dark light

thobbes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 2,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • thobbes
    Participant

    It’s really not hard regardless how some want to spin it! The F-35 is going to be wildly successful.

    Wildly successful compared to what? If comparing to Eurocannards or Pak Fa or Chinese offerings then yes.

    If compared to older successful export types (e.g. F-16), then no.

    Even if it replaces only 40% of the current fleets of F-15’s, F-16’s, AV-8’s,F/A-18’s, and A-10’s! That of course doesn’t even include other European or Russian Types. Plus…

    You keep talking about F-35 replacing “European and Russian” types yet fail to mention any countries that could be potential buyers.

    Are you really expecting headlines such as “Honduras to replace F-5 with F-35” or “Bangladesh to buy 100 F-35s” in the 2030-40 timeframe? 😀

    thobbes
    Participant

    A lot of the participants in Libya didn’t fly strike missions, only air space patrol once the pathetic Libyan air defence system was neutralised.

    And with dwindling fleet numbers in Europe, number of potential participants in NATO/Coalition style ops will decline.

    Most Euro forces would be best to buy Gripen as a cheap-to-acquire, cheap-to-operate air police jet or F/A-18E/F if they want to occassionally bomb something defencelss in a NATO op.

    F-35 iand even Rafale/Eurofighter are overkill in both roles.

    thobbes
    Participant

    can think of really need first day strike capability – usually only those who like to project their power over the border (USA, Israel, Russia, China, in some extent Turkey, UK and France…. pretty much all)

    And most of those countries are not potential F-35 users either (China, Russia and France).

    And with Turkey, is first day strike for use against Israel or Greece? For their current incursions into Iraqi airspace (and in future Syrian), F-4Es are more than sufficient!

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2311905
    thobbes
    Participant

    There’s a human element here. People don’t like to be confined in tin cans without any visual connection to the world, even if they’re not claustrophobic.

    The greater likelihood is getting rid of the pilot altogether – QF-35D anyone?

    Or will it be FQ-35D? Who knows given current US designation confusion.

    in reply to: PLAN News Thread #4 #2004799
    thobbes
    Participant

    There are factions in Japan that benefit from these kind of incidents.

    These are the growing pro-militarisation/rearmament. With Japan largely stagnant economically for decades now and China (and South Korea) ascendant, these pro-armament voices get louder and louder.

    Chinese certainly aren’t lambs but neither are the Japanese.

    Expect more idiocy on the high seas from both countries.

    in reply to: Rumoir: Greece to lease Atlantique 2s? #2311915
    thobbes
    Participant

    According to forum where I read the rumour, the speculation was that frigates involved were new Aquitaine-Class (FREMM) which would be leased to Greece as opposed to being delivered to French Navy.

    No idea how reliable this rumour is. Greece isn’t exactly in a position to introduce new equipment.

    thobbes
    Participant

    MSphere, great post

    I think Scooter doesn’t understand that the F-35 is not as F-16 or F-5 or that the Cold War requirements for users to operate large fleets of jets is largely gone.

    F-35 is a rich man’s toy. And also a rich man with the right credentials (hence F-35 not available to Saudi Arabia as it would be seen as a threat to Israel and probably not to Taiwan so as to not antagonise China).

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2311968
    thobbes
    Participant

    Always wondered about the F-35s rather obscured canopy.

    Since P-51D, the bubble/teardrop canopy has been viewed as the most optimum one for air-to-air combat and generally the world’s best fighters have had bubble canopies:

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/P-51-361.jpg/220px-P-51-361.jpg

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/North_American_F86-01.JPG/300px-North_American_F86-01.JPG

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/F-15%2C_71st_Fighter_Squadron%2C_in_flight.JPG/300px-F-15%2C_71st_Fighter_Squadron%2C_in_flight.JPG

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bf/F-16C_Fighting_Falcon.JPEG/170px-F-16C_Fighting_Falcon.JPEG

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/F-22_Raptor_Andrews_Air-force_Base.jpg/220px-F-22_Raptor_Andrews_Air-force_Base.jpg

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/90/Su-27_05.jpg/220px-Su-27_05.jpg

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/64/RSAF_Typhoon_at_Malta_-_Gordon_Zammit.jpg/300px-RSAF_Typhoon_at_Malta_-_Gordon_Zammit.jpg

    one may add, if it was as good or even better, you wouldn’t even need a canopy…. just put the pilot inside the can and close it for better stealth and aerodynamics

    Good point.

