dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B17 "CAN DO", was it real? #1038738
    Bager1968
    Participant

    http://bomberflight.info/links_pages/links_8th_air_force_bomb_groups.htm

    Group _____ Moto or Sobriquet _____ Association Web Site
    305th BG _____ “Can Do” _________ 305th Bomb Group Memorial Association [ B-17 ]

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2295533
    Bager1968
    Participant

    BTW Spud – The reason that the A-10 is getting cut is that the USAF had more A-10s than it (or even the Army) needed. Even post-cut, the A-10 fleet – dedicated to CAS – is bigger than most of the world’s fighter forces.

    The USAF has wished to remove the A-10 from it’s inventory for a long time.
    This is not due to effectiveness or otherwise but due to USAF leadership inclination towards fast air.
    To present the intended withdrawal of the A-10 from the inventory as proof that the CAS role as performed by the A-10 as completely outdated is a spurious conclusion.

    There are currently 12 A-10 combat squadrons, 3 A-10 training squadrons, and 2 weapons development/test A-10 squadrons.

    The proposed 2013 DOD budget calls for “decommissioning or re-aligning” 5 A-10 squadrons.

    5 out of 17… and some may be combined or reorganized, not eliminated.

    in reply to: UK back in for the F35B? #2295534
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well its working for the Australians in respect of their Super Hornet and I would think the French would jump at the chance to shift some Rafale M even after the mega Indian deal…so I would argue that something could always be worked out Badger.

    The RAAF purchased theirs outright, at full price.
    They also intend to keep them until the end of their F-35A purchase… and perhaps beyond.

    This is very different from a short-term RN lease until deliveries of F-35C can begin.

    Not necessarily. The MN commanded about 60 Rafale M because they expected to operate at term at least 2 aircraft carrier.With the plan for the second aircraft carrier falling through, they may be more than willing to “lease” a few to the RN.

    The first 10 Rafale-M are F-1 standard, and are not operationally deployed.

    -M #33 was delivered in late 2011, and on Jan. 10 2012 #34 was still at the factory. Contracts to date were to bring the total to 48 (16 F2, updated after delivery to F-3; and 22 F-3), with options for bringing an undetermined number of the 10 F-1s up to F-3 standard.

    If you move fast maybe you can lease those 10.

    At least one -M has been lost to a crash, and the future of #49-#60 is in doubt, as orders for them have not yet been placed.

    Interim solutions have a way of becoming permanent, and the UK cannot pull out of the F-35 program, that would make the plane more expansive for the other nations that may follow the lead of Australia and RN into looking at alternative etc. The US won’t allow it. So it’s more likely the RN will get between 3 or 6 early production model F-35C/B in 2020 and will have to wait until later for anything else.

    Indeed… and a lease of Rafale or Super Hornet is very likely to be permanent.

    in reply to: UK back in for the F35B? #2295571
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Finally a short term lease of Rafale M or Super Hornet to bridge the gap until F35C, this has the added advantage of bringing down the upfront costs by inducting a mature type that UK pilots have already flown and allows time for the risk to be taken out of the F35C program.

    Since either would require new aircraft to be built just for the “lease”, expect to pay full price for those aircraft, with no guarantee that the MN or USN would buy them back… which would mean that the RN will be stuck with them instead of F-35C for several decades.

    in reply to: USAAF in Burma WW2 photos #1042050
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Website Currently Unavailable

    The website you are trying to access is currently unavailable. Please try again at a later time.

    If you are the site owner, review the following resource to help resolve the issue.

    .

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2025046
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Its a modification to the production contract for DDG-115, adding DDG-116.
    Its not a modification to any contract for DDG-116.

    Final cost depends on inflation, any delays experienced, any labor cost increases from union contract re-negotiations, and all that other stuff that cannot be forseen at the time the contract is actually issued.

    Here are the contracts for the “extra” DDGs… note that LLTM stands for “Long Lead Time Material”… things that have to be ordered well in advance of beginning actual construction.

    The lack of any LLTM entry for DDG-116 is interesting.

    N00024-10-C-2308 – HII Ingalls
    2-Dec-09 ____ DDG 113 ___ LLTM ___ FY10 ___ 170,700,000
    23-Apr-10 ___ DDG 114 ___ LLTM ___ FY10 ___ 114,003,000
    2-Jun-11 ____ DDG 113 ___ LLTM ___ FY11 ___ 25,300,000

    N00024-10-C-2311 – GD Bath Iron Works
    26-Feb-10 ___ DDG 115 ___ LLTM ___ FY10 ___ 114,003,000

    N00024-11-C-2309 – HII Ingalls
    15-Jun-11 ___ DDG 113 ___ FY11 ___ 783,572,487
    26-Sep-11 ___ DDG 114 ___ FY11 ___ 697,629,899

    N00024-11-C-2305 – GD Bath Iron Works
    26-Sep-11 ___ DDG 115 ___ FY11 ___ 679,600,348
    28-Feb-12 ___ DDG 116 ___ FY11 ___ 662,927,172

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2025091
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine, is being awarded a $662,927,172 modification to previously awarded contract (N00024-11-C-2305) to exercise options for DDG 116 construction and associated engineering change proposals and design budgeting requirements.

