dark light

N.Wotherspoon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 578 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 109 Canopy for sale #1328959
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Legless – Who me?!!!

    Perhaps TimeTeam could do a dig in “Nick’s” garden for other aviation esoterica related to legless aces who allegedly lurked about in Liverpool? 😀

    Yes I can see it now….Location: Nick’s garden… Tony speaks: ….and you think his Me109 glided this far after he bailed out? 50 miles is a long way you know! Nick replies: Well it must be true… here’s the canopy I found used as a cloche when we moved in (quickly hides the eBay invoice taped to it):dev2:

    Now I do have an old MG in the garage, hand painted RAF blue and reputedly formerly belonging to a well know RAF officer – I am sure with a bit of constructive research (such as many eBay sellers seem to be experts at), a suitable provenance could be arranged! 😮

    I also have lots of pots of paint!!! :dev2:

    in reply to: Wreckology. #1246085
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Hello Garry – I’m afraid I really do not see why you started this thread – as you rightly say you have made your views known before and your initial post seems to merely have been intended to tempt enthusiasts into joining a debate, so that you could then reiterate your opinions once again?

    There are those of us who behave responcibly and believe what we are doing IS preserving and recording the history of which you speak, as well as perpetuating the memory of those who lost their lives – private ownership of recovered material obviously seems to be an issue to you, but I fail to see how this could be overcome as the MOD themselves insist that ownership is passed to a named individual – the licensee. I do agree that the selling of recovered material for profit raises many issues and personally disagree with such activity for reasons that I have expressed before and feel no need to do so again – However I recognise there are those who have views other than mine and acknowledge their right to do as they see fit within the law.

    Finally I was surprised by your comment re relatives etc wishing wreckage to be left where it fell, I have very rarely come across such views – vey much the opposite, in fact – in over 25 years of this hobby and talking to and meeting more relatives and landowners than I care to remember, only once did such a request come from a relative – actually it came indirectly as the relatives I spoke to actually wanted the aircraft excavated and wished to attend the dig – just could I wait until the pilots sister had passed away! – the circumstances of the crash were particulalrly tragic and they did not want to risk upsetting her by bringing back the memories, as she was very frail – I of course agreed to shelve the project.

    in reply to: unusual air combat encounters #1276689
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Chivalry?

    Wasn’t there a DH Dragon reported as being shot down by a HeIII off Cornwall – not really combat I know, but certainly counts as unusual – If I recall corectly the German crew then radioed a distress call on behalf of their victim – Conscience perhaps? or an attempt at WW1 style chivalry? In the end I don’t think it helped them much as nothing was ever found? 🙁

    in reply to: lake warbirds #1279632
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    It would be interesting to know what became of Magister L8355,how intact was it when recovered? Does anyone know what became of it? Knowing how ATC units tend to treat wreckage/crash sites I don’t hold out much hope of it having survived:(

    G.O.

    Tried to track it down a few years ago – seems usual story – took up space needed for other things and as it began to decay / need work to preserve, interest was lost and it got slowly discarded piece by piece – I believe the instrument panel is still around and the engine is apparently in someones back garden loacally, though no one would say exactly whose!!!

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1319292
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Deactivation the easy way?

    Did the EOD team really blow up the unloaded .50 cals and a very rare remotely controlled turret ???:eek:

    Er Yes! 🙁 – We had reservations about EOD being on site for the dig, having heard horror stories from others – However it was compulsory for the Filming peoples insurance + we did have rather a lot of people on site who did not really know what they were doing!!! 😉 so perhaps it was a wise precaution.

    We had discussed with TT the liklihood of guns turning up and obviously that we would want to keep them! So we arranged for a gunsmith with the appropriate section clearance to take any that were found and deac them – It was understood when EOD took the guns into their custody that they were going to check them for ammunition and deliver them for deactivation – However it seems that whilst the commanding officer was on leave, some unknown member of EOD took it upon themselves to complete both tasks the easy way – with semtex! 😡

    The shattered remains were then delivered back to the museum – breech frames blown apart, one gun blown in two and minus several major parts of the guns and most of the turret – probably as the bits flew too far to warrant picking them up 🙁

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1320765
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Back on track?

    As a member of BAAC, I feel I should probably keep my views on their effectiveness with regard to the MOD to myself for now :rolleyes: Though I am sure it is not for want of trying on their part!

    To get back on track a little with reagard to details of recent Aviation Archaeology, I have started on the promised website updates and have just uploaded a proper account of our Time Team dig on the two A-26 Invaders – plenty of pictures too! 🙂 Enjoy!

    http://web.ukonline.co.uk/lait/site/Time%20Team.htm

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1322729
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    MOD taking action !!!

    Nick – if the MOD are going to be even handed on this, and if the dig was post August 1986, (was it?) then they ought to be pressed to pursue the farmer:

    a) for excavating it without a licence
    b) retaining Crown property without authority and without submitting the PMRA returns pro-forma

    They can’t have it both ways….ie expect to pursue or prosecute wreck recovery organisations for indiscretions but turn a blind eye to farmers or landowners. The law applies equally to them, bizarre though it may sound. They ALSO need a licence.

