dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: biplane #1003281
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Might help if the photo was big enough to see anything.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2032977
    Bager1968
    Participant

    China starts building second aircraft carrier: media

    That article gives a much more reasonable timeline than many had given (“3 new carriers to be built and in service in 4 years” and similar crap):

    Beijing (AFP) – China has started constructing the second of four planned aircraft carriers, a top government official said according to media reports on Saturday.

    The ship is under construction in the northeastern port of Dalian and will take six years to build, the reports said quoting Wang Min, Communist Party chief for Dalian’s Liaoning province.

    in reply to: Red Arrows Ejection death #2267172
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Read
    http://www.pprune.org/military-aircrew/531572-flt-lt-sean-cunningham-inquest.html

    Which I linked to and recommended back in post #32.

    in reply to: Douglas B-18 w/heavy gun installed? #1004829
    Bager1968
    Participant

    75-MM GUN M4 AND AIRPLANE MOUNT M6 TM9_1311_1943.pdf

    M4
    The 75-mm aircraft gun M4 is a modification of the M3 gun which is found in medium tanks. It differs from the M3 gun, only in having a seat for the spline machined in the tube. It was mounted on the M6 mount.

    T13E1 / M5
    A lightweight version of the M3 with a lighter thin-walled barrel and a different recoil mechanism that was used in the B-25H Mitchell bomber. Uses the same ammunition and has the same ballistics as the M3. Mounted on T13E2 aircraft mount.

    The M4 gun assembly weighed 893 lb according to the PDF above, and the gun tube weighed 628 lb… I can’t find the weight of the T13E1.

    Can anyone find this: TM9-312 75mm Gun T13E1 and Aircraft Mount T13E2?

    in reply to: Old Magazine quiz. #1005733
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Is that a Sunderland tail turret?

    in reply to: Super Hornet down off Virginia #2213688
    Bager1968
    Participant

    In critical condition, however.
    http://www.10news.com/news/u-s-world/navy-says-fa-18-jet-crashes-in-atlantic-ocean-off-virginia-011514

    Posted: 01/15/2014
    Last Updated: 1 day ago

    NORFOLK, Va. – A Navy fighter jet crashed Wednesday in Atlantic waters off Virginia and the lone pilot was in critical condition after he ejected and was rescued, the Navy said.

    …..

    Cmdr. Mike Kafka, a spokesman for Naval Air Forces Atlantic, said the single-seat F/A-18E Super Hornet crashed at 2:35 p.m. about 45 miles off Virginia Beach.

    The pilot ejected and a life raft deployed, according to a Navy statement. The pilot was initially recovered by a fishing vessel and then picked up by a Navy MH-60 Sea Hawk helicopter and flown to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital. The hospital is the area’s only Level I Trauma Center.

    Kafka said the pilot was conscious while being flown to the hospital, but he gave no other details about the crash or why he was in critical condition. The pilot’s name hasn’t been released.

    The jet was among two on the training mission, and the pilot of the other plane helped pinpoint the downed pilot’s location. It wasn’t immediately clear how the fishing vessel found the pilot, but Kafka said it arrived within ten minutes of the crash.

    The jet was based at Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach and belonged to Strike Fighter Squadron 143. The squadron is part of Carrier Air Wing Seven, which returned to Virginia last summer following a deployment aboard USS Dwight D. Eisenhower to Europe and the Middle East.

    With the crash at 2:35 in the afternoon, and the fishing boat arriving 10 minutes later, I’d saw the boat’s crew saw the crash.

    in reply to: DC3-T Ice rescue #1007076
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Consider the cost of the recovery vs the purchase cost of a replacement aircraft.

    As this was owned by a commercial operation that would be the determining factor.

    in reply to: Info required on an old photograph #1007081
    Bager1968
    Participant

    This site positively identifies the aircraft, noting that the name “City of New York” was painted on the side, and providing photos of this:
    http://www.dmairfield.com/airplanes/NX5501/index.html
    The text notes

    The annotation on the original photograph states, ” Fairchild FC-2W, P&W R-1340 “Wasp” 410HP, NX5501 c/n 86, ‘The City of New York’, John Mears and Charles Collyer’s, ‘Round-the-World’ in 23 days, 15 hours at Bettis Field 7/21/28.”

