dark light

Prowlus

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 137 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boeing HH-47 Chinook wins USAF CSAR-X! #2507756
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Explain to me how a big, slow, VERY NOISY helicopter, with poor winching characteristics will ever be a better CSAR platform than a quiet, fast, agile helicopter that is proven in the role, and that is proven to be a good winching platform?

    Don’t refer to spec points, plain simple explanation is all that is required.

    Well there was a program that supercharged a chinook frame with 4 bladed rotors, retractable undercarriage, wings and a more powerful engine . Perhaps the HH-47 will be closer to this design when its finally built save the wings. The tests on this frame made this thing to be pretty nimble in the air btw

    http://www.147thhillclimbers.org/347.jpg

    in reply to: Anyone know where this image came from? #2507797
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Ok, a little further snooping around turns up another shot out the opposite side of the aircraft…

    links, show them being posted here: http://www.jadeair.com.tw/modules/ipboard/index.php?showtopic=8707
    (sorry, couldn’t find it or tell you what anything says)

    and also in a non-public directory at this address:

    http://www.saguin.com

    (http://www.saguin.com/images/F16_Intercept_5.JPG)
    (http://www.saguin.com/images/F16_Intercept_14.JPG)

    He’s in Washington State… anyone wanna just email him and ask where he got the shots? – unless of course that’s your address Prowlus 😉

    Nope not my pic at all . Wonder if anyone on f-16.net have an idea

    in reply to: Douglas Dauntless, as a fighter?!! #1299419
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Weird probably the equivilent to sending a A-6 intruder to attack a su-24 fencer.
    At least the Gladbags were fighters . Wonder if the US Navy considered an air defence role for its Helldivers since they had had adequate Armament compared to the SBD’s mediorce ones

    in reply to: The Sun gets the A-10 blue-on-blue tape #2520845
    Prowlus
    Participant

    If anything else I hope this pushes Britain and America to investigate appropriate IFF systems for vehicles.

    Suprised they didn’t after what happened during gulf war 1 when an A-10 attacked 2 british army vehicles in a similar fashion killing 9 servicemen .
    This is what happens when politicians start cutting armed forces budgets

    in reply to: Australia to buy 24 F-18F's? #2545627
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Well, I am totally lost here! Many of the complainants about the F-35 replacing the venerable F-111 is….

    1.) to expensive
    2.) doesn’t have the range
    3.) doesn’t have the range vs payload
    4.) it isn’t a true fighter (i.e. bomb truck)
    )

    Because the F-35 is primarily replacing their older legacy hornets . The F-111 replacement idea was an afterthought . RAAF’s existing hornets are pretty much identical to what the F-35 is supposed to be toted as what the JSF was initially planned to replace in the furst place

    in reply to: Japanese Aerospace fading giant or reviving monster? #2516702
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Whoah that new fighter looks like a F-22 and Su-27’s love child

    in reply to: Great News for the F-22 #2521623
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Didn’t the marines reject the Rhino when it was offered to them?

    in reply to: Who may suprise us? #2524701
    Prowlus
    Participant

    In the 80s, there were alot of good looking aircraft that would have made the grade of raptor/typhoon/jsf killers on the drawing board such as the IML Addax (the Aussie raptor), ALR Piranha etc but they were axed no thanks to US exports

    in reply to: Harrier GR-7/9 lack of gunpod #2559505
    Prowlus
    Participant

    too bad the Typhoon is also gunless along with stovl JSF the raf is thinking of ordering

    in reply to: KAI A-50 to become 'FA-50' with AESA radar and datalink #2562305
    Prowlus
    Participant

    So will there be a single seat version available now that they are gonna make it a proper fighter?

    in reply to: F-16XL VS F-15E!? #2567283
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Didn’t GD offer a F-16xl variant for the atf competition too?

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1311117
    Prowlus
    Participant

    recent advances in Diecast aviation is probably partially to blame. Before the diecast revolution, there was only 3 ways of getting a nice detailed replica of a warbird in your living room: Option one was to buy a extortionate priced mahogany piece that had the most basic details sloppily painted on by sweatshop workers in a third world country. Option 2 was to spend enternity painting, glueing and priming a £6 to £40 model kit . Option 3 was to pay a stonking amount of money (£700 TO £1000) for a fully detailed resin model. Obviously 9/10 ppl chose option 2 . Then came Corgi with its reasonably priced detailed diecast aviation series and then suddenly enthusiasts had a 3rd option on their list and now companies such as Dragon, Witty Wings, Model Power, even Revell dominate the replica aviation market with detailed realistic diecast warbirds that don’t blow the bank balance or need “Some assembly required” .
    Airfix should have adapted to the times and launched their own series of prepainted preassembled models to compete with Corgi’s line when the time was right . Its their own fault for not adapting to the times not even releasing a “Easy kit” range that revell did . The irony of this all is that Corgi actually used assembled airfix kits as testshots to higlight their aviation archive range in toyfairs

    in reply to: Show us those interception pictures! #2557032
    Prowlus
    Participant

    ..More Tupolews with ‘friends’ 😉 ..but i still hunt for Tu-160 in ‘air meeting’ role

    Is that A-4 armed with FFARS? How is it expecting to “kill” a badger with that?
    Makes you wonder if they might aswell retain the demon for low cost interceptions

    in reply to: Brits short of airpower in Afghanistan #2572190
    Prowlus
    Participant

    Makes you wonder why the RAF axed its Small Agile Battlefield Aircraft study . Something like that would be very useful nowadays

    in reply to: Pilot killed in jet crash at Ottawa air show #400856
    Prowlus
    Participant

    aswell . I say as a mark of honor, the upcomming Bond movie should be dedicated to the said pilot

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 137 total)