    People also forget that even in a hot warzone, ROE might require visual identification.

    Also whilst we harp on about technology and sensors, we forget that in the 1950s guns and if you believe the British government of the time, manned aircraft were obsolete.

    Yet history has proved to the contrary.

    By the way, A2A kills achieved by USA (and 1 Dutch and 2 Saudi) since 1991 could’ve been achieved by any old aircraft with relevant upgrades – after all they were guided in by AWACS, had complete dominance of electronic spectrum etc.

    This may not be the case in a proper conventional war.

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2311986
    thobbes
    Participant

    I haven’t heard of them marketing anything more than the JF17, J7 and some J10A…

    J10B, SU-27 derivatives, J20/J31 of course don’t seem to be marketed abroad at all… I think just domestic requirement is filling their production orders fine.

    I’ve heard similar stuff.

    most of their clientele are third world countries looking for simpler planes, therefore the JF17s are actually very suitable for that… still many african states now have SU27/SU30 types … so their neighbours may be wary of having just JF17 as their main fighter. Eventually china will have to offer a more advanced aircraft to match Russian offers.

    I suspect the problem is more that many sub-Saharan African states no longer possess fast jet fleets.

    Su-27/-30 have only sold to Angola, Eritrea, Uganda and Ethiopia and other than Uganda, it’s all second hand base model Su-27.

    I actually like the JF17… I think it would be a nice “second line” fighter for us 😀

    I totally agree it’s a good buy for many an airforce, especially if they’re cash strapped or aren’t expecting too much intense combat.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Egypt buys the JF-17 now that American relationship is turning sour and especially given licence production of K-8. There’s still 180 F-4/MiG-21/Mirage V that need replacing.

    Could Iraq plug into an Egyptian licence production scheme?

    And JF-17 is still better than most of the Iranian or Syrian fleets and could possibly tangle with Jordanian F-16/F-5s especially if you invest in AWACS.

    As for countering Saudi Arabia, nothing short of Su-30MK + AWACS is gonna stop them (oh and maybe getting Saudi Western contractors to go on strike).

    thobbes
    Participant

    It isn’t that the 4th generation aircraft are going on, just that there aren’t enough orders out there anymore to sustain the number of production lines operating. Manufacturers can trickle produce airframes for a while, as has been done with the Rafale, but eventually you need real orders.

    Problem is orders for fifth generation aren’t really high either.

    The cost of acquisition and maintenance modern aircraft plus increasing fuel and human resource costs are making jets unaffordable.

    There have been rumblings in countries like Czech Republic over where they stay in the business of operating supersonic interceptors.

    Argentina is apparently replacing Mirage III/5 with subsonic IA-63 light jets.

    In 2040, owning a squadron of F-86 Sabres will be sufficient to attain air superiority in many regions because there will be no opposition!

    There will likely be some sales, but by 2025 the 4th generation will be essentially done.

    Yet those 4th generation jets will be the backbone of many airforces for decades to come.

    The F-16 never came close to having a monopoly. Between the two the F-35 will be much closer to a monopoly than the F-16 ever was. It is literally the West’s only 5th generation fighter for the foreseeable future and the only fighter with an assured production run extending into the next decade.

    Totally agree. In the 1980s more high end users went for F/A-18s or even F-15s. Mirage 2000 also sold albeit quite poorly when compared to the Mirage III/5 or F1.

    Tejas is a total wreck of a program. With enough time, money, and foreign technology they may eventually make it work, but it isn’t anywhere near becoming a force in the export world.

    Makes the F-22 and F-35 programs look like F-16 level success stories!

    Honestly, for the most part Europe is giving up on maintaining its military capabilities. They will certainly maintain and upgrade much of their current fleets of aircraft, and as you already mentioned they will continue to procure some new 4th generation airframes for most of the rest of this decade, but ultimately the whole budget is getting consumed by social spending.

    Exactly – hence rumblings in Czech government about maintenance of a supersonic fleet or countries such as Croatia, Bulgaria, Romania or Serbia being completely unable to commit to even a handful of aircraft to replace ancient MiG-21s.

    Spain and Portugal are both looking to sell off chunks of their combat fleet, with the Spaniards suprisingly looking at selling expensive to fly Eurofighters instead of older F/A-18s.

    Latin America is much the same – Brazil has FX-2 but it seems extremely low priority.

