That is obsolete yesterdays thinking. But this forum does proof too, that most people are unwilling to change their accustomet belief. 😉
Like it or not, there are genuine grounds for NATO countries to avoid Russian equipment, especially military hardware.
Recent disagreements with Russia over Gas prices, the war with Georgia, the Litvinenko affair with the UK come just off the top of my head. Arguments such as these could disrupt the flow of spare parts and/or production aircraft, and would give Russia even more political leverage.
It’s not that their hardware isn’t up to the job (in most cases), but these reasons, combined with EU tariffs and entrenched attitudes and preconceptions will, imho, prevent Western European nations from buying Russian military hardware.
So that Japanese talk about developing their own 5:th gen fighter was just hot air after all? Gosh, who would have thunk! 😮
Not necessarily, the US may still refuse to export their Raptors.
But, what if the Japanese or others offered to develop their own RAM and Radar to be used in the aircraft? This would eliminate the need for the US to export said sensitive technology, and it would be bags cheaper than developing a whole new aircraft.
How is the experience in the UK with their Merlins ? Most things I read about it and it’s variants are negative reports about quality issues and low availability.
Just two examples:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2004/10/20/cormorant_ground041020.htmlhttp://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=f2bb3c5f-8663-4987-bab2-0d598d126052&k=84953
I concur with the last poster, apart from the normal teething problems when they were brought in the UK armed forces seem happy with their Merlins.
I for one would like to see the UK order more.
Found this today, the internet a la 1964!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9dpXHnJXaE
Pure tech-nerd heaven! 😀
Found this today, the internet a la 1964!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9dpXHnJXaE
Pure tech-nerd heaven! 😀
Interesting article there.
My understanding is that there are an increasing number of Sikhs who forgo the wearing of the turban, keeping long hair etc.
A Herc wouldn’t have the performance, nor the degree of operator comfort required for sustained efficiency. Nor is it a good platform for the required antennas. And it’s small. You can put a capsule in the hold, of course, as the Yanks do with their Senior Hunter aircraft, but the result is an Elint aircraft with a very limited number of operators.
A C-17 might be a better option, or maybe even an A400M.
Using a C-17 would be like using a Rolls-Royce as a taxi, it can do the job well, but its needlessly extravagant.
The only hope the N.Kor Army has to win is in a massive blitzkrieg style attack, which given its outmoded equipment is most likely to be a bloodbath.
Unless they use nukes, in which case I would imagine a retaliatory US strike, then nobody wins anything.
Well, the Il-76 is a highly capable aircraft, but is it politically acceptable to the West?
The C-2 could be very promising (if they can ever export it), as could the new Embraer offering.
It’ll be interesting to see where it goes.
So, if the C-17 line closes tomorrow, what alternatives are available?
Is the An-124 line open again?
I agree with the spirit of the petition, but it doesn’t go far enough, imho.
Gurkhas should enjoy the same pay and pension as any other soldier in the UK armed forces, and automatically have pensions after service, especially if they are wounded or killed in action.
I agree with the spirit of the petition, but it doesn’t go far enough, imho.
Gurkhas should enjoy the same pay and pension as any other soldier in the UK armed forces, and automatically have pensions after service, especially if they are wounded or killed in action.
And who can forget Sean Connery, a Scotsman playing a Russian in ‘The Hunt for Red October’; he didn’t even try!
And who can forget Sean Connery, a Scotsman playing a Russian in ‘The Hunt for Red October’; he didn’t even try!
Can you put up some screenshots or images?