dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bader letter – very very rare #1010511
    pagen01
    Participant

    his telphone number was 937 0902

    which would make 1955 more sence

    Apart from the October 1984 that he alludes to in the text of the letter?

    in reply to: Flying Logbooks Should NEVER Be Destroyed. #1010584
    pagen01
    Participant

    I wonder if sometimes, when someone is killed in flying, that the rest of the family don’t want any reminder or evidence left of the flying activities?

    Also worth noting that ‘lost forever’ could be accidental through moving or flood etc, or even squirelled away in an unkown collection, though I don’t know in Davids’ cases above.

    David, have you ever come across Gordon Slades’ logbooks?

    in reply to: Supermarine Swift EX Sheppards Surplus #1011611
    pagen01
    Participant

    Fantastic, and after Chris and the gangs work on the Harrier T.2 restoration this will be great when completed. With Nigel Walpole on board it should be even better, and it’s great to see Jetart have put up a webpage on the project.

    Considering it was at a scrappies for so long, I’m amazed how complete the cockpit and everything else appears to be.
    For me this has to be the most eagerly awaited static restoration.

    PS, completely concur with Chris about the ‘Sound Barrier’, finest aviation film ever IMHO!

    in reply to: National Cold War Exhibition, RAFM Cosford #1011945
    pagen01
    Participant

    Hercs didn’t always park their props in a ‘+’ therefore it’s hard to argue that the RAFM is wrong, even if it wasn’t standard practice.
    Looking through pictures on the net it seems that ‘202 has been displayed with props in both positions.

    in reply to: Barry Leeming's Royal Navy FAA images #1011989
    pagen01
    Participant

    Great to see the practice bail-out shots, something you don’t normally think of.

    in reply to: Barry Leeming's Royal Navy FAA images #1012268
    pagen01
    Participant

    Nice formation of jet, hooked Spitefuls!
    Were you away?!:D Thanks to you both for continuously posting these images.

    in reply to: Baffin project underway Dairy Flat NZ #1012298
    pagen01
    Participant

    Fascinating, thanks for the reply.
    It’s great to see such unusual types from that time frame to be so well looked into.

    in reply to: Baffin project underway Dairy Flat NZ #1012318
    pagen01
    Participant

    I have to ask Dave, how do you know the smallest details about the recovery like that, from eyewitnesses or documented etc?

    in reply to: RAF History Custodian Requests Photo Assistance #1012614
    pagen01
    Participant

    Pembroke, at almost 20 years must be one of the longest serving types with 60?

    in reply to: Welcome Back Tangmere1940, Charlie Hunt And Mark12 (merged) #1014370
    pagen01
    Participant

    Great resolution and outcome, glad common sense prevailed.
    Welcome back chaps, and thanks to Paul mcmillan for highlighting the situation for us.

    in reply to: Hunter F6 XG185 DFCS mid 1960's – HELP #1014832
    pagen01
    Participant

    Hi Steve, if you do manage to resize the image it would be great to see it here.

    in reply to: Current status of the "Kee Bird" B-29 Superfortress #1014841
    pagen01
    Participant

    This one at the bottom of the water, Zeeland, http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=121025

    What became of the story of chunks of ‘Kee Bird’ moving to Holland?

    in reply to: Baffin project underway Dairy Flat NZ #1014846
    pagen01
    Participant

    Wow, now there’s a type that I would love to see complete, best of luck with the restoration!

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #1015578
    pagen01
    Participant

    One Webbie?!

    The fact that there is one webmaster that has come back from holiday to find this situation worries me!
    Surely a forum of this magnitude (possibly largest aviation forum?) needs enough webbies looking out for it to cover holidays, sickness and weekends.

    Also begs the question, if he was away and came back to this, who issued the ban?

    This has has all been woefully dealt with at the top, and I can entirely see Andy’s point.
    He was quite chipper on Saturday morning when I spoke to him, but sounds deafeted now.
    I also understand that all that was revealed in the offending thread was information that is already in public domain.

    I just hope that Peter and Andy will get their explanation, apology, and welcome back.

    in reply to: Dear Santa … What I *Really* Want Is #1015859
    pagen01
    Participant

    Down to earth one for me, either remember to whom I lent it, or for the person to come forward with, my video of St Mawgan with the two Nimrod incidents, Buccaneer belly landing, and various IAD air shows on it, all nicely prodced by the RAF video unit on the station.

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 9,672 total)