dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale on Foch #2055817
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Hahahahahaha, still the clown, good to see mate!!!

    in reply to: Swedish navy in India #2055821
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Gee that was a long trip for the Swedish navy, IIRC they don’t have any tankers, so that would account for so many stops, and at such varried destinations, very interesting.

    in reply to: Rafale on Foch #2055833
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Hey Buger mate, did you ever get home to MacDonald’s Island? HAHAHAHAHA

    in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2055837
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Steve, mate thanks for trying, but those aren’t it, this one here in the mag has a through deck, I’ve been on the In-Cat site and it’s not there either, I have emailed them and asked for some info, but as yet they have yet to reply. I might see if I can copy this pic and post it, with their permission of course.

    in reply to: Rafale on Foch #2055850
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    OK I’ve read a few things on this thread and I guess it’s time to clear up a few things.

    1. Sao Paulo can’t operate anything heavier than the current A-4 because the steam cat she has won’t take the load, if you’ll observe, not even the Trainer versions put to sea due to the heavier weight. The MdB is looking at refitting a stronger system capable of launching heavier a/c but funds are hard to come by atm what with Brazil needing other defence toys to play with. A-7’s would be right out due to their weight as would most things these days including a naval AMX, though one thought does spring to mind, a naval Tejas might work, hmmmm.

    2. There was a proposal put forth back in the early 90’s for a marinised version of the A-1, coinsidently also called the AF-1, but the cost of producing so few was deemed far too much, now if the Italians had have come on board or even the French as a replacement for their aging SuE’s, then they might have come into being. It’s a pitty though, Embraer did work hard on the planning!

    3. Yes the Raf was tested on Foch, but it was found that with both the Raf and the Hawkeye coming into service, they’d need a longer deck- CdG’s deck was lengthened two years after it’s launch to handle both a/c. The so called Ski Jump you have pictured there, isn’t a ramp at all, it’s an extention test piece, to see just how much length was actually needed, the end result was 4 meters forward and 2m aft. This would also have been the case if the French had of bought the Hornet, thus the MdB can’t buy them either

    4. As pointed out already, they are/were Zephyrs, these were produced for the French Navy because the French didn’t want to buy foregin trainers for their home fleet, IIRC something like 25 were eventually built and the last retired from front line duties in 1995.

    5.

    Well at a LA teather at least it was the best ground attack plane . And about the context italian AMXs were used , italian pilots claim they were iluminated by SAMs on their strike mission ( I think it was SA-6s but Im not sure ) .

    The AMX/A-1 does have a lot going for it and both the FAB and AMI will testify to that extent, their only weakness is as the pilots have explained- a lack of power in the engine. AMI pilots couldn’t praise the plane enough in ops over Kosovo, they were targets buy SA-6’s and managed to evade with relative ease.

    6. I too have thought abaout a carrier capable Gripen, alas without a major power jumping in to buy them, non will ever be produced, the cost of development would out weigh any purchace Brazil could possibly make, besides again I have to tie it back to weight with the cat, it wouldn’t be able to fire it off the deck!

    Oh and if the French only want 1 euro for those birds, who do I have to see to buy them? I’d even be happy to buy those SEIV’s for the same price let alone have them thrown in for free.

    in reply to: USS America goes down next month… #2055888
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    So what were ther test results?

    in reply to: Aircraft Carrier – coloured jersey's #2055891
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Hey mate, I’ll help out from memory and this also applies to the French carrier as well, can’t remember the Brazilian system.

    Yellow: Aircraft Directors
    Red: Armourment
    Brown: Fuel/ Hydraulic systems
    Purple: Air Frame
    Green: Ship-Aircraft systems (i.e launch bars/ cables, arrestor hooks and cables)

    in reply to: New Brazilian-made submarine Tikuna #2055894
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Wow that actually looks like a nice boat, what are the specs for it?

    in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2055907
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Does anyone have any specs and techs (and maybe some other pics) of In-Cat’s new 112m Amphibious Helicopter Transporter? I saw a pic of it in an article by Dr Carlo Kopp (believe it or not, I actually agreed with his views in this article) which was printed in Defence Today magazine for December/January.

    In this article he announces that the idea of the RAN aquiring two LHD’s is a little short of rediculous, the RAN should on the other hand be looking at buying one of these ships and say three smaller vessels (like the one mentioned above) for rapid deployment. This would cost the RAN less in the long term since the larger vessel would not be at sea as often as two smaller ones, with the third smaller one also along side.

    These smaller ships have a flight deck capable of flying off three Blackhawk sized a/c with stowage on the hanger deck for 6-8 of the said helos. They also have a flodable dock for taking on two of the army’s LCM8 landing craft plus a deck for vechiules and tanks. The design is compact, practicle and could make advances in the littoral logistical world (which since the demise of the heavy landing ships- capable of beaching themselves- has been lost for a long time now).

    in reply to: Sri Lanka Air Force Thread #2624040
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Maaan……I never expected our teeny weeny Air-Force to get a seperate thread at AFM…..

    Well why not my friend, Sri Lanka has always been a very interesting place interms of military procurment. They are the best example of buying the best things to get the job done!

    I have alsways found it interesting that when SL makes a purchase, they go to the trouble of learning the language of the country that is supplying the goods in order to better understand the goods. I know or a few SL pilot officers that speak five different languages which they say helps them understand the weapons systems to give them the optimal use of the said system.

    in reply to: First 3 AH-64D arrived in Israel #2624074
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Personally I think that the AH-64 is only good if you have a strong opposition in the area. In Israels case yes it is the best solution for the job, but it’s not the best for all situations, this is my point!

    in reply to: BAE Hawk MK100 users #2624100
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Yeah I heard that too, it was proposed to us down here but we want reliability not troubles, we’ve had enough of those lately!

    Hey are there any pics around on the new Mk-128 that the RAF are getting?

    in reply to: Sea Harrier Over The Falklands #2624102
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I know it’s not really the best of form, but of the original SH Mk51’s delivered to the IN how many of those are still in flying condition and how many do deploy aboard the carrier?

    in reply to: Brazil New interim Fighter #2624106
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Ok, well you almost had me going!
    Bugger

    in reply to: beagle bomber today, who still uses it? #2624113
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Pitty none are down here, Art, what would be the a) possibility of aquiriming one for a museum these dasys and B) the possible costs for said proposal?

Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 3,659 total)