dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Messing with spotters #1048726
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’ve fiddled about with about 20 or more P51’s. I’d be hard pressed to tell you the N # of more than 2 of them…

    …but thankfully the people that pay large amounts of money by attending air shows/air events, buying magazines, and everything else associated with the hobby of spotting contributes money to keep these companies going and people like you employed could probably tell you the Mustang numbers!
    I find it slightly sad that you can’t remember 20 Mustangs, I think I can remember just about every aircraft (and usually the occasion) I’ve seen, both through my work and in my ‘spotting’ days.

    Have to agree with Baz, in fact my interest was fuelled by a handful of people like him.:)

    Don’t forget, that as in any hobby, it is the dedicated enthusiast at the grass roots that keeps the whole thing alive, for the general followers and public to enjoy. Would IAT/RIATs be run over four plus days without spotters? In fact would it attract the public at all if the hobby didn’t exist?

    Probably my only issue is with those that just collect numbers/radio call signs without wishing to know anything about the aircraft or aviation, and in some cases without seeing the aircraft itself. However that could be a lack of understanding on my part.

    in reply to: HFL Hunters and Gannet at St Athan #1048737
    pagen01
    Participant

    Yes.
    I have put a couple od subtle hints on here, but they were all missed!:rolleyes:

    Three of the Hunters, Miss Demeanor, XL573 (my Favourite), and G-PRII arrived last week.
    I was looking for my hunters at St Athan thread from August but is seems to have disapeared, even from Google serach:confused:

    in reply to: Restoration veil of secrecy #1049250
    pagen01
    Participant

    The thing i don’t like is the type of posts we get here sometimes….you know the ones….’I know something you don’t’…..’but I wont tell you’…..wish they would just keep it to themselves.

    Have to agree with that, and then it generates alsorts of internet and forum hype.

    in reply to: VP293 stripped out – pictures #1049520
    pagen01
    Participant

    That sounds really good of Scotty, a Shack yoke must be a difficult item to let go of.
    Nice to know that work on VP293 is progressing well.:)

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1049709
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks for the info Webpilot, time to label up my slides now!:)

    Must have been great days there HunterXF, I know Flt Sgt controller who when he has a younger audience boasts that when he started in the RAF it was working Meteors, he’s reffering to the Brawdy pair of course!

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1049729
    pagen01
    Participant

    Unsure, which is why I didn’t commit in my post, there are some minor differences, but can’t be too many F.2 ‘pits kicking around and with those markings?
    Thanks for posting my pic btw:)

    Edit, actually, yes it is ZD932, the patches etc are all in the right places.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1049880
    pagen01
    Participant

    A case of find another I think,
    If it’s the same one (refuelling probe & cover missing though) it didn’t take long to hit the market, end of this thread http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=100598&page=2&highlight=Tornado

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1050180
    pagen01
    Participant

    Fantastic, better make this the last question as I don’t want this thread to go off on a tangent, but are the second set of numbers the airframe sequence, or sqn codes?

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1050185
    pagen01
    Participant

    In all the time I’ve been spotting I never realised that there was an orderly number system, always wondered what the WGAF numbers meant!

    in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1050193
    pagen01
    Participant

    Chistmas treat to fit the canopy and screen frame eh – has to be done, sometimes to keep the enthusiasm going, though it looks like you have bundles of that.
    The seat looks really nice aswel.

    This must be the most careful and detailed restoration of single seat Vampire pod in a long time?

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1050217
    pagen01
    Participant

    The bait being I will buy you a beer as I own the Cherry Tree In Catthorpe, which is in the GBG for the last 5 years.

    Bravo, if anyone who lives in your area doesn’t take that excellent offer up they must be mad!
    Which aircraft is 37+86? Google wouldn’t reveal it for me.

    HunterXF, the Hunter in your last link is the one that someone has made a flying model of that I mentioned earlier, nice to see a pic of the real thing!:)

    Re Brawdy Hunters, wasn’t the forums’ BazV there aswel?

    in reply to: Bad News for Jaguar lovers…. #1050994
    pagen01
    Participant

    That would make some sense, with Lossie due to be the only northern QRA and JSF base, and Kinloss shut & Leauchars to close diversions wil have to be to civil airports.
    You would think the RAF would foot the bill for the result of closing airfields and the need for civil training in dealing with their emergencies though.
    Not sure that Cardiff does this specific training and it handles diversions in Wales and west region.

    in reply to: Falklands we told you so ??? a vintage deterrent #1051026
    pagen01
    Participant

    How do you do it T/O!:D

    in reply to: Falklands we told you so ??? a vintage deterrent #1051057
    pagen01
    Participant

    This sounds like press hype to me.
    Surely the Falklands is easier to monitor and defend than ever, there is a major RAF base on the islands, Typhoon fighters and ground attack aircraft are relatively straight forward to deploy over long distances with VC-10 & Tristar AAR (Airbus tanker soon), complete with long-range and highly capable AEW (Sentry AEW.1), fast large transports (C-17, Hercules C.4/5 – A400M soon), surveilance types such as Sentinal R.1 and the various UAVs, and a very capable helicopter and assault ship in the shape of HMS Ocean, which can deploy Apache gunships, all things that we didn’t posess before.
    HMS Albion & Bulwark are held in readiness, deployable helicopters are Sea King (inc HC.4 & AEW), Lynx (Army & RN), Chinook, Merlin (RAF & RN), Puma, and Apache.
    And that is before you get on to the various unmanned weaponary.

    in reply to: Bad News for Jaguar lovers…. #1051229
    pagen01
    Participant

    Seems an odd choice for civil fire fighter training, I would have thought that an airliner or small civil type hulk would have given a more encounterable and wider training experience for civil crews.
    I would be surprised if it is set light to, after one or two burns it would be useless, and the MoD seems to have stopped the practice, not sure what the civil regs are with it.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 9,672 total)