1 million pieces,and 15 to 20 ft deep:D WH194,

    in reply to: Jet Age recovery Group and WH887 website #1169819
    merkle
    Participant

    Chris were you also in W. A .R. S and a x i s 42 😀

    Ahh yes and dont forget Kompanie 1 !!,

    yes , this is all a bit like the re-enactment lark on here, FW190uk, you know what i am talking about , LOL :rolleyes:;):D

    And remember what you and I did with re-enactment when it got like so ??
    😉

    in reply to: Jet Age recovery Group and WH887 website #1169952
    merkle
    Participant

    Hi Chris

    I will leave aside your comments on the “Value” of recovered material, as my views on this are well known. But one point I would like to raise re your project is that of obtaining permits to excavate aircraft that fall into your stated area of interest, in which crew members have lost their lives.

    We all know that during wartime many recoveries were carried out in less than ideal circumstances and often their was little record keeping or apparent accountability with regard to ensuring human remains were fully recovered. However post WW2 there seems to have been a concerted effort on the part of the MOD to sort out this situation and they considerbly tightened up procedures. Of course though due to the nature of an aircraft crash – particulalrly a higher speed post-war crash, this did not neccesarily mean they found any more of the unfortunate airmen involved. – They did, however, in most cases, record just what they did or did’nt find! 😮

    Now these records are available to the PMA and they do indeed check all available records when considering a permit application (as they should!) and this means that they will know know exactly what was found (or not) and the fact that an airman has a know and located grave is no longer sufficient proof of his recovery for the purpose of issuing a permit…..As we found out when applying to recover DH Hornet F. Mk1 PX274, which crashed at Stacksteads near Bacup on 22.12.47.

    This of course means that many aircraft in your chosen area of interest, that would have been perfectly viable to consider excavating had they been wartime crashes, are likely to be denied to you when it comes to obtaining the required permit – Not that there is any evidence that those parts listed as un-recovered actually remain at the crash site – In all likelihood they were totally destoyed and certainly the post war recoveries tended to be more thorough in respect to human remains as well, but in our experience just as likely to consign useless smashed up equipment back into the hole!

    But the MOD now have “proof” that remains were not recovered and they seem to be reluctant (perhaps rightly? perhaps conveniently? depending on your view) to accept that those remains are unlikely to still be present and therefore under the terms of the 1986 Act, they will deny permission to excavate, unless, of course, you can put forward a valid reason why you should proceed! – Good Luck! 🙁 and Apologies for another “Negative” response!

    Hi Nick,

    I fully agree with you, however, the MOD dont allways clean up very well,
    even in later years, and certainly in the early 50s when air incidents were still quite common,
    I dont really look at anything post 1965 anyway bcause of that reason,
    I think it depends on the time of year of the crash , and how thorough the investigation, there is one near me (a sea hawk) that the pilot was involontarilly ejected, he survived with a broken ankle, they cleaned the mess up, but threw most of it into the 20ft crator, the old SWARG done a dig in the mid 80s when i was a nipper of Vampire UF300, and found loads, that had been thrown into a hole, and last year whilst visiting a friend , I visited a farm in the north east, where Vulcan XM610 crashed as late as 1971,
    it was late so we couldnt do anything but the farmer was still furious about the incident, he said he was never compensated enough for the brand new cow shed the vulcan had demolished, the MOD had left so much wreckage still in his field that he to this day still cannot use it, because parts kept damaging his machinery, they left a engine there, and its still there to this day, he walked us across the field , and you could see bits an pieces ,
    and as i went he gave me a turbine blade, he had a bucket of them which he had picked up over the years,,Up to a couple of years ago, he had a Huge pile of wreckage that he weighed in to the scrap man, the vulcan has caused him problems ever since it crashed ,
    so from first hand experiance i know the Mod dont allway act as thorough as they would like too, for what ever reason,
    I think since the 1970s things are VERY much different ,and they have proper investigations and enquiries,but i think “Pre” 1970s there was very little in the way of Recovery (sometimes) , and especailly when the aircraft has been abandoned before the crash, “or ” there is no Large ordnance that needs to be recovered,
    I hope this puts a positive side to (some) jet age recoveries,
    best regards
    Chris C
    Ex S.W.A.R.G,(defunked)
    now starting “CWARG” (hopefully)

    in reply to: Jet Age recovery Group and WH887 website #1171346
    merkle
    Participant

    name

    You have a few options for a group name, simply ‘Jet Aircraft Recovery Group’ works, by their very nature most Jets are post-war, ‘Post War Aircraft Recovery Group’ etc. First one is my fave and would probably most popular on Google