    The article also notes that it was actually a FC-2W2, not a -2W (the -2W2 had a 2-foot fuselage extension which is noted as being discernible in the photo).

    The guy in the light-colored suit looks a lot like Moggy C!

    in reply to: Info required on an old photograph #1007084
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Wiley Post’s two “round-the-world” flights were both in Winnie Mae, the first in 1931 with Harold Gatty as navigator and the second in 1933 with no one else in the aircraft at all, becoming the first to circumnavigate the world “solo”.

    in reply to: New Bell 47 Book #1008011
    Bager1968
    Participant

    With some 5,600 built between 1946 and 1974, that would be a large part of a book by itself!

    in reply to: Low Frying DC-10 Restaurant #1008015
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Then there is THIS at the Colorado Springs Airport in Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA (note that the port wing and both engines are inside the building. See the link for photos of tables inside under the wing!). T took the first 2 photographs on 18 June 2013:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224572[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]224573[/ATTACH]

    This is my favorite photo from that website:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224574[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Origins Of The Use Of Aircraft As Gate Guardians #1009119
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I think that has has been pointed out above it only became practical with the advent of all-metal airframes.

    Moggy

    Then a Junkers CL.1 (J.8)? Or many other Junkers designs of 1914-1918*?

    * J.1 of 1915, J.2 of 1916, J.4 of 1917, D.1 (J.9) of 1917, etc.

    in reply to: Red Arrows Ejection death #2214541
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Never heard of a seat just firing on its own. That would be the rarest of freak accidents. I have heard of seats being inadvertently fired, as in some action by someone in the jet caused the seat to fire, un-intentionally. I don’t know the specifics of this seat, but it certainly either had a safety pin, an arm/safe handle, or both. If it only has a pin (as in some current western seats installed in the T-6), then if that pin is removed the seat could theoretically be fired by accidentally pulling or getting entangled on the handle. If it requires both a removed pin and also arming the seat manually (as in the seat I fly on every day), then it would take a little more idiocy to accidentally fire……..yet still possible if the seat were, unbeknownst to the sitter, actually armed with the pin removed.

    As an aside, 0/0 seats aren’t 0/0 all the time. Surface winds can render them not 0/0, and aircraft attitude can also render them not 0/0. If you are inverted at 100′, the outcome is going to be predictably not survivable. And as a third possibility, malfunction of the seat or parachute themselves, while not common, are still possible.

    Here is an account of exactly a “self-firing seat malfunction”, with specifics and a technical analysis of what happened:
    http://www.gallagher.com/ejection_seat/

    Here is a (more civil and professional) discussion on another board – many of the posters are ex-UK military aviation, and a number of those knew each other during their service so there is no chance of Fedaykin’s fantasy claim of false credentials:

    http://www.pprune.org/military-aircrew/469757-reports-red-arrows-flt-lt-cunninghams-death.html

    It is absolutely established that the seat did NOT separate as it was designed to do, and the chute did NOT deploy as it was designed to – and that BOTH of those ARE malfunctions, NOT the result of any temporary conditions.

    in reply to: NATO's tactical combat plane inventories in 1989. #2214558
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Um… in 1989 the only A-3s in US use were one Naval Reserve KA-3B tanker squadron (VAK-308) which retired the type in 1989, and two Navy ERA-3B electronic aggressor squadrons (VAQ-33 & VAQ-34) which retired their aircraft in February & September 1991. These two were used for training of other squadrons, not in an offensive combat role.

    in reply to: Aussie Corsair Soon To Fly #1009940
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The first production F4U Corsairs were built during 1942, the AU-1 ground-attack variant for the USMC were built during the Korean War, and the last Corsairs built were the F4U-7s for the French Navy, built during 1952.

    However, this 1947-built one is an F4U-5 (due to the “cheek” oil-cooler inlets), and thus is fully a “POST-WW2” bird, as all of this variant were built after the end of the war.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 3,360 total)