    😉

    Andy Saunders

    Hi Andy – Yes it was post 1986 – PAM had a licence – I was there for my detecting equipment and knowledege of the use of it to locate the engines – to my knowledge the forms were passed on, but that was the end of it – He had always known the plane was there, but IMO wanted it confirming and locating for him, so he didnt have to dig half his field up – probably the only reason he gave consent – again IMO – The two engines, U/C legs and props are still in his barn – along with a major part of a Meteor (if I recall correctly) that he he excavated from a neighbouring farm, after it was uncovered during drainage work – NO OFFICIAL ACTION WHATSOEVER WAS EVER TAKEN as far as I am aware to date.

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1322894
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Retaining item recovered without a licence

    Nick, so you finally got the e-mail from Catterick. It’s brilliant isn’t it.

    We’ll just have to hope that the MoD calm down enough from the shock that someone dug a site without a licence to allow the recovered items to be retained. If not it could always be the test case.

    Still not sure how to respond to the email – perhaps that means I am not calm enough yet! :dev2:

    Re retention of material recovered without a licence – I recall a dig by the PAM several years ago on a Halifax – The landowner had always taken a great deal of interest, but has the dig progressed he gradually seemed to takeover (IMO). Both inboard engines were present (Hercules) & in remarkable condition with all pots intact, relatively undamaged finning and most ancilliaries present as well – all with minimal corrosion. We recovered the first engine – so complete it took two machines to lift it, but did not have the equipment to move it, so the farmer offered to store it and we were due to return for it and to recover the second engine the following weekend.

    However I believe when DS rang to check the arrangements he was told not to bother as they (landowner and his employees) had already recovered it – in even better condition and c/w prop. Also it was made quite clear that the farmer considered the remains to be his property and had no intention of giving them up.

    As I understand it, DS reported the situation to the MOD when completing PAM’s return on the dig – to explain that PAM had only conducted a partial excavation, had only removed limited remains and were not responsible for the additional excavation or items recovered – their response was simply to send an extra set of application and return forms, with instructions that they were to be given to the landowner on our next visit and for US to ask him to complete and return them!!!!

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1323822
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Where are all the Digs?

    Perhaps it’s me, but important though all this discussion is, the start of the thread was an enquiry about current “dig” activity. Given that I responded with news about a Mosquito in Milton Keynes, I am surprised (well, not THAT surprised), that there has been absolutely nor response to that at all. Perhaps you all knew about it already?

    I think Steve that it has become pretty evident that the main problem is not that there are not any digs taking place (& no I have’nt heard about the Mossie – please do tell – with pics if poss!) but that we have all become very guarded and no-one is getting to hear what is going on.

    From the start when I put together my group, I wanted to publish the results of what we had researched and share the knowledge and the experiences with others. To this end I started my website at about that time and the feedback I have had from it has been tremendous, putting me in touch with all sorts of people conected with those who were involved in the incidents that I had researched.

    However the whole hobby has become dulled (for me) by all this “changing goalposts” as Andy puts it. I have found myself being reluctant to publish material on my website and becoming preoccupied with paperwork – one permit for a very low key recovery last year took 8 months to obtain and was initially refused outright. Another simply to collect surface remains from a HGW site took 10 months – largely due to the County Archaeologist / SMR registrar – he holds both posts and seems to have decicded that if has been consulted by the MOD, then he has the authority to impsose any conditions he likes – in the end he admitted that he had not even read my 2 page project proposal – though he had sent me a letter stating that in his opinion it was not up to the required standard 😡 He then withdrew his objection and I had a permit in a week – just in time for the shooting season – so that’s that until February – to be honest I would be surprised if the artefacts are even still there!

    The latest development has been that I (and others) have received an email from an MOD official based at Catterick, who is assessing the performance and response of the SMRs!!! – I am waitng to calm down before responding! :diablo:

    And that’s not evening mentioning the member of Lancs constabulary who decided that I had illegally removed a weapon from a crash site – as my permit did not give me authority to do so and therefore I had committed an arrestable offence + was in possesion of a section 5 firearm – oh what fun I had with that one 🙁 before the inspecting officer came back off leave and sanity finally prevailed – It was me who was reporting the damn thing to them in the first place.

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1324828
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    MOD

    Nick – I have been in contact with MOD on various matters and enquired if there was any reason why dealing with PMRA returns was taking 18 months as I had learnt that this was so in some cases. The reply was that all are dealt with and turned around within two weeks! So….you may want to contact them? Andy

    Hi Andy – sorry for late reply – spent the weekend under Mable! 😉 My 1972 Series Landy! 😀 I have contacted them twice with regard to the longest overdue return – both times I was told that there was no problem, all the paperwork was in order and it was simply a matter of waiting for it to go through the system.