    They’re still selling modified Mirage IIIs there as well – Kfir to Colombia, Cheetah to Ecuador.

    Africa is a non-market.

    That leaves Asia and Middle East.

    thobbes
    Participant

    Really, most 4th Generation Fighters are 30+ years old now. Which, include F-15’s, F-16’s, Mirage 2000’s, Flankers, Fulcrums, Hornets, AMX’s, and Tornados.

    Yep and key airforces have initiated replacement programs that are running now:

    Examples:

    F-35 – USA, Canada, UK, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Israel, Japan, Australia

    Eurofighter – UK, Spain, Italy, Austria, Oman, Saudi Arabia

    Rafale – France, India

    Gripen – Sweden, South Africa, Switzerland, Thailand, Czech Republic, Hungary

    PAK-FA – Russia, India

    South Korea – F-15K, KFX

    Brazil, UAE, Kuwait and Qatar are all working on new jet acquisition programs now.

    Also most minor airforces jets aren’t that old – -e.g. F-16s operated by Morrocco, Oman, Iraq, Chile (C/D), Poland. Or MiG-29s acquired by Sudan and Yemen.

    And many of the small operators operate jets for decades. As you well point out – look at Mirage IIIs, F-5s etc still in service.

    What does that leave for future F-35 potential operators already non-committed who can actually afford to operate fighter aircraft, let alone 5th generation jets?

    Finland
    Spain
    Switzerland
    Malaysia
    Singapore
    Belgium
    Greece (and that one’s a maybe)

    The rest of the world is a no-go because:

    1. They’re too poor
    2. They’re not friendly with the USA
    3. They have long standing restrictions on them by the USA.
    4. They’re better friends with other people like Russia

    Plus, many nations have even older aircraft like Mirage III/V, Skyhawks, Phantoms, Mirage F1’s, Mig-21’s, Mig-23/27’s, F-5’s, etc. etc. etc.

    Yet, you want us to believe we have little market today.

    If you think Argentina or Syria or Pakistan or Kazakhstan will be buying F-35s anytime soon (even in next 30 years), you’re smoking crack.

    That most nations won’t have a need replacements for another 30 years. (i.e. 2040 or later?)

    Most of them will probably be scrapping their fast jet fleets by 2040 and replacing them with light turboprops and jets.

    The ones that replace will go for second hand jets or cheaper non-Western jets.

    Examples of sales to small non-NATO airforces over last few of years:

    Ecuador brought 12 ex-SAAF Cheetahs which are rebuilt Mirage IIIs.

    Colombia brought more Kfirs.

    Sri Lanka brought second hand Kfirs and MiG-27s.

    Eritrea brought second hand MiG-29, Su-27

    Uganda brought 7 ex-Polish MiG-21s (no longer servicable) and which were replaced by 6 Su-30.

    Bangladesh – new build F-7 and small number of MiG-29s (not sure if second hand).

    Myanmar – 36 MiG-29 (not sure if second hand).

    Yemen – 24 x new MiG-29

    Sudan – 24 x new MiG-29

    Morrocco – 24 x F-16C/D

    Chile – 10 x F-16C/D, 36 x second hand F-16A/B MLU

    Oman – 12 x Eurofighter, 24 x F-16C/D

    Nigeria – 15 x F-7.

    Jordan – 60+ second hand F-16A/B

    Iraq – 36 x F-16C/D (probably won’t be a small airforce in future)

    As you can see a mixed bag indeed – lots of second hand stuff including some truly ancient airframes (upgraded Mirage IIIs i.e. Kfir, Cheetah and F-7), second hand 4th generation jets.

    Most advanced Western jet sale is 12 Eurofighters to Oman with most other operators going for F-16s.

    Where does the F-35 fit with this market? – It doesn’t – too expensive for most airforces, too complicated and one for friends only.

    thobbes
    Participant

    So, what are all those Nations that don’t operate F-35’s going to Fly??? Please, I am all ears…..;)

    Most major airforces are undergoing procurement for their next jets now and within next ten years.

    These jets will be expected to last at least 30 years.

    That makes it about 2040-50 when they will be looking for replacement. Will F-35 be still available then?

    Most smaller airforces with probably load up on second hand F-16s which will do them for 20-30 years – Jordan and Chile have already done this and Indonesia is starting to. Eastern block countries are looking into second hand F-16s as well as their next jet for the next 20-30 years.

    Others will be operating Flankers or Eurocannards or even Chinese jets.

