If Hawkeye can’t operate off her (can it?) I don’t believe any other fixed wing could. Are there any other FW carrier AEW aircraft out there? I think the Indian Navy will have to stick with helicopters unless the US finally decides to field an Osprey based system.
The E-2C Hawkeye had demonstrated an ability to launch from a low incline ski-jump built ashore at NAS Patuxent River during the 1980s. In 2004 and early 2005 Northrop Grumman did further research on a ski-jumping Hawkeye 2000 in the context of a proposal to the Indian Navy, and while insisting that this was perfectly feasible had to admit that the required changes for STOBAR operations would reduce the aircraft’s capabilities somewhat compared to the standard model.
Apparently, generating antigravity.
They dont build em like this no mo’
Not since 1978.
The contract requires all steel plating to be cut to 5’x5′ – which greatly reduces its resale value over what they could get for 8’x4′ plates.
All Star Metals won’t be making a lot of profit on this, all things considered.
Yeah I actually took a class on Germany a few terms ago for my Masters degree, and indeed just about everything in the East was state run.
Anything else would be (gasp, shock, horror!) capitalism… which would be unthinkable for a modern Marxist-Leninist state.
what is with the UK wanting to retain old equipment, but retiring all they’re newest toys (AH-64D, Sentinel,….)
to me, even looking at the RC-135 buy doenst make sence, why replace the nimrod R.1 with a machine thats just as old (or even older).
would have been cheaper or more future-certian to buy a 737-based derivative. but thats another topic….
Ah, yes… you claim that buying a P-8 Poseidon ASW aircraft, stripping out most of its mission systems and installing & integrating (getting to work in the different airframe) the old Nimrod R.1 mission system, and re-certifying the 3 airframes for airworthiness would have been cheaper than just buying 3 KC-135s with fully-known & fully-documented service & maintenance records and newly-refurbishing them into RC-135W SIGINT aircraft with a USAF-standard mission system installation identical to that in over a dozen USAF RC-135Ws?
Apparently you missed that the P-8 and the EC-135 have completely different mission and mission systems (radars, electronic receivers/processors, etc).
ASW = anti-submarine warfare
SIGINT = signals intelligence
$4.8Bn for 24x AH-64E Apaches including weapons, support, training.
The “weapons, support, training” part of these contracts is always significantly more of the cost than the “aircraft” part… so the price is well below $100million per AH-64.
Now they do.
Here is an interesting commentary, in which it is stated that the US Army since 2002 has retrofitted its Apaches with the folding-rotor head developed for the WAH-64D: http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.com/2011/06/apache-ah1.html
The UK’s Apaches, WAH64D Apache AH Mk1 or simply AH1, did thus receive some very substantial changes from their American counterpart. One major difference for the WAH-64 is the folding blade mechanism to stow the helicopters in confined spaces and for operations at sea; the rotor blades also have anti-ice protection to allow operations in arctic environments. Interestingly, the US Army looked at this idea with interest: their focus was less on Ship-capability, and more on ease and rapidity of air transportation of Apache into theatre, but the end result has been the same, since their November 2002 requirement was met with folding blades. The folding blades allows the main rotor to be folded along the aircraft’s length without being removed. The solution also provides for storage of the Apache Longbow’s radar dome on the aircraft aft of the rotor hub for transport.
A single C-5 aircraft can now carry six Apaches, their flight crews, reassembly technicians and their tools. In the past, a second aircraft was needed to haul in special reassembly equipment, and additional personnel, and only 5 Apaches were carried. The blades had to be removed and stored along with the radar apart from the aircraft, taking up space in the cargo airplane and requiring more time to reassemble at the Apaches’ destination. Folding blades remove the need for a test flight, necessary after a disassembly/reassemply op, and significantly reduces the logistics load required to deploy.
A C17 can carry 3 Apaches, while without folding blades that would be 2.
The aircraft, a P-40E model, is the kind flown by the 1st American Volunteer Group formed in China by Gen. Claire Chennault shortly before the United States entered the war.
I wish museums would do their research… the AVG never actually saw combat before 7 December 1941.
The AVG had its first combat on 20 December 1941, when aircraft of the 1st and 2nd squadrons intercepted 10 unescorted Kawasaki Ki-48 “Lily” bombers of the 21st Hikotai raiding Kunming.
The AVG only flew P-40Es from April 1942 on… they had only Tomahawk IIBs (diverted from RAF deliveries) and P-40Bs before that (and continued to use the older birds until they were unrepairable).
For a quick moderately accurate overview, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniature_UAV
A miniature UAV or Small UAV (SUAV), is an unmanned aerial vehicle small enough to be man-portable.
Miniature UAVs range from micro air vehicles (MAVs) that can be carried by an infantryman, to man-portable UAVs that can be carried and launched like an infantry anti-aircraft missile.
Here are a couple of documents about using radar aboard MAVs:
http://www.ssrrc.dtc.umn.edu/docs/RadarBasedDetection.pdf Radar-Based Detection and Identification for Miniature Air Vehicles
http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/19/59/33/PDF/fsr_53.pdf Reactive Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles using Doppler Radar
Hasn’t the A-10 been made obsolete by modern guided weapons technology?