    Note they have a new webpage now, in case people have’nt seen it at:http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/WhatWeDo/Personnel/AFPAA/AviationArchaeology.htm

    Amongst the usual dire warnings I noted the following:

    “Applicants for a licence under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986 should therefore check with the Council or local Sites and Monuments Records Officer in advance, or at the same time, as applying for a licence from the Ministry of Defence.”

    “Excavations are licensed on the understanding that the Ministry of Defence may require the licensee to surrender all items recovered to the Department without compensation.”

    Definitely not sure about the legality of the last part of that one! Forgive my ignorance, but in the case of salvaged material from the sea, the salvor has a right to charge for the cost of recovery if the owner decides to reclaim the items? Surely there would be grounds for something similar on land?

    “applicants should apply for a licence at least 3 month before they intend to commence work.”

    and on a slightly more positive note for you Andy!

    “Outside the United Kingdom, International or British territorial waters, the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986 does not apply.”

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1331384
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Helpful???

    Maybe aviation archaeology in the UK would be taken more seriously if those involved acted in a more responsible manner,a start would be a database of recovered wreckage giving details of who has what and from which sites.

    Of course it dosen’t help when there are those who will purposely dig sites known to contain human remains….

    As far as I am concerned Aviation Archaeology is my HOBBY- not a profession and I have yet to hear of anyone getting paid for this activity – let alone cash strapped County archaeologists wishing to spend their meagre excavation funding on it.

    I, like most I know in this HOBBY, do keep records and carry out detailed research – indeed to obtain ownership of the recovered items you have to provide details to the MOD – therefore they DO have records of much of what has been recovered, from where and by whom! Perhaps you should ask them to share this information?

    I would dearly love the luxury of full professional archeaological recording of my digs, perhaps with nice scale drawings of all of the millions of aluminium cornflakes? However I spend much of my time directing the excavator operator and ensuring that no-one is at risk from the machinery we use or that any excavation is becoming unstable, not to mention keeping an eye on spectators who may be edging too close to an open hole (or clearing off with finds!). Sometimes I even get time to assist lifting the odd artefact.

    We try to designate at least one person to photograph and/or video a dig and often make sketches of the attitude of an artefact before lifting – such as a gun – as this gives clues as to the final moments of the flight -again I expect such activity is pretty generally accepted by all. All this goes into my individual incident files and summary reports are made for the county archaeologist and English Heritage via BAAC – WHEN I GET THE SPARE TIME!

    Obviously garry you are very well informed on this issue – I could take your comments as a personal insult, as they seem to be directed at the hobby as a whole – But I won’t as I am always prepared to give the benefit of doubt – unlike you it seems?

    OK Rant Over! – That should get some discussion going! :dev2:

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1332309
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Transfer of title

    Thats interesting Nick. I wonder what the MOD are up to? I would be very very interested to know from others involved in aircraft recoveries whether ANY formal transfers of “ownership” have taken place within the last 18 months? Something is going on…….:confused:

    Not sure what they are up to – getting fed up of jumping through hoops for permits though 🙁 County Archaeologist seems to think he can veto our digs now and demand professional level project proposals and recovery reports from us with full archaeological recording – he can only have got this impression from the MOD – IMO of course!

    Thought the returns may have something to do with our recent finds?

    Mk V BL585[ATTACH]149725[/ATTACH] and Mk V BL688 [ATTACH]149726[/ATTACH]

    All have been fully inspected by the County firearms department and the pair even de-activated – all paperwork and certificates sent to MOD – I hate paperwork! 🙁

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1332507
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Do I understand that correctly, Nick? Over two years and the MOD have not dealt with your returns or formally transferred ownership???? Andy Saunders

    Hi Andy – bit under two years – around 18 months to be exact – but yes that is correct 🙁

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1332814
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    Anything left?

    Oh just odds and ends :dev2: [ATTACH]149701[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology UK Still Alive? (2007 Zombie) #1332956
    N.Wotherspoon
    Participant

    A man on this site has recently written a book about the wrecks he has investigated… Very good it is too..

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/North-West-Aircraft-Wrecks-Insights-Dramatic/dp/1844154785/sr=8-1/qid=1168945826/ref=sr_1_1/203-6083573-9537508?ie=UTF8&s=books

    PS. Nick thanks for the list of the 2000 incidents at the back – Will keep me busy for months!!!

    Hi Paul

    Your welcome 🙂 though the details are brief and I had a lot of trouble editing and combining various excel files that I had the info stored on – despite the odd duplicate and red herrings, such as aircraft that took off from or were travelling to rather than crashed in the North West, it should give anyone new to research a good starting point – which was the idea.

    As for news of digs, yes we have several in the pipeline – some new and a few, as Andy says, re-digs of old sites. Also I am committed to getting my website up to date now, despite the total absence of any returns on our last two years digs from the MOD :confused: – I had decided to wait for the paperwork in light of some horror stories I heard from a group who published the results of a site investigation on the web, before ensuring all was present and correct – seems the MOD have the time and inclination to monitor our websites 😮

    There I go again getting controversial – so best shut up now & get back to work :dev2:

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 578 total)