    Problem is , It will be predomanantly Jet, but lets not forget the Hornets,Lincolns,Mossie’s,Beaufighter target tugs,Baliol,Sea Furys,Tempests,
    the list is endless,so i wont be “Only ” looking at jets,but aircraft from that “Age”

    and at the end of the day when it costs you £300 + to recover a aircraft, it has to be Viable,Financailly, you cant just throw 300 and not get any valuable parts recovered,

    Put Simply if you dig up a Merlin engine, etc, i am sure the Value way out strips the Cost, But if it was a very smashed “Avon” it would be pretty much worthless, Now i would like to stress VERY Strongly, i am NOT doing this for
    money , But you cant keep spending that amount of money for no return, it is simple Math,

    So as you can see, It needs to be something to cover the whole period of
    1946 to 1975, and include Jet and Prop aircraft,

    🙂

    in reply to: Westonzoyland News #1171376
    merkle
    Participant

    Press,

    I would love to go to the press, but my hands are tied at the moment , and have been instructed “NOT” to go to the press yet, as infuriating this is, we will have to just “sit tight” and wait for the nod from the powers that be,who are higher up in the project, and land owners.

    in reply to: Jet Age recovery Group and WH887 website #1171381
    merkle
    Participant

    cockpits

    What are the cockpit sections behind the Canberra in the photographs ?
    Cheers.
    Ben.

    Hi Ben,
    the cockpits are VC10, huge great things,

    in reply to: Jet Age recovery Group and WH887 website #1171531
    merkle
    Participant

    “cold War Aircraft Recovery Group !!

    OK Guys, you win,
    i take your Valid points,

    to stop any confusion ,i will change it all tonight after work, if there s no objections, to naming it the C.W.A.R.G.

    incidentally is there any of you in the south west being remotely interested in this ??
    cheers
    Chris 🙂

    in reply to: Jet Age recovery Group and WH887 website #1171711
    merkle
    Participant

    I cant really call it anything else as the recoveries and investigations wil be of 50s to 70s jets
    of all types, the canberra is a seperate issue really .
    and “Post war” doesnt have a ring to it, i dont know what else it could be called to cover that period in time, it can hardly be called “space age” ,
    and the “Gas Turbine” age recovery group sounds really Naff,
    what else was i left with to cover the late 40s to the early 70s if not the jet age, i cant even call it “Cold war recovery group” a the late 40s were not in the cold war , ah its a headache,
    but please any ideas i would be pleased to hear them 🙂

    in reply to: Jet Age recovery Group and WH887 website #1171728
    merkle
    Participant

    Yes ive heard of the Jet age “Preservation” society, (staverton) and a real good bunch they are too, but I dont believe that theres a jet age “Recovery ” group in the UK, especailly specificaly dealing wth Post war Aviation Archaeology ??

    Correct me if i am wrong ??

    in reply to: Corsair at Fleet Air Arm Museum #1172472
    merkle
    Participant

    brewster corsair

    I think the Corsair that was dug up in Somerset last year (photos on Graham adlams exellent website spitfirespares.com )

    was a Brewster Built Corsair 😀

    in reply to: Mark I mustangs #1172521
    merkle
    Participant

    zoyland mustang

    Heres a good side plate diagram of Mustang AG431, she only served with 16sqn, and was at westonzoyland I believe,
    she was one of 320 delivered by North American between Nov 41 and May 42 to contract A-250,

    she was last used as a ground instructional airframe, being given the Number
    4225M on the 18th of october 1943.

    only from a Model box , but a nice ilistration all the same ,

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 960 total)