Combitechs newly appointed vice president Lars Ydreskog, former operating director of the Gripen project at Saab, recruited to lead Combitech’s commitment to digitalization, told what the concept model-based development meant for the Gripen project.
The number of system failures was reduced by 90 percent and errors could often be fixed on days instead of months. All codes are tested according to the most safety-critical standard. There were basically no errors in the auto generated code. The model-based approach has allowed the errors to be predicted before the system was started.
– This is the end of the discussion if model-based development works or does not work. It works, said Lars Ydreskog.
With the software platform in generation E, a new feature can be downloaded like an app to a mobile phone.
– Some updates that took three to four years earlier can now be done on days or weeks, if it is about simpler features. That is why we call Gripen E for a smart fighter, said Lars Ydreskog.
Google translated from: http://www.nyteknik.se/fordon/modellbaserad-utveckling-kapar-ledtiderna-for-gripen-6846218
Regarding basing all F-35’s in one place, would that be due to the likely cost of buying and operating F-35? What if an alternative were chosen where more aircraft at 2 bases was affordale, wouldn’t an aggressor just zap 2 airbases rather than 1?
Yes, buying and operating “a large number” (i.e., 50 or so) F-35 is very expensive, and Norway which has a much stronger economy than Finland will operate their F-35 from one base in central Norway (although there will be a forward base with around 4 F-35 for QRA, in Northern Norway). I may be wrong but I doubt Finland can afford to operate more than one airbase.
It seems to me it will be a much more challenging operation to take out two airbases in two simultanous surprise attacks, than to take out just one. The keyword remains “surprise”…
What they could also do was to make an agreement with Sweden that in case the Finnish airbases are knocked out Finland could on very short notice get access to a certain number of Swedish Gripen E, and vice versa; after a surprise attack on Swedish airbases Sweden could get access to Finnish Gripen E. However such an agreement is of course not there.
Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Damir Krstičević toured on Wednesday in the barracks at Pleso Swedish Gripen fighter aircraft, expressing hope that Croatia by the end of the year to decide whether to ‘include the military component “and that it was an aircraft.
– This component is very important for the army and we have so far met with the experiences of Israel and Romania regarding aircraft F16 that they chose – said Krstičević announcing that Croatian expert team still plans to visit Hungary and the Czech Republic to introduce their experiences with Gripen.
Google translated from: http://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/gripeni-stigli-u-hrvatsku-odrzana-velika-prezentacija-vojnih-aviona-koje-bi-lijepa-nasa-mogla-kupiti-krsticevic-nadam-se-odluci-do-kraja-godine/5998606/
“The recent US Tomahawk strike into Syria demonstrates that fixed airfields could be destroyed or made unusable for a short period of time.”
http://www.defensenews.com/articles/lockheed-vp-theres-a-part-of-israel-in-every-f-35
This is supporting what I’ve said previously; it may be dangerous for Finland to purchase a few F-35 and put them in one airbase — especially considering the capabilities of the neighbour. An F-35 that cannot get airborne is useless.
F-35B is in any case not an option for Finland — way too expensive.
WoW!
What?
So in the future Russian jets will be twin-seated and carry a computer hacker in the back-seat that will hack into the Meteor missile and redirect it towards the launch platform? 😀
Halloweene (or Kovy or somebody else) would you mind reposting the info on the plans for the F3R+/F4?
The previous thread was a good reference…
Don’t you follow Trump on twitter? He and Xi are best friends
That’s what I alluded to when I said “friend today, enemy tomorrow” — right now they are best friends mainly because of North Korea however it seems things can change rapidly with Trump.
Taiwan’s Ministry of Defense will formally declare its intention to procure fifth generation Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II fighter aircraft to U.S. officials in July, according to the country’s Minister of National Defense Feng Shih-kuan.
http://thediplomat.com/2017/05/taiwan-pushes-for-sale-of-f-35-fighter-jets/
Will they get them or not?
I guess not — however with Trump you never know. Friend today, enemy tomorrow…
If the “good relationship” between Trump and Jingping suddenly turns sour, I would not be surprised if Trump turns around and says “why don’t we sell some F-35 to our good friends in Taiwan”.
On verra.
Boeing withdraws from yet another competition:
Boeing’s decision to withdraw its widely-used Harpoon missile leaves the Raytheon/Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile (NSM) and Lockheed Martin Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) as the likely candidates in the OTH effort.
Full story: http://www.defensenews.com/articles/boeing-pulls-harpoon-from-us-navy-missile-competition
The addition of the Meteor massively boosts the Typhoon’s air-to-air prowess. Especially in combination with the Typhoon’s outstanding high altitude performance and blistering speed, the Meteor offers incredible range combined with improved radar guidance—though the RAF will not discuss the advancements in that arena.
To fully take advantage of the capabilities of the Meteor, the RAF is hoping to field a new CAPTOR-E active electronically scanned array radar by 2021, Hoyle said.
SOFIA May 2 (Reuters) – Bulgaria’s new government, expected to take office this week, will have to decide whether or not to start talks with Sweden to acquire eight new Gripen combat jets made by SAAB, interim deputy premier Stefan Yanev said on Tuesday.
President Rumen Radev has said that if the next government declines to accept the ranking it would neglect the military expertise and would be taking a political decision.
Apart from all that, the only one thing sure about Erieye for me is that it can’t look 360. That’s why it got dropped out so early in the Korean E-X. The RoC clearly stated a 360 detection and Erieye was not able to do that. I’ve also saw several arguments about whether Erieye is able to detect 360 or not, including the one here in keypublishing, 2006. SAAB stated a 360 detection and so did the other sources like flight, etc. claiming compensated 360 detection with optimal performance for 150 degrees each side… guess that was a vine from SAAB.
AFAIK the Erieye has a secondary AESA radar integrated with the primary. Detection is 360 degrees but I believe tracking is limited outside of the 300 degrees covered by the primary radar.
Saab has sold Erieye/Globaleye to 8 countries, so it seems some air forces are happy with it.
The Defense Security Cooperation Agency stated that Australia has requested the possible sale under the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program of up to 70 AGM-88B High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM) tactical missiles and up to 40 AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) tactical missiles, and training missiles, among other things. The prime contractors are Orbital ATK and Raytheon.
Full story: http://adbr.com.au/us-approves-sale-of-anti-radiation-missiles-for-raaf-growler/
Interesting — Australia is developing a full SEAD/DEAD capability with the Growlers it seems.
Cooper is again striking a Russian card of interest to Finland. He tells that the British Air Force has flown with his Eurofighters in training against the Russian SU-30 fighters in the Indian Air Force. The SU-30 is a twin-engine multifunctional fighter such as the Eurofighter, and the Indian Air Force has 230 aircraft.
– I can not tell you exactly how it happened. But I can say that the Indians were not happy, he hints at the outcome of the exercise.
Google translated from: http://yle.fi/uutiset/3-9588512