dark light

PeterVerney

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 844 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bristol Brigand. #1157093
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    Apparently there were issues with the undercarriage collapsing, air brakes failing in tropical conditions and main spar failures too, according to google. Shame, it looks such a purposeful aircraft too.

    The rumour was that the main spars were made by Frys Chocolate in Bristol 😀

    The air brakes were something else. From memory, there were a pair outboard of the flaps, plus another above the flaps, which were also linked to the air brakes. Operation was dead simple, by big canvas bags 😮 There were big openings in the leading edges covered by doors which were controlled by the air brake lever. On operation the bags rapidly filled with ram air and the whole contraption lost about 50 knots in zero time, just like hitting a brick wall.

    Some of the OCU pilots loved demonstrating them but we had to be forewarned or we would rapidly join the pilot up front.

    in reply to: Avro Vulcan XL319 Restoration Project #1154372
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    Stupid thought.
    Why not prop it up permanently in that position, looks much better than just standing there.

    in reply to: Bristol Brigand. #1154379
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    I have RH801, 805, 806,and WA563. 564, 566 and 568 in my logbook. All at 228 OCU Leeming. It was a real steep learning curve, prior to going there radar was an absolutely black art to me, and still is.

    in reply to: Weight Of Snow On Aircraft Outdoors #1154074
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    I still don’t think you could get it airbourne in a hurry.
    PS kg per cu metre has this old fool totally bewildered.

    in reply to: Yikes! #1154078
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Good Vibs;1514354]I was speaking to a glider pilot the other day and he mentioned “how peaceful & quite it is without the engine noise, etc”.
    I immediately thought…my god.. terror, scream, sweat, get into action quick…no engine power. Time for the emergency procedures!

    I well remember causing double engine failure on a Mosquito by mishandling the fuel system:o:o. There was no terror etc., but I did learn some extra special Polish from my pilot:eek:

    in reply to: Bristol Brigand. #1154086
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    For Merkle and anybody who is interested.
    After a short Valetta course at Dishforth ,my father soloed Bristol Brigand RH769 on 8/8/56. Serials flown : RH766,767,769,771,775,801,805,806,808,858
    WA560,562,563.569.
    3 Brigands and 4 Balliols were detached to N. Germany Wahn and Alhorn 01/11/56 for 3 weeks using Brigands 801,806,858 and Balliols 159,522,525 and 990. My father last flew a Brigand 563 on 04/3/57,he was loaned to the unit as he was now with 228 OCU at Leeming on Valettas.

    He flew a total of 376 hrs on the Balliol and 74 hrs on Brigands.

    Hi T21
    I was at Leeming from August 1951 to Jan 1952, and did some 44 hours on the Brigand, then we went on to the Mosquito NF36. The Meteor NF11 was introduced later in 1952. I did 5 hours in the NF11 while our unit was awaiting the NF13. I also served on the NF12 and 14. I also had one trip in a Brigand T5, WA566 in July 1956 being trained on AI Mk21, I had only been using it since Oct 54 😡

    With regard to the rear cockpit layout on the radar trainers T4 and T5. There was a shelf along the starboard side on which the boxes were arranged and ISTR a bench on the port side for the pupil and instructor. I attach a poor copy taken from a PRO file
    http://i345.photobucket.com/albums/p398/navrad/152sqdn008.jpg

    in reply to: Weight Of Snow On Aircraft Outdoors #1152525
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    methinks you miss the point – some of us still think in pounds and ounces and feet, inches and yards!!!!

    Roger Smith:)

    AND those are much more practical measures to get ones head around. Still can see an inch and a half, and step out a distance in yards.

    in reply to: Lysander Grip #1148132
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    There were all sorts of lash ups made to counter Operation Sealion. How about Tiger Moths with bomb racks. Anything to frighten the horses which the Germans proposed to carry across the channel on their river barges. It is a great pity they never attempted this mad scheme.