    Do you believe that in 2040 all the airforces of the world will be flying 5th generation stealth jets?

    Look at some of the old jets flying nowadays (and with powerful airforces):

    South Korea – operated 1960s vintage F-4Ds until recently. Still has 1970s vintage F-4s and F-5s in service

    Singapore – 1970/80s vintage F-5s in service

    Greece – 1970s vintage F-4 and A-7 still in service

    Turkey – 1970s vintage F-4 still in service

    Vietnam – 1970s vintage MiG-21bis still mainstay of airforce.

    Egypt – in addition to 220-odd F-16s and 18 Mirage 2000s there’s about 180 1960 and 1970s vintage F-4/Mirage 5/MiG-21 in service.

    So if in 2013 we have lots of 40 year old jets still in service, it stands to reasons there’ll be plenty of 40 year old jets in service in 2040. In fact given aircraft are having longer service lives, 40-60 years will probably be quite common.

    thobbes
    Participant

    AGAIN you are basing your assumption on what you think is likely today? We are discussing what will likely happen over the next 30 years!

    Look at fighter sale trends since 1950.

    Look at complete decline in sales since 1990.

    And I am looking at what will happen in next 30 years by looking at what’s happened in the last 70 (since 1950).

    Let me put it another way. We know thousands of fighters are going to retire I the next couple of decades.

    But how many of those thousands are potential F-35 customers?

    Is Belarus a potential customer? No as Belarus is affiliated with Russia and even if they switched to NATO after Lukashenko, they will still probably be concerns regarding safety of sensitive data in a force closely affiliated with Russia.

    Is Nigeria a potential customer as an F-7 replacement? Again not really.

    Or North Korea?

    Even looking at areas closer to home, a lot of users won’t ever be in the need for an F-35 or who have already committed to a new jet fighter for the next 30-40 years.

    E.g. South Africa has brought 26 JAS-39C/D Gripens to replace Cheetah. That covers them for the next 30 years (in fact probably longer as Gripiens are only entering service).

    The only way the South Africans would buy F-35 is to increase their fighter fleet, which defies a downward trend started in 1991. Why would you need a 5th generation stealth fighter in Africa where average country has no IADS. :confused:

    Or all the ex-European states whose average fighter fleets have been shrinking to a grand total average of 12 jets.

    However if they commit to second hand F-16 (most likely option) then that’s their fighter for the next 20 years.

    So, while many won’t be replaced most will. So, now take that market and what’s going to replace the majority of them.

    You neglect the fact that a lot of customers are locked into their next jet. E.g. South Africa = Gripen, France = Rafale, India = Rafale/Pak Fa/Su-30MKI/Tejas/MiG-29K, Czech Republic = Gripen, Germany = Eurofighter. And so on.

    [quote]
    The F-22 expensive and out of production.[/quote

    Then why mention it.

    or Europe well no they didn’t build a 5th Generation Fighter……………..The list goes on and on, Sorry, the F-35 is going to have the biggest share of the Fighter Market for the next 20-30 years hands down.

    You somehow think everyojne needs a 5th generation fighter or has the money and requirement to operate one.

    Switzerland chose JAS-39E/F, India chose Rafale, Oman chose Eurofighter, Saudi Arabia chose Eurofighter. They all could’ve waited and jumpe on the F-35 bandwagon but they didn’t.

    In 2030-40 the average small country will still be flying F-16s or MiG-29s and the lucky ones will have Eurofighter/Gripen/Rafale. I wouldn’t be surprised if we still have F-5E/Fs in service – Kenya just brought some more and other operators are continuing to upgrade them.

    In fact the F-16 user group will increase in the next few years with Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia all potentially joining the group with second hand aircraft.

    Only the rich few will operate 5th Generation and then only in small numbers (other than USA).

    thobbes
    Participant

    Here’s my predictions for non-US new build F-35 sales:

    Australia: 75

    Belgium: 48

    Canada: 60-80 (even after competition)

    Denmark: 22-30

    Finland: 50-60 to replace F/A-18.

    Greece: <100 (provided they don’t become a third world country in the process. 😀 )

    Israel: 100+ (partially dependent on how many Uncle Sam funds). I suspect they’ll receive lots of second hand ones.

    Italy: <90 planned

    Netherlands: 60

    Norway: 52

    Poland: 48-60 to replace MiG-29/F-16.

