Explain to me how a big, slow, VERY NOISY helicopter, with poor winching characteristics will ever be a better CSAR platform than a quiet, fast, agile helicopter that is proven in the role, and that is proven to be a good winching platform?
Don’t refer to spec points, plain simple explanation is all that is required.
Well there was a program that supercharged a chinook frame with 4 bladed rotors, retractable undercarriage, wings and a more powerful engine . Perhaps the HH-47 will be closer to this design when its finally built save the wings. The tests on this frame made this thing to be pretty nimble in the air btw

Ok, a little further snooping around turns up another shot out the opposite side of the aircraft…
links, show them being posted here: http://www.jadeair.com.tw/modules/ipboard/index.php?showtopic=8707
(sorry, couldn’t find it or tell you what anything says)and also in a non-public directory at this address:
(http://www.saguin.com/images/F16_Intercept_5.JPG)
(http://www.saguin.com/images/F16_Intercept_14.JPG)He’s in Washington State… anyone wanna just email him and ask where he got the shots? – unless of course that’s your address Prowlus 😉
Nope not my pic at all . Wonder if anyone on f-16.net have an idea
Weird probably the equivilent to sending a A-6 intruder to attack a su-24 fencer.
At least the Gladbags were fighters . Wonder if the US Navy considered an air defence role for its Helldivers since they had had adequate Armament compared to the SBD’s mediorce ones
If anything else I hope this pushes Britain and America to investigate appropriate IFF systems for vehicles.
Suprised they didn’t after what happened during gulf war 1 when an A-10 attacked 2 british army vehicles in a similar fashion killing 9 servicemen .
This is what happens when politicians start cutting armed forces budgets
Well, I am totally lost here! Many of the complainants about the F-35 replacing the venerable F-111 is….
1.) to expensive
2.) doesn’t have the range
3.) doesn’t have the range vs payload
4.) it isn’t a true fighter (i.e. bomb truck)
)
Because the F-35 is primarily replacing their older legacy hornets . The F-111 replacement idea was an afterthought . RAAF’s existing hornets are pretty much identical to what the F-35 is supposed to be toted as what the JSF was initially planned to replace in the furst place
Whoah that new fighter looks like a F-22 and Su-27’s love child
Didn’t the marines reject the Rhino when it was offered to them?
In the 80s, there were alot of good looking aircraft that would have made the grade of raptor/typhoon/jsf killers on the drawing board such as the IML Addax (the Aussie raptor), ALR Piranha etc but they were axed no thanks to US exports
too bad the Typhoon is also gunless along with stovl JSF the raf is thinking of ordering
So will there be a single seat version available now that they are gonna make it a proper fighter?
Didn’t GD offer a F-16xl variant for the atf competition too?
recent advances in Diecast aviation is probably partially to blame. Before the diecast revolution, there was only 3 ways of getting a nice detailed replica of a warbird in your living room: Option one was to buy a extortionate priced mahogany piece that had the most basic details sloppily painted on by sweatshop workers in a third world country. Option 2 was to spend enternity painting, glueing and priming a £6 to £40 model kit . Option 3 was to pay a stonking amount of money (£700 TO £1000) for a fully detailed resin model. Obviously 9/10 ppl chose option 2 . Then came Corgi with its reasonably priced detailed diecast aviation series and then suddenly enthusiasts had a 3rd option on their list and now companies such as Dragon, Witty Wings, Model Power, even Revell dominate the replica aviation market with detailed realistic diecast warbirds that don’t blow the bank balance or need “Some assembly required” .
Airfix should have adapted to the times and launched their own series of prepainted preassembled models to compete with Corgi’s line when the time was right . Its their own fault for not adapting to the times not even releasing a “Easy kit” range that revell did . The irony of this all is that Corgi actually used assembled airfix kits as testshots to higlight their aviation archive range in toyfairs
..More Tupolews with ‘friends’ 😉 ..but i still hunt for Tu-160 in ‘air meeting’ role
Is that A-4 armed with FFARS? How is it expecting to “kill” a badger with that?
Makes you wonder if they might aswell retain the demon for low cost interceptions
Makes you wonder why the RAF axed its Small Agile Battlefield Aircraft study . Something like that would be very useful nowadays
aswell . I say as a mark of honor, the upcomming Bond movie should be dedicated to the said pilot