If it is a jacking hole it should have a plug to close it off just like on the “other” bomber. So would not be visible if not in use?
Cees

Hmm but when you read the testflights between Spitfire XIV’s and the Tempest (or other contemporary) fighters, the Tempest was fast, but not faster, had a
good roll rate and a better zoom-climb. Not bad for a mid 1930’s design (albeit developed beyond designers belief).
Cees

Each aircraft type needs a certain development time to achieve it’s full potential. The Spitfire and 109 were always close to each other regarding performance in
the first two years of the war. The first prototype 109 had noting more than 600+ hp.
You cannot compare certain types at a specific development process and apart from that the pilot is also a decisive factor.
But regarding the Mustang and Spitfire, I wonder how the Spitfire would have looked with a Mustang-type radiator housing. And the Mustang with the two
Spitfire underslung radiators. In the latter case there would be very much less room for fuel.
Anyone with photoshop skills?
Cees

Thanks Andy,
Very interesting.
Declaring it a monument to protect it? Now that really carries weight.
Isn’t it alrady protected under the pma-act?
Cees

Would be nice to see one day a recent Spitfire Mk 22 in flight photograph.
Cees

Late to the party I know, but what excellent news!
Well done IWM (better late than not).
Cees

Yes please, and Typhoon/Tempest/Sea Fury etc. The list goes on.
Cees

Not to mention the boo’s and the recent volume on the Hurricane. I really like these kind of books too.
Cees