    Singapore: 80-100 (replace F-5 and F-16)

    South Korea: depends on success of KFX.

    Spain: 60-80 to replace F/A-18 and AV-8 depending on economy and political integrity

    Turkey: 200+ (first batch of 116 with follow on orders)

    UK: 48 F-35B + 100+ F-35A to replace Eurofighter (depending on Scottish independence).

    Japan is difficult to determine given their somewhat wierd procurement processes. It could be as few as 4 (first order) to as large as 300 to replace F-4/F-2/F-15 depending on success of local planes and economy.

    US is also difficult to predict due to larger buys.

    Unfortunately I do not see many more new build sales than those listed above due:
    1. Political issues (especially Middle East, Asia).
    2. Economics (every one)
    3. Priorities (especially Latin America, Eastern Europe)
    4. Complexity of F-35 and sensitivity of some of technology associated with it.
    5. Overall affordability of F-35.

    thobbes
    Participant

    Sure the F-35 isn’t going to replace every F-16 that has been in service during the life of the program. Yet, it will replace a good number of them. Along with a good number of Warthogs, Eagles, Harriers, Hornets, Super Hornets, Mirages, Migs, etc. etc.

    Whose Mirages?

    French? – replaced by Rafale

    UAE? – replaced by Rafale/Eurofighter

    Taiwan? – Chances of this happening are extremely limited

    Greek? – last news I heard was fleet is to start drawdown as part of budget cuts.

    Spanish? – Eurofighter – retired 2013.

    Pakistan? – Replace by JF-17. Pakistan probably won’t be eligible for F-35.

    Morocco? – Again, will they be eligible for F-35?

    Brazil? – F-35 not on offer for F-X2. Still a possibility though unlikely especially due to local industrial participation not.

    Ghana – No

    Egypt – probably not due to Israel basing conventional air deterrence on F-35. US has rejected requests for F-15Es from Egypt in the past.

    Qatar – probably not. I think they’re looking at Rafale/Eurofighter

    India – maybe?

    Peru – again probably not due to balance of power and politics.

    Argentina – Mirages are apparently being retired this year. Argentina has been unable to acquire modern supersonic aircraft for a long time. US is often reluctant to sell advanced kit to Latin America in order to maintain balance of power.

    E.g. Chilean F-16s were allowed because Peru brought MiG-29s.

    Whose MiGs?
    Polish? probably not – Poland can’t even afford to replace it’s Sukhois with something better than a UAV and even that’s not certain. I suspect MiG-29s will also be retired without replacement and F-16s.

    Romanian? Definitely not. Country needs a lot of time for economic catch up from Communist era mismanagement and even pre-WWII poverty.

    Bulgaria? Same as Romania.

    Slovakia? Same as above

    Croatia? Extremly small country with dwindling population base. Most likey not.

    Egypt? – see Mirage

    India – maybe for MiG-27/-29 replacement.

    Serbia? – Serbs are moving back East.

    Syria – no

    Libya – no

    Angola – no

    Eritrea – no

    Ethiopia – no.

    Vietnam – no.

    Algeria – no

    Myanmar – no

    Sudan – no

    Yemen – no

    Malaysia – probably not. Malaysia is looking to replace MiG-29 soon and probably before F-35 is available.

    The reasons for no answers are long standing economic and political ones that date back decades and have nothing to do with GFC.

    E.g. Romania was poor pre-WWII and things didn’t get better in Cold War period.

    There’s a lot of catch up to develop a modern economy that can afford something like an F-35.

    Other countries have had long term instability and the US generally won’t sell or authorise sale to them anything except 3rd rate junk – e.g. sale of F-5E to Yemen.

    A lot of countries mentioned don’t have solid relations with US. Even if they develop them in the next 30 years, it will take time for US to allow sale of advanced kit ala F-35.

    And even US allies don’t have access to advanced kit due to political issues- e.g. Egypt or even Saudi Arabia (F-35 only for Israel).

    E.g. look at Iraq and sale of downgraded F-16IQ.

    —–

    As stated Super Hornet is to be replaced in USN service by FAXX 6th generation jet.

    Australian situation is becoming murky.

    I’d be interested to hear your opinion on these as opposed to a vague “people will buy lots of F-35s.”

    By the way I think F-35 export sales will dwarf combined Eurofighter/Gripen/Rafale sales. However it’s adoption by global airforces will be far less than F-84, F-86, F-104, F-5 and F-16.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 2,012 total)