dark light

Loke

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 3,001 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2175753
    Loke
    Participant

    I am confused about all this talk about range improvement for the F-35 — I thought the F-35 was quite long-ranged…?:p

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2176199
    Loke
    Participant

    Will those new Rafale be F4.2?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2178765
    Loke
    Participant

    Gripen E will be more expensive to purchase than Gripen C (although I doubt the F414 is more expensive than the RM12 — probably it is the other way around!).

    However when it comes to operational costs I think we do not know yet. True, the Gripen E contains more equipment (like the IRST) however as already pointed out some components will probably require less maintainence e.g. the AESA radar.

    Gripen E is also designed to reduce operational costs.

    One may compare the F-22 to the F-35. Which is cheaper to operate? And which contains more features? F-35 has a lot of equipment that does not exist in the F-22. Still it is already much cheaper to operate. So “more features” does not necessarily mean “higher operational costs”.

    On verra.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2178836
    Loke
    Participant

    In Sweden, the development of the Gripen E continues. Between its first flight in June 2017 and October of last year, the prototype n ° 39-8 has made 20 flight. He has since equipped with a set of sensors required further tests. Ground trials are underway with including the carriage tilting tanks and weapons. The next flight test campaign should focus on the carriage of these external loads.

    The following two prototypes (39-9 and 39-10) are being assemblies and should be available soon for testing. 39-10 will be used for testing of the tactical systems. Saab also announced that the first Gripen E series is already being produced.

    auto-translated from: http://www.air-cosmos.com/singapore-air-show-2018-bientot-trois-prototypes-pour-le-gripen-e-106843

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2206688
    Loke
    Participant

    Never tired of french bashing qren’t you? Somehow hilarious and getting reaaaally tiring. Why do not you mention the second part of the article about Airbus negociating with Munich prosecutor about Austrian Typhoon procurement?

    Agree that this should be mentioned but not necessariliy in this thread — perhaps in the Typhoon thread?

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2207531
    Loke
    Participant

    Canada will never buy a fighter not produced in the US. So it will be either the F-35A, F-35B, or the F-35C. Personally I think they will go for the F-35A.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2207628
    Loke
    Participant

    According to Dassault, nine Rafale aircraft were delivered during the year, with one aircraft for France, and a further eight to Egypt, in line with the company’s forecasted rates. The level was stable compared to 2016 rates of production, when six aircraft were delivered to the French military and three to Egypt.
    The company also delivered one Rafale to the French Navy retrofitted to the aircraft’s F3 standard. The F3 standard covers improved digitisation, an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, and the ability to carry a greater range of sensors and targeting systems.
    The company currently has a backlog of 101 Rafale aircraft, of which 31 are for the French military and 70 are for export customers. This is to be boosted by a further 12 aircraft once the company received a down-payment from Qatar for the aircraft ordered in December 2017. In 2016, the company had a backlog of 110 Rafale aircraft, with 32 for the French military and 78 for export customers.

    http://www.janes.com/article/76901/dassault-reveals-orders-deliveries-for-2017

    Still a quite decent backlog.

    Will the Indian Navy become the next Rafale customer?

    https://www.livefistdefence.com/2018/01/navy-dogfight-begins-india-opens-talks-with-boeing-dassault.html

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2207711
    Loke
    Participant

    Thales will also update Spectra’s solid-state jamming subsystem, which was one of the first to use electronically steered phased-array antennas. Carrara says for F3R, Spectra will include more powerful antennas, while further increasing the power supply so that more threats can be jammed simultaneously. Like Saab, Thales will use GaN technology because of its power and efficiency.

    Is this from the 2014 article?

    I am not sure if the GaN for F3R is still valid though — in the article I linked to above (from July 2017) I get the clear impression that GaN has been shifted to F4.2 (?)