    N00024-11-C-2305 – GD Bath Iron Works
    26-Sep-11 ___ DDG 115 ___ FY11 ___ 679,600,348

    http://shipbuildinghistory.com/today/statistics/navycontracts.htm

    This contract adds DDG-116 to the build schedule, making it the 4th Burke-class DDG ordered due to the cut-back of the DDG-1000 program.

    in reply to: Australian sea 1000 project #2025366
    Bager1968
    Participant

    You’re wasting your breath, Swerve.

    Wanshan and others like him have long ago programmed themselves with a certain view of what they think is reality, then locked it closed to prevent ever changing it.

    You can provide all the proof you want, they refuse to accept that their view is not correct.

    I’ve posted the same links to the Japanese constitution, etc repeatedly, on multiple fora, myself… so I understand.

    in reply to: Unidentified "black box" #1049315
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I was just going by the only item he provided a close-up of… which would indicate that this was what he wanted identified.

    in reply to: Unidentified "black box" #1049993
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The paper attached to the right if the item says “waveform generator type (C-O?) MkIII” plus more illegible words.

    The labels on the knobs confirm this… this is a piece of test equipment designed to generate signals where the operator varies pulse width, amplitude, voltage, delay between pulses etc.

    If it is American, test equipment is normally that shade of grey.

    It would be used in testing & repairing malfunctioning electronics… such as wireless sets..

    Bager1968
    Participant

    R-1830 was first run in 1932

    R-2000 production numbers for 1941 are 9 engines, 1 in July and 8 in December. For 1942 406 engines are produced followed by 1449 in 1943 and 3164 in 1944.

    Specifications (R-1830-S1C-G)
    General characteristics

    * Type: Fourteen-cylinder two-row supercharged air-cooled radial engine
    * Bore: 5.5 in (139.7 mm)
    * Stroke: 5.5 in (139.7 mm)
    * Displacement: 1,829.4 in³ (30 l)
    * Length: 59.06 in (1,500 mm)
    * Diameter: 48.03 in (1,220 mm)
    * Dry weight: 1,250 lb (567 kg)

    Specifications (R-2000-3)
    General characteristics

    * Type: Twin-row radial engine, 14 cylinder
    * Bore: 5.75 in (146 mm)
    * Stroke: 5.5 in (139.7 mm)
    * Displacement: 2,004 cu in (32.8 L)
    * Length: 61.02″ (1550 mm)
    * Diameter: 49.49″ (1257 mm)
    * Dry weight: 1,570 lb (713.6 kg)

    in reply to: Dassault, BAE To Work On Unmanned Fighter Jet Project #2318923
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Who’s talking about small change like airplanes? You made a slight about other European countries being late to deliver etc. Spain is synonymous across Europe, much like Greece, as an example of poor working practices. Maybe the RAF would be able to afford lots of nice new airplanes if the government wasn’t having to cut the armed forces budget, not to reduce its overall spending, but to provide budget increases and loans to Europe…

    So, basically we are a country with poor working practices that can keep his word and buy all the planes we signed. And now even is our fault the huge debt of the UK. We are the devil…

    How does Norway feel about its 5 new Spanish-built Aegis frigates?

    And how’s that contract with Australia for 2 Juan Carlos I clones coming?

    I don’t seem to have heard much about cost over-runs, poor quality, or late delivery for them.

    In fact, it seems that the Spanish worked their &sses off, and delivered quality products on time and at a fair price.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2318976
    Bager1968
    Participant

    It’s easy to imagine a country being allowed to buy F-16s, but not allowed a US AESA radar either for new aircraft or upgrades.

    Yes, that’s easy. But that country will never get an AESA, even a non-US made one… apart from situation when they decide to integrate them by themselves somehow, which requires tremendous domestic supporting infrastructure is beyond doubt. See the case of Iranian F-14s for comparison.

    Taiwan bought F-16s in the early 1990s (the US was trying to kill the F-CK-1 program), and continue to be able to buy all needed repair parts.

    However, when they tried to get an upgrade contract, the US blocked them.

    A 3rd-party upgrade might work… but the US might cut off the parts chain.

    in reply to: Dassault, BAE To Work On Unmanned Fighter Jet Project #2322118
    Bager1968
    Participant

    At least the UK will have a proper stealth fighter if they do this, unlike that god-awful F-35 contraption.

    Let’s hope my friend let’s hope…

    Not at the price cited in the article!

    The project will have an investment of a few tens of millions of euros, according to the report. The new stealth jet would eventually replace both the Rafale and Eurofighter, Les Echos said.

    For the cost of one Rafale or Typhoon they are going to develop a replacement?

    Really?

    in reply to: Mystery UK forces mobilisation today 2/2/12? #2322291
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Any way, i couldn’t read all of this, what is a “false flag”?

    A classic example of a “false flag” operation is the “attack” by “Polish soldiers” on a German radio station in September.

    The “Polish soldiers” were actually German soldiers who entered Poland wearing Polish uniforms, and then attacked the German radio station.

    There were 20 other such staged incidents, all of which were used by Hitler as justification for invading Poland.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 3,360 total)