Well I suppose that the “Little Boats” is the story of Dunkirk, mind you the little boat in question had to go a long way in one day to make the story work. A Dorset to Dunkirk round trip is about 300 nautical miles! I know it didn’t actually get to Dunkirk but……..
Steve
The broomstick has been commented upon in non aviation forums as well. If ever something needed CGI it was that. It’s an example of very lazy film making and not the only example Dunkirk had to offer either.
Steve
This one Daren? It starts a few mins in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbnZ7sZxKvE
……..and this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0FBO87XCGs
Steve
Darren,
I think gorgeous could be applied to all of the Spifire shots in the film.
Steve
In fact I think it’s probably a reversed image, because in the film it lands on the northern most beach heading north east! or did I imagine that?
Anyway it’s a really good sequence.
Steve
The Pitot seems to be on the wrong wing?
I thought that the plane seemed to stop rather too quickly in the film. I know Spits have brakes, but I’m not sure on that surface if I would want to use the brakes though.
Steve
Hi Peter,
Agree about the aerial sequences, they may even be the best we have had with Spits! The prominence of them in the film even made me wonder if Chris Nolan secretly wanted to make a B of B movie .
As to the beach landing, do we have confirmation that it actually happened? I guess that a wait for the DVD or BlueRay and a look through the Extras section is needed.
Steve
I see that you have some confirmation in and earlier post Peter, odd that there have been no actual photos.
Not winging or moaning. Over 300,000 men were evacuated from Dunkirk over a period of a few days. You would never have guessed this from the huge IMAX vistas of the beaches! I agree about the Stuka at the end, it didn’t even seem to have been shot at high speed. The other Stukas were really very menacing, in fact all of the model work was outstanding and streaks ahead of anything in B of B.
Steve
Just came back from seeing it. I thought it was good, but way too short, and did not really convey the gravitas and scale of the event all that well. I have several issues, some of which have already been mentioned in other posts, notably the Spitfire becoming a performance glider. This is what I would call a reverse war film, war films of late have got all the nitty gritty on the ground fairly accurate and anything in the sky has been pretty grim. This is the other way round, the flying was really good, the sinking ships were amazing, the completely empty beaches not so. The weather continuity was awful, the Navy ships seemed too modern, and the train carriage interior? I’ll have to check that. Lastly the burning Spit without any fuel in, and quite clearly no engine.
Don’t get me wrong I did like it, and it does tell the story in easy to chew segments. Some things just niggled.
Steve
Oh, and the cameo was just perfect!
It probably would Peter, but in this pick you can clearly see that the cockpit canopy groove finishes before the second upright of the V, where as in the new pick the grove extends slightly beyond. The camo pattern is very clear in this pick and is not the same as in your new pick. See posts above. All in all it’s a different Spit. Very interesting thread though.
Steve
I think that the QV codes are further forward in the new image. Look at where both letters end. It looks different to me anyway.
Steve
[ATTACH=CONFIG]254454[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]254453[/ATTACH]
I’ve got some bits of that!
Steve
Yes saw the thread when it was new. It just sounded as if there was some more info?
Steve
Interesting Dave. Would you like to elaborate on that?
Steve
No Stirling then?
Steve