    Thales and the DGA are actively preparing the future radar developments that will be
    introduced on Standard F4.2, incorporating cutting-edge Gallium Nitride (GaN) technology
    for the radar and jammer antennas.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2003553
    Loke
    Participant

    Navy dogfight begins:

    https://www.livefistdefence.com/2018/01/navy-dogfight-begins-india-opens-talks-with-boeing-dassault.html

    Mig, Gripen are out, according to this report.

    So is Tejas mk2…

    I guess if the Indian Navy could manage to have some synergies with the IAF, it would give Rafale an advantage…?

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2208272
    Loke
    Participant

    So will we see any new Rafale new customers this year?

    I think no; however perhaps we will see India order some more?

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2208526
    Loke
    Participant

    For new Rafale thread readers (and old ones with poor memory, like myself):

    http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=25484

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2208863
    Loke
    Participant

    If I recall correctly the IAF is paying quite a lot for the extras, so I assume it is something significant. Perhaps some of the Indian forum members can shed light on this? What was the amount and what was it about?

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2208902
    Loke
    Participant

    eagle1, thanks.

    I am still not sure about the “active cancellation” parth though — no doubt SPECTRA has jamming modes that can make the Rafale “invisible” to radar, however I believe there are techniques that can be used that are not based on producing an echo that is out of phase. Seems tricky to do.

    I wonder what extras the Indians have ordered… As far as I can recall one of the things was that they will expand the SPECTRA bandwidth even further!?

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2208944
    Loke
    Participant

    That is indeed the thing that bothers me with the scenario. Beyond the weapon and even the platform, and however effective and potent those may be , there are way more assets involved in SEAD/DEAD, for intelligence gathering notably which Belgium does not possess or does it ?. So the scenario and as it is stated, has only meaning within a coalition and more specifically an OTAN coalition .
    Hence the question to any Belgium fellow on this forum , is it truly the ambition of the BAF to execute SEAD/DEAD mission for the OTAN based on intelligence from other members ( US most likely ) ?. I do not think sending 4 aircrafts at random or vaguely to an area for “opportunistic ” SEAD mission to be very likely and realistic .
    Is there a supporting plan in Belgium for acquiring more intelligence gathering capability, like satellites or else to support the ambition of conducting SEAD/DEAD on their own ?

    My understanding of the amazing capabilities of the F-35 is that it should indeed be able to complete a mission described in the Belgium SEAD/DEAD scenario.

    The sensors of F-35 are truly amazing and together with the 5. gen sensor fusion the SA of a 4-ship of F-35 will be incredible. They will be able to locate and ID the threats by themselves. The stealth makes it possible to fly close enough to do the detection, localization and ID without relying on other intelligence sources.

    A 4-ship of 4. gen fighter typically fly quite “close” to each other. A 4-ship of F-35 however willl fly with quite a large distance between each plane, and share information through the secure high-speed MADL link. Thus even just 4 F-35 will be able to cover a very large area.

    My guess is that a mature 4.5 gen fighter like Rafale F4 can fly with a bigger distance between the planes compared to the traditional 4. gen fighters, but still need to fly much closer than what the F-35 is capable of. And the lack of stealth must be compensated for by a combination of stand-off weapons and jamming. This is why I think the F4 will be important to turn the Rafale into a “decent” SEAD platform. It’s probably not there yet.

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2208961
    Loke
    Participant

    If the RAF AESA comes to fruition, then it will be a great thing to use against air defences in combination with lots of SPEAR 3 and the range they give you. But there is little information out there, because this side of things is being kept murky on purpose I suspect.

    It will certainly be a huge improvement, however those double-digit SAM systems are quite difficult to handle I think — you need either stealth or some very sophisticated/powerful jammers to get close enough, especially for S-400/S-500 systems. Also you needs sensors and avionics that can rapidly detect and locate components of the SAM system to target. I still feel that both today, but also in the future (assuming F4 is implemented) Rafale will score better than Typhoon on these important points.

    I may be wrong of course.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 3,001 total)