dark light

hopefully1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 67 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Most embarrasing thing you have ever done…! #1947942
    hopefully1
    Participant

    In my single days I tried to impress a rather attractive young lady at the bus stop opposite my folks home . On leaving the house in the morning I noticed a flat tyre on the car ,so taking the opportunity to show of my mechanical prowess I proceeded to execute a rapid formula 1 style wheel change swiftly followed by an equally rapid reversing of the car into the gate post.

    in reply to: Things spotters (don't) do #410732
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Just a little tip.

    The guy who says “I’ll take a free flight” is likely to be a long way in the queue behind the guy who says “I can’t afford a formal cost share but I’m sure I could find the price of a landing fee, or an all-day breakfast.”

    Rob P

    Buying lunch or paying the landing fee should go without saying, I would still consider it a free flight.I suppose it was the way i was brought up “one good deed deserves another.” Thanks for the advice though i’ll change the wording of my replies in future.

    in reply to: Things spotters (don't) do #411018
    hopefully1
    Participant

    I’LL TAKE A FREE FLIGHT IN THE MIDLANDS AREA IF ANYONE IS OFFERING.Although I’m not a spotter / enthusiast I just can’t afford my ppl yet.

    hopefully1
    Participant

    get a pucara captured in the Falklands flying ,English Electric Lightning,Folland Gnat,as many polikarpovs as possible.Definitely have a few more pitts specials maybe even a tribute to the man himself with a number of his different creations flying a formation.Good toilets ,no queues in or out and good cheap catering vans.

    in reply to: Does my bum look big in this ? #1953434
    hopefully1
    Participant

    lets have a CRACK at getting it going again

    in reply to: General Discussion #371620
    hopefully1
    Participant

    lets have a CRACK at getting it going again

    in reply to: General Discussion #328140
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Thanks ,seems blindingly obvious to me . Must be some reason it’s not been done . Any ideas why?

    in reply to: What Would YOU Do In A Terrorist Attack #1923999
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Thanks ,seems blindingly obvious to me . Must be some reason it’s not been done . Any ideas why?

    in reply to: General Discussion #329055
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Would it be too much to ask for a big red panic button to be fitted in the cockpit.At the first sign of trouble the pilot hits the thing and the plane then flies on autopilot to the nearest suitable airfield and lands without human intervention.This at least frees up two more people to fight the cause,and,in the event of the pilots being killed the plane still lands saftely.

    in reply to: What Would YOU Do In A Terrorist Attack #1924460
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Would it be too much to ask for a big red panic button to be fitted in the cockpit.At the first sign of trouble the pilot hits the thing and the plane then flies on autopilot to the nearest suitable airfield and lands without human intervention.This at least frees up two more people to fight the cause,and,in the event of the pilots being killed the plane still lands saftely.

    in reply to: Fan trainer from the mid eighties #1376267
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Thankyou all, this was the plane, now to start googling. Does anyone know, was this plane purely military or was it also ment for the civilian market.If so are any still flying?
    As for the optica (sorry I knew of that one I should have said.)are any of these still flying or is it still in prodction anywhere?

    in reply to: air taxi, is it feasable? #606510
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Please accept my apologies SCHORSCH.
    Make no mistake about my idea ,it is just that,an idea that stays in my head whilst trying to get through a night shift.i’ve said before that i agree with you about regulation I’m also with you on the industry being a little conservative. It’s good to know i’m not alone.
    As a foot note i don’t imagine these ports as being official airports as such just ports of call for the use solely of the operater keeping the number of aircraft movements to a minimum.May be i’m anticipating the problems of legislation.
    To chornedsnorkack. From what i’ve seen of helicopter operations and a few flights in helicopters they rarely take off vertically to operating height.They gain speed in forward flight before gaining any significant height .With this in mind autogyros and VSTOL jets should be capable of using current larger heliports.

    in reply to: air taxi, is it feasable? #607756
    hopefully1
    Participant

    Hi Schorch, in response to your comments questioning the demand for such a service. Read the thread titled “Problems with Copterline”.up to 1200 passengers a week sounds like demand to me,and thats for expensive helicopters.Anyhow, have fun with my proposed service,expand ,develope or ridicule it as you see fit.

    in reply to: air taxi, is it feasable? #607765
    hopefully1
    Participant

    OK here’s an idea for you to get your teeth into. We can forget the idea of a taxi service but maybe operate a shuttle service between major cities.To eliminate the major stumbling block of current shuttle services we will not operate from airports and remove check in by operating first come first serve system.Whichever vehicle is chosen it should be ,say ,a 12 seater be it VTOL jet ,tiltrotor or autogyro.The service would operate a circular route calling at all the cities in the loop.This circuit will operate clockwise and anticlockwise,and having no more than two craft at any port of call at any one time,thus cutting down on the required space.
    Now it starts to get a little optermistic.The ports would be based at major retail parks in each city .They will operate from the roofs of major retail outlets who retail out of large warehouse style buildings.This hopefully cuts the cost of land by sharing it with a third party.Obviously these buildings would have to be specifically built but it’s not inconcievable.This now splits the cost of the operation between three parties ,the operator(be it a recognised aircraft carrier or a large coach operator),the retail chain,and the aircraft manufacturer(obviously one wanting to promote its product).
    Legislation is unlikely to be forth coming but we can always dream.
    It’s going to be intresting to see you rip this apart but if you feel like it offer up another solution.

    in reply to: English Electric Lightening CG Painting #230950
    hopefully1
    Participant

    luv your pictures, keep them coming or link us to your own site.I expect this one would be a brown trouser moment for both pilots though.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 67 total)