Regards
No, the upgrade of the A-10/OA-10s to the A-10C included the following: http://defense-update.com/products/a/a10c.htm
A-10C Warthog – Receives Modifications for Precision Engagement
A-10s are currently operated by US Air Force Reserve and Air National Guards. Some of the aircraft are being upgraded into the new A-10C, and all aircraft to remain in service will receive new wing sets within the next 10 years. Boeing was awarded a contract worth up to US$1 billion to design and build the new wings. As a near-term update, the aircraft are equipped with Improved Data Modem (IDM) to link to and support ground elements by establishing direct data connectivity with Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC), enhancing the standard, lengthy and inaccurate ‘talk through’ process.
The A-10 Prime Team led by Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) has received a $48 million award from the U.S. Air Force to produce 107 Precision Engagement (PE) modification kits for the Under the Precision Engagement (PE) upgrading program, the A-10 close air support fighter is modified into the A-10C.
From a clear weather, visual only attack aircraft the A-10C is transformed into an all-weather, multi-mission precision weapons delivery platform, capable of employing the Joint Direct Attack Munition and the Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser. The program is integrating advanced sensors, a datalink and the LITENING AT and Sniper XR targeting pods onto the aircraft, which will boost pilot situational awareness, targeting capabilities, survivability and communication with other coalition ground and air elements.
Comprising hardware and software upgrades, each installed kit transforms the legacy A-10A aircraft enabling precision weapons capability. Each PE kit consists of a new cockpit instrument panel with two 5×5 inch multi-function color displays, a new stick grip and right throttle to provide true hands-on-throttle and-stick fingertip control of aircraft systems and targeting pod functionality, and six pylons upgraded to ‘smart’ weapons capability. A new computer called the Central Interface Control Unit manages the avionics and the integrated Digital Stores Management System (DSMS), which controls weapons functionality.
Lockheed Martin is expected to deliver a total of 356 kits over five years for an estimated $168 million. Kit production will run to 2008 with kit installation scheduled to go to 2009. To date, 21 aircraft have been modified at Ogden Air Logistics Center at Hill Air Force Base, Utah; 356 total aircraft are to receive the upgrades, constituting the entire fleet, including active duty, Reserve and Air National Guard. Flight testing of the A-10C aircraft’s DSMS and digital map is taking place at Eglin Air Force Base, FL, and at Nellis Air Force Base, NV. Maryland Air National Guard 175th Wing at Warfield Air National Guard Base in Baltimore will be the first unit to convert to the modified aircraft.
As A-10 prime contractor and systems integrator under the direction of the Air Force A-10 program office (508th Aircraft Sustainment Squadron), Lockheed Martin Systems Integration – Owego leads a team composed of BAE Systems, Johnson City, NY; Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX; and Northrop Grumman, St. Augustine, FL.
http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2008/June%202008/0608fade.aspx
Also included is the Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receiver (ROVER) to provide sensor data to personnel on the ground.
…..
One of the last weapons equipped on the A-10Cs just prior to their deployment was the laser Maverick air-to-ground missile—the AGM-65E—which until last year was used primarily by the Navy and Marine Corps.
The Air Force Material Command’s Ogden Air Logistics Center at Hill AFB, Utah completed work on its 100th A-10 precision engagement upgrade in January 2008. At that time the program was expected to upgrade 356 A-10s to A-10C configuration
In July 2010, the USAF issued Raytheon a contract to integrate a Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting (HMIT) system into A-10Cs.
Despite the obvious limitations, I would have thought the survivability of an A-10 in a hostile combat zone, would by far
exceed that of any combat helicopter. For that reason alone I believe it should stay in service for as long as possible.
And the new systems and weapons ensure both minimum-time weapon-delivery runs and allow weapons to be deployed from higher altitudes, outside range of Manpads and light/medium AA guns.
Not the USMC… not just for political reasons, but because the USMC is keeping its AV-8Bs in service until “up to 2030″… which means removable parts and even airframe components are/will be stripped from the unflyable/life-expired airframes to keep the rest flying (that was the reason behind the USMC buying all 74 GR7/9s and the entire spare parts stock for them from the RAF.
This means that the USMC will replace its F/A-18s with F-35s first, and then its AV-8Bs.
So, no flyable AV-8Bs for a long time, if ever.
Since you didn’t bother with translating for us, we have to machine-translate what you quoted (and thus get a crappy quess as to meaning):
Is in progress the adoption of the Program of Obtaining Navios-Aerodromos , the PRONAE, which provides for the replacement of the NAe “Sao Paulo” until 2028, which will be achieved with the construction of a Navio-Aerodromo with approximately 50,000 tons of displacement, endowed with catapult for launching of aircraft and equipment downtime for your recollection;
The long-term, Brazil intends to acquire two aircraft carrier of 50,000 tonnes, in the context of the program PRONAE. It seems that were consulted the Navantia, Fincantieri, DCNS, BAE Systems and Gibbs & Cox, in order to obtain information about this project.
Back when the F-16 was just a simple day fighter
So was the F/A-18 for that matter…(to be honest I don’t know that I ever knew they painted one of the YF-17’s with the words “F/A-18 prototype”)
Ah, yes… the F-18 Hornet (replacement for the F-4), and not to be confused with the A-18 (the replacement for the A-7), which had a different avionics suite in the same airframe.
Then came the day when McD and the USN realized avionics had gotten so small/light, and so versitile, that one set of avionics that could do everything could be fitted into one airframe – and so was born the F/A-18.
And actually, the F-18 was not just a “day fighter”… from the start the AN/APG-65 was an all-weather BVR-capable radar and the F-18 was intended to carry Sparrow missiles. The F-16 had to wait for the “C” model before it got Sparrow capability.
I had to do some googling to learn what you were talking about.
That thing looks bulkier than a chest parachute!