dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small helo capable ships #2052151
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    From what I have seen, the Visby’s are to have the helo in a standard hanger aft of the bridge, though I do remember there some talk about a lift lowering the helo down into a hanger below. What I always find interesting is the idea of teloscopic hangers like what the Russians have on some of their ships, IIRC the Lurssen ships used by the UAE have this function, I may be wrong about that though.

    How big are the new OPC’s that the RNZN are getting? They have a helo on board?

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #677754
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Should be a spectacular take off.

    What I want to know is why SIA is getting the first example when Qantas signed first?

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #721462
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Should be a spectacular take off.

    What I want to know is why SIA is getting the first example when Qantas signed first?

    in reply to: Czech Gripens delivered and accepted #2611160
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Thanks Castor: it is sad how dirt gets flung around during a comp, and to have it going after the victor has started delivery is just stupidity. The looser lost, that’s it, end of story! They should bow out gracefully and await their next chance. This goes to say a lot about that certain company and it’s attitude doesn’t it?

    So anyway what’s happening on the South African front?

    in reply to: Small helo capable ships #2052224
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Steve: thanks for the link, I’ve been looking for it for a long time, it doesn’t come up on any search down here.

    MPA: Mate that looks like it’s been added on after and covered with canvas, how odd. But that helo couldn’t be permanently deployed to that ship surely, the tail sticks out, they couldn’t close the hanger off from the elements should the need to work on the tail section and it’s raining.

    Terran: Visby is in no way small, think tiny mate

    Radar: interesting, they are more what I am looking for to answer my question, 630t is tiny, but are the helos permanently deployed? Is there a hanger for them?

    in reply to: Czech Gripens delivered and accepted #2611381
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    And how soon before we see a Hungarian or South African model?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2052279
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    boilers???

    What happened to the turbines that were originally proposed?

    in reply to: Guess the Dock 4 #2052284
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    makes for a damd fine ship if you ask me, hate to have to strip her and repain her in a new colour 😉

    in reply to: Guess the Dock 4 #2052333
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Ohh btw, the ship is listed as USS Boxer

    in reply to: Could USN use a dedicated training carrier? #2052337
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Wow, what’s this Arthur and I agreeing on something, May I die now to preserve this bliss 😛

    in reply to: Could USN use a dedicated training carrier? #2052410
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    it would take alot of pressure off the attack carriers and would be more responsive to the training needs of the Navy.

    Yes it would, but you think about it first mate, having those carriers means money for the Navy budget, start cutting the fleet and you’ll start reducing their budget. Even if you have one training carrier dedicated, you reduce the budget for the attack carriers.

    in reply to: Kuznetsov at Portsmouth?? #2052425
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    But are reports of it being decomissioned true?

    Doubt it mate, she’s just about ready to go for another cruise. She did a 20 Day stint of the coast of Norway last November and is about to go for a bigger trip this time, on an international visit, possibly including Portsmouth, but she is heading for the Mid Altantic this time. Well that’s what I heard, the Russians are very angry at having her sitting around and she is too new and important to be disposed of so soon (the Russian public are actually proud of it).

    If anyone was to buy her, it would come down to either India or China, India would put up a high price in an attempt to out bid China who actually has the funds to make one of their own, maybe that’s why they bought her sister (odd that nothings been heard of her since she made homeport- and all info regarding her is restricted now- so much foir the hotel theory).

    in reply to: Comparrison Upholder calss with Kilo class #2052432
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Oooo draging up our history mate, and on Anzac day, great call.

    Yes AE-2 did it back then but back then there weren’t as many navigational hazards as there are today, not to mention that AE-2 didn’t go all the way through.

    In the book, the kilo and later the Upholder travel through the entire channel underwater (somewhat hazardesly almost coming acropper with various local ferries and some merchant ships).

    AE-2 did it at nine phathoms, not very deep but still technology back then wasn’t anywhere near as it is today. nor was she as big as either of the ships being talked about. Can’t imagine either type going at nine phathoms, they’d be spotted for sure!

    Anyway, does either of the Boats have the responciveness and agillity to make such quick turns? Back in our O boats and certainly with our Collins, I know for sure that they don’t!

    in reply to: Comparrison Upholder calss with Kilo class #2052438
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Yeah I know about Naval Tech mate, thanks.

    But considering the capabilities, could a kilo actually do it?

    in reply to: Guess the Dock 4 #2052441
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    D’oh. Maybe I should look more closly at the pick, silly me, still that’s what comes of age and having a full week end with my daughters!!!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 3,659 total)