dark light

Loke

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 3,001 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2139913
    Loke
    Participant

    Used CNAMO simulating for scenarion N°2 on Air-Defense.

    CNAMO? I googled it but could not finde anything that seemed relevant? What is it? A kind of simulator?

    Who did the simulation and what was the outcome?

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2139946
    Loke
    Participant
    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2139948
    Loke
    Participant

    He was the first Royal Norwegian Air Force pilot to fly the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II in November 2015. Since then, he flew the jet for 170 hours, all of those at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona, where he now serves as an instructor pilot. Right now, he and his Royal Norwegian Air Force colleagues begin preparations to ferry three F-35s to Norway later this year.

    AHF: What has been your most memorable F-35 experience so far?
    Hanche: “It is difficult to pick out one specific situation. However, the first flight in the F-35A was an obvious highlight. Several things immediately struck me on that first flight. For one how well the F-35A handles, both on the ground and in the air. It is a well-behaved airplane. Another early impression was how powerful the F-35A is. The Lightning has an impressive acceleration and rate of climb, and the airspeed can easily “run away” from you if you do not pay attention. Another more specific highlight would be the first time I fought F-16s. It was impressive to see just how uneven that fight is, in favor of the F-35.”

    Full story: http://airheadsfly.com/2017/03/27/norway-f-35-pilot-we-are-on-track/

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2139951
    Loke
    Participant

    In replacing 54 aging F-16s, the Belgian air force has appeared to favor the F-35 as a way to ease ongoing cooperation with neighboring countries. The question is whether that will continue as the nation begins a formal competition for 34 new fighters.*

    http://aviationweek.com/aviation-week-space-technology/does-f-35-have-edge-belgium-s-fighter-competition

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2139954
    Loke
    Participant

    Someone tested on Command…

    What does this mean?

    in reply to: Strange Air Forces: Royal Malaysian Air Force #2139956
    Loke
    Participant

    Malaysia is still not ready to decide on the purchase of fighter jets from French Dassault.
    “We still are not ready for a decision, but we take note of Rafale’s success in other nations,” Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said during a joint press conference with French President Francois Hollande in Kuala Lumpur Tuesday.

    http://www.defenseworld.net/news/18841/Malaysia_Not_Ready_For_Decision_On_Purchase_Of_Fighters__Prime_Minister#.WNoYOoVOKUk

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2140408
    Loke
    Participant

    So, do people agree with my assessment that the only 4.5 gen a/c that may be able to complete all the missions successfully is the Rafale?

    Loke
    Participant

    Given German reluctance to invest in current programmes, I doubt they will fund a new fighter on their own.

    The times are changing… Trump in WH, brexit in Europe, Russia in Ukraine…

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2140412
    Loke
    Participant

    Even if I find this slow motion footage beautiful, there is no high angle of attack involved here.

    t’s a joke — hence the smiley 😉

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2140611
    Loke
    Participant

    https://twitter.com/wildaboutimages/status/842315796382597120

    So what is the max AOA in this clip ? 🙂

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2140619
    Loke
    Participant

    Right, that is why i said block 4. They should be able to provide block 4.1 software, and block 4.2 hardware by 2023 deliveries and later upgrade 4.3 software and 4.4 hardware in the post 2025 time-frame.

    What do you mean; are there problems with upgrading from bl 3 to bl 4??

    Norway’s first F-35 are bl 3 of course…

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2140865
    Loke
    Participant

    RFP specifies that first four aircraft, all internal systems installed, must be delivered 2023. This is too soon for Gripen E or Rafale F4.

    I am sure France can tweak things and make it available to Belgium in the 2023 time-frame — or at least a Rafale F3R++ that can very easily be updated to the full F4 once it becomes available.

    For Gripen (and also Typhoon and the SH) I doubt it will fare well in the most demanding scenarios, given the constraints on number of a/c, and lack of support.

    The interesting thing is how Rafale will do — it can carry quite a lot… including stand-off missiles for the most demanding missions. In addition the sensors and sensor fusion is quite good; the next iteration of SPECTRA will be quite awesome I suspect, probably reducing the need for a separate jamming capability even further. It is the only 4.5 gen fighter that may have chance to complete the missions IMHO…

    From one viewpoint the scenarios are not really over the top, as commented by Sintra technologially this is more like 2018 than 2035. No PAK FA and/or J-20 for instance.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2140876
    Loke
    Participant

    Taking into acount that the Belgians dont have AWACS and no jammer suport I think its normal that the scenarios also dont have them, they also didnt scripted the amunitions to be used in each scenario, this in itself speaks volumes.
    All in all, it seems a very decent doc.
    Kudos to the Belgian Air Force for that.

    Since Belgium is part of NATO they do have access to AWACS and jammer support…

    One may speculate in the (purely hypothetical scenario) how the missions would have looked like if the F-35 had not been available to Belgium.

    Of course since the F-35 is available one may as well specify the requirements such that AWACS and jammer support is not available….

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2140921
    Loke
    Participant

    Belgium RFP:

    http://www.vandeput.fgov.be/sites/default/files/articles/Request%20for%20Government%20Proposal_0.pdf

    Have a look at those scenarios in Annex C….

    executing those missions with no AWACs, no jammer support, only a 4-ship….

    I wonder why Saab, Boeing and Eurofighter bother to participate in this competition.

    I hope Belgium will do as the Danes; publish high-level summaries. If memory serves, Typhoon and SH were roughly in the same ballpark (both having some weak and strong points), with the F-35 doing significantly better in the most demanding missions.

    What I wonder about is where the Rafale F4 will be compared to the SH/Typhoon, and compared to the F-35…

    On verra.

    Edit: The scenarios are quite interesting — how would people on this board address them? Any takers? 🙂

    Loke
    Participant

    I could actually see a german-french fighter in the future. German capability in the area is rather limited, so letting France take the lead should not be a big problem as long as the industrial benefits is rather big. France on the other hand can probably not afford to keep going all by themselves in the future, in the same way that they have historically, and a partner like Germany would probably be the smoothest they can come up with as compared to Italy or the UK.

    Some big hurdles for the two countries to corporate to get out of the way, but that will need to happen sooner or later. Perhaps the new tank program between the two turns into something and that leads the way to more things.

    Good points and perhaps this will happen — however there are some roadblocks. One is cultural differences. Another is that France has a very strong desire to protect her defence industry.

    Still, France probably realize that she cannot afford to develop a 5. gen fighter (or 5.5 gen fighter as it may become) on her own, and realistically France must find a partner. Finding partner(s) in Europe would seem the obvious choice for France. Thus in spite of cultural differences, and in spite of huge internal resistance to become dependent on other countries for key technologies I also predict that at the end of the day France will accept the inevitable and enter into collaboration with others, and then Germany for sure will be a candidate.

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 3,001 total)