    in reply to: RAF Wartime Aircrew Training Aircraft #1147391
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    Regarding an enquiry into accidents. In the early 50s there was a very high accident rate among trainees, especially jet pilots and the Meteor gained a very bad reputation, “phantom diver” etc. Winston Churchill was quoted somewhere of raising this in the house of commons. He got an answer along the lines of “A pilot has a 16 to 1 chance of being killed during his first 18 months on jets. This is considered acceptable”
    Churchills answer was along the lines “That may be acceptable to the civil service, but it is not acceptable to me”. There was then a considerable drive to include safety training and awareness apparent in the early 50s. See Colin Cummings book “Last Take Off” which details almost 1200 deaths in RAF accidents in the 4 years 1950 to 1953.

    in reply to: RAF Wartime Aircrew Training Aircraft #1147397
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    Don’t forget they had beancounters in those days. Standards of maintenance I would say were very good. BUT the aircraft were very often tired second rate machines, some with poor flying characteristics, just waiting to turn round and bite the inexperienced, and often overconfident, eager young men flying them.
    The same “Press on regardless” attitude pervaded the whole of the RAF, so flights would not be scrubbed for trivial reasons.

    in reply to: 1940 Combat Reports #1146851
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    I am lost in admiration of your dedication.
    As a devout coward I have often wondered how I would have coped in an actual combat situation.

    in reply to: RAF Wartime Aircrew Training Aircraft #1146856
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    Kev35, that is a very interesting set of statistics and points the finger at the most complicated part, the engine. At a guess the Blenheim and the Whitley could not be flown successfully on one, does anyone know? The Wellington also I would suggest was marginal. I recall that loosing an engine in a Brigand resulted in an extremely relieved crew when we landed shortly afterwards.
    As another aside, that brings to mind an incident in a Meteor with a very experienced pilot. He demonstrated to me a single engined overshoot, allowed the speed to decay perhaps 3 knots too low. We lost directional control and also had not the power to gain a lot of height. I clearly remember having a very close up and personal view of a hangar roof. Not an experience to be recommended.

    And Bravo 333, in the early 50s I would hazard that there were more NCO than officer aircrew.

    in reply to: RAF Wartime Aircrew Training Aircraft #1145763
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    Regarding ground crew. I feel that it is very unfair to criticise them, they could be put under great pressure, but a very professional attitude was maintained by their officers and NCOs.
    I remember at Leeming we had several instances of Mosquitos having engine cuts on take off. The grouncrew had their passes cancelled during two weekends, in order that the spark plugs could all be changed ready for Monday morning. Some 20 aircraft with 24 plugs per Merlin, and those in the VEE almost guaranteed barked knuckles.

    in reply to: RAF Wartime Aircrew Training Aircraft #1145767
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    AlertKen, you make a very good point. When people talk to me about the numerous accidents with fancy aeroplanes, I say, ” Give an 19 year old a sports car and what is the first thing he does. He finds out how fast it goes and how well it corners. The same applied to pilots, but some of the aircraft he was called upon to fly required to be ‘flown’. Mishandling, or exceeding the limits laid down in Pilots Notes, could be very sharply punished.
    As for cockpit layouts, the Mosquito had its quirks. My pilot was short and retracting the undercarriage required the pilot to take his left hand off the throttles/pitch controls and transfer to the stick. This was in order that he could reach across and down to operate the undercarriage lever with the right hand. My pilot would have to duck his head below the coaming so could not see out during this hasty job. It was essential to retract the u/c ASAP because the a/c could not be accelerated to safety speed with the gear down. In addition the flap lever sat beside the u/cart lever.
    If an engine failed switches and throttles had to be done, and fuel shut off using the cocks BEHIND the pilot. And then the vital feather button had to be operated, shielded by a flap and right over on the navs side of the cockpit, above the radar. How many pilots hit the wrong one at a critical moment, I can recall two in my short experience of the type. Not when I was in them I hasten to add, I am a devout coward and always kept well away if anything dangerous was likely.

    in reply to: RAF Wartime Aircrew Training Aircraft #1145383
    PeterVerney
    Participant

    Creaking Door. The Brigand needed every one of those 5000? horses to drag it off the deck. It had the aerodynamics of a house brick and was built like the original brick s**thouse. Nevertheless it felt safe to fly in, generally. However in 22 flights in them I experienced two engine failures, the first says “oil leak” in my logbook, but I don’t remember the other